Pricing games of mixed conventional and e-commerce distribution channels

In this paper, a distribution system is studied, in which a supplier sells a common product through conventional (physical retailer) and e-commerce (e-tailers) channels. We examine two types of Stackelberg pricing games and one type of Nash pricing game in this dual-channel distribution system. We also analyze the effects of several key factors (i.e., the supplier's pricing mode, game schemes, and efficiency of e-channel in relation to acceptance of channels) on the resulting prices as well as the profits for the supplier and the retailer, respectively. This paper is an effort to examine modeling competition in the multiple-channel environment from a pricing viewpoint. We find that channel acceptance plays a critical role in influencing equilibrium prices and profits in the dual-channel distribution system. When the customer acceptance of one channel exceeds a certain threshold, this channel cannibalizes all retail sales and dominates the distribution system. The supplier can make more profits by adopting a differential pricing strategy; on the contrary, the retailer prefers uniform pricing. Numerical analysis indicates that both the supplier and the retailer are worse off in the Nash game than in the Stackelberg games. The supplier prefers an e-channel with higher efficiency, whereas the physical retailer has to maintain higher channel acceptance to maintain its position in the distribution system.

[1]  D. Sappington,et al.  The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment , 2007 .

[2]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer , 1991 .

[3]  Xiaohang Yue,et al.  Strategic inventory deployment for retail and e-tail stores , 2009 .

[4]  Zhi Pei,et al.  Retail services and firm profit in a dual-channel market , 2009 .

[5]  Eunkyu Lee,et al.  Internet Channel Entry: A Strategic Analysis of Mixed Channel Structures , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[6]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  Why Competition from a Multi-Channel E-Tailer Does Not Always Benefit Consumers , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[7]  Christine Ebling,et al.  Multi-channel price differentiation: An empirical investigation of existence and causes , 2010 .

[8]  Mark Goh,et al.  A new two-party bargaining mechanism , 2013, J. Comb. Optim..

[9]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Price and lead time decisions in dual-channel supply chains , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  John J. Liu,et al.  Competitive pricing of mixed retail and e-tail distribution channels , 2005 .

[11]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Models for Supply Chains in E-Business , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[12]  G. Cai,et al.  Channel Selection and Coordination in Dual-Channel Supply Chains , 2010 .

[13]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Coordinating Traditional and Internet Supply Chains , 2004 .

[14]  ChiangWei-yu Kevin,et al.  Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design , 2003 .

[15]  G. Cai,et al.  Game theoretical perspectives on dual-channel supply chain competition with price discounts and pricing schemes , 2009 .

[16]  GILA E. FRUCHTER,et al.  Dynamic Online and Offline Channel Pricing for Heterogeneous Customers in Virtual Acceptance , 2005, IGTR.

[17]  Andy A. Tsay,et al.  Channel Dynamics Under Price and Service Competition , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[18]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Opportunities and challenges in multichannel marketing: An introduction to the special issue , 2005 .

[19]  Jo van Nunen,et al.  E-fulfillment and multi-channel distribution - A review , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Boiling Frogs: Pricing Strategies for a Manufacturer Adding a Direct Channel that Competes with the Traditional Channel , 2006 .

[21]  Ying Sun,et al.  Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain , 2012, Omega.

[22]  F. Sotgiu,et al.  The Drivers of E-tailers' Price Levels , 2005 .