Form-Focused Interaction in Online Tandem Learning.

Tandem language learning a configuration involving pairs of learners with complementary target/native languages is an underexploited but potentially very powerful use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in second-language pedagogy. Tandem offers the benefits of authentic, culturally grounded interaction, while also promoting a pedagogical focus among participants. CMC-based tandem promises, in addition, those benefits believed to accrue from text-based interaction, in particular, promotion of conscious attention to language forms in the course of meaningful communication. This paper presents data from a study based on the spontaneous interactions of tandem partners during a weekly, term-long synchronous exchange based in a MOO (Object-Oriented Multi-User Domain). It begins with an introduction to the concept of tandem language learning. The theoretical background, sketched briefly, is a model of instructed second-language acquisition that emphasizes the role of metalinguistic awareness. The empirical section examines negotiation of meaning, a discourse phenomenon held to bring about metalinguistic focus, and, more specifically, signal form and focus. The study analyzes learner interactions along the parameters of home country (Ireland or Germany), current tandem role (NS or NNS), and utterance language. It is suggested that the behaviors observed in this project have their roots in both the tandem learning setup and the text-based medium.

[1]  María José de la Fuente.  NEGOTIATION AND ORAL ACQUISITION OF L2 VOCABULARY , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience , 1995 .

[3]  David Little,et al.  A Guide to Language Learning in Tandem via the Internet. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 46. , 1996 .

[4]  Breffni O'Rourke,et al.  Metalinguistic knowledge in instructed second language acquisition: A theoretical model and its application in computer-mediated communicationi , 2003 .

[5]  Marie-Noëlle Lamy,et al.  ’Reflective conversation’ in the virtual language classroom , 2005 .

[6]  Bryan Smith.  Computer–Mediated Negotiated Interaction: An Expanded Model , 2003 .

[7]  S. Thornbury.  Reformulation and reconstruction: tasks that promote ‘noticing’ , 1997 .

[8]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Online Learning in Sociocultural Context , 1998 .

[9]  Jill Pellettieri,et al.  Network-based Language Teaching: Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence , 2000 .

[10]  Robin Goodfellow,et al.  "REFLECTIVE CONVERSATION" IN THE VIRTUAL LANGUAGE CLASSROOM 1 , 1999 .

[11]  A. Fortune,et al.  Knotted and Entangled: New Light on the Identification, Classification and Value of Language Related Episodes in Collaborative Output Tasks , 2001 .

[12]  J. Hulstijn,et al.  Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal , 1994 .

[13]  Catherine Doughty,et al.  Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. , 1998 .

[14]  Gary A. Cziko.  Electronic Tandem Language Learning (eTandem): A Third Approach to Second Language Learning for the 21st Century , 2013 .

[15]  Marisol Fernández-García,et al.  Negotiation of Meaning in Nonnative Speaker-Nonnative Speaker Synchronous Discussions , 2013 .

[16]  Marta Benítez Fernández-Espartero.  The use of blogs as international feedback in the efl clasroom: a way to focus on form through conscious reflection , 2011 .

[17]  M. Swain,et al.  A Vygotskian Perspective on Corrective Feedback in L2: The Effect of Random Versus Negotiated Help on the Learning of English Articles , 2000 .

[18]  Markus Kötter.  Tandem Learning on the Internet: Learner Interactions in Virtual Online Environments (Moos) , 2002 .

[19]  A. Feenberg.  A user’s guide to the pragmatics of computer mediated communication , 1989 .

[20]  H. Widdowson,et al.  Teaching Language as Communication , 1979 .

[21]  Dorothy M. Chun.  Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence , 1994 .

[22]  Michael P. Breen,et al.  The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching , 1980 .

[23]  Guy Aston,et al.  TROUBLE-SHOOTING IN INTERACTION WITH LEARNERS: THE MORE THE MERRIER? , 1986 .

[24]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[25]  J. Lantolf.  Second language learning as a mediated process , 2000, Language Teaching.

[26]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .

[27]  Michael H. Long.  Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology , 1991 .

[28]  E. Ushioda,et al.  Evaluating tandem language learning via e-mail: Report on a bilaterlal project , 1999 .

[29]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research , 1994 .

[30]  Frank B. Brooks,et al.  Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks , 1994 .

[31]  Evangeline Marlos Varonis,et al.  Non-native/Non-native Conversations: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning , 1985 .

[32]  Mark Darhower.  Interactional Features of Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in the Intermediate L2 Class: A Sociocultural Case Study , 2013 .

[33]  Julie A. Belz,et al.  Social Dimensions of Telecollaborative Foreign Language Study , 2002 .

[34]  John Roberts,et al.  The Communicative Approach to Language teaching , 2004 .

[35]  Klaus Schwienhorst,et al.  Evaluating Tandem Language Learning by E-Mail: Report on a Bilateral Project. CLCS Occasional Paper No. 55. , 1999 .

[36]  Lina Lee,et al.  Learners' Perspectives on Networked Collaborative Interaction with Native Speakers of Spanish in the US , 2004 .

[37]  Kathleen Ferrara,et al.  Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register , 1991 .

[38]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[39]  Alexander E. Voiskounsky.  Telelogue Conversations , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Lina Lee,et al.  Synchronous online exchanges: a study of modification devices on non-native discourse , 2002 .

[41]  Klaus Schwienhorst,et al.  Monitoring Bilingualism: Pedagogical Implications of the Bilingual Tandem Analyser , 2013 .

[42]  W. Rutherford,et al.  Consciousness-raising and Universal Grammar , 1985 .

[43]  R. Ellis.  Task-based research and language pedagogy , 2000 .

[44]  J. Belz.  The myth of the deficient communicator , 2002 .

[45]  R. Leow.  Attention, Awareness, and Foreign Language Behavior , 1997 .

[46]  L. Schauble,et al.  Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. , 1994 .

[47]  M. Warschauer.  Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[48]  Claus Gnutzmann,et al.  Language awareness: Progress in language learning and language education, or reformulation of old ideas? , 1997 .

[49]  S. Thorne.  Artifacts and Cultures-of-use in Intercultural Communication , 2003 .

[50]  Michael H. Long.  Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input1 , 1983 .

[51]  A. Firth,et al.  On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA Research , 1997 .

[52]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[53]  J. Stevenson.  The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[54]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[55]  Karl J. Krahnke.  The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom , 1985 .

[56]  C. Werry.  Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat , 1996 .

[57]  Claire J. Kramsch,et al.  Context and Culture in Language Teaching , 1993 .

[58]  Marisol Fernández-García,et al.  Learners’ interactions: a comparison of oral and computer-assisted written conversations , 2003, ReCALL.

[59]  M. Swain,et al.  THEORETICAL BASES OF COMMUNICATIVE APPROACHES TO SECOND LANGUAGE TEACHING AND TESTING , 1980 .