Technologies of status management status dynamics in e-mail communications

This chapter considers the social structuring processes that occur in groups using computer medicated communications (CMC). Building on a model of status dynamics in face-to-face groups, we develop a series of propositions that indicate how characteristic differences between face-to-face and computer-mediated communications media are likely to affect the behaviors used by individuals to manage their status in a group setting. We propose several types of behaviors or moves that appear to be used to create, negotiate, and manage status in electronically communicating groups. We use qualitative field data from on-going teams to illustrate this perspective of how communication technology can shape the informal social structures of groups.

[1]  M. Feldman,et al.  Electronic Mail and Organizational Communication: Does Saying Hi Really Matter? , 1998 .

[2]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[3]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[4]  R. Bales,et al.  Channels of communication in small groups. , 1951 .

[5]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[6]  Janet Fulk.  Social construction of communication technology , 1993 .

[7]  Harold H. Kelley,et al.  Communication in Experimentally Created Hierarchies , 1951 .

[8]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[9]  R. Daft,et al.  A Tentative Exploration into the Amount and Equivocality of Information Processing in Organizational Work Units. , 1981 .

[10]  J. Sherblom.  Direction, Function, and Signature in Electronic Mail , 1988 .

[11]  Gary Gumpert,et al.  Inter/Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World , 1983 .

[12]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[13]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[14]  R. Johansen,et al.  Electronic meetings : technical alternatives and social choices , 1979 .

[15]  William Douglas Rifkin.  Communication between technical and nontechnical people : the negotiation of expert status , 1990 .

[16]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[17]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  L. Adrianson,et al.  Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication , 1991 .

[19]  S. R. Hiltz.  The Network Nation , 1978 .

[20]  G. Lenski,et al.  Power and Privilege , 1966 .

[21]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[22]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[23]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[24]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status, rewards, and influence , 1985 .

[25]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[26]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[27]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[28]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[29]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[30]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[31]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[32]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Structuring of Genres in Electronic Communication: Reinforcement and Change of Social Interaction , 1999 .

[33]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[34]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[35]  N. Contractor,et al.  Communication networks and new media in organizations , 1990 .

[36]  K. Matheson.  Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference , 1991 .

[37]  John F. Padgett,et al.  Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434 , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  M. Knapp,et al.  Nonverbal communication in human interaction , 1972 .

[39]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[40]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[41]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Computer Communication and Organizational Commitment: Tracing the Relationship in a City Government , 1989 .

[42]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[43]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Gender and Democracy in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1995, Computerization and Controversy, 2nd Ed..

[44]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[45]  R. Rice,et al.  Electronic Emotion , 1987 .

[46]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups? , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  G. Hiemstra.  Teleconferencing, Concern for Face, and Organizational Culture , 1982 .

[48]  J OrlikowskiWanda,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication , 1995 .

[49]  S LeeAllen.  Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication , 1994 .

[50]  David A. Owens,et al.  Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. , 2001 .

[51]  Giuseppe Mantovani,et al.  Is Computer-Mediated Communication Intrinsically Apt to Enhance Democracy in Organizations? , 1994 .