Explaining the variety in smart eco city development in China-What policy network theory can teach us about overcoming barriers in implementation?

The Pearl River Delta (PRD) is one of the largest and fastest growing urbanized deltas in China and the world. Its municipalities hope to attract investors, firms, high-quality labour force and residents in line with ecological modernization. They do so by using a variety of attractive city labels, such as eco city, low carbon city, and smart city. The physical shape these city labels take is best exemplified in the emergence of large new towns at the fringes of existing urban areas. Few studies to date unearth empirical evidence as to how municipal governments in China implement their smart eco city ambitions. This study does precisely that by examining how concrete policy networks at the local level develop new towns in the Pearl River Delta. The Policy Network Theory is used to map the positions actors have in three different new town projects in Shenzhen, Foshan, and Zhuhai respectively. It explains project progress or lack thereof by studying the organizational constellations that structure the interactions among actors and how the constellations affect their resources exchange. Our analysis suggests that in the various arenas where policy actors meet each other and are supposed to exchange resources and work out viable policy packages, blockades exist preventing such exchanges from happening. This creates impasses to which different cities have found different institutional and organizational answers.

[1]  Li Yu,et al.  Eco city development in China: addressing the policy implementation challenge , 2016 .

[2]  Philip Berke,et al.  What Makes a Good Sustainable Development Plan? An Analysis of Factors That Influence Principles of Sustainable Development , 2004 .

[3]  David Marsh,et al.  Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach , 2000 .

[4]  B. Jessop,et al.  An Entrepreneurial City in Action: Hong Kong's Emerging Strategies in and for (Inter)Urban Competition , 2000 .

[5]  M. Jong,et al.  Financing Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City: What Lessons Can Be Drawn for Other Large-Scale Sustainable City-Projects? , 2017 .

[6]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  Organizing Babylon ‐ On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks , 1998 .

[7]  Fulong Wu China's recent urban development in the process of land and housing marketisation and economic globalisation , 2001 .

[8]  Leonidas Anthopoulos,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: A Tool for Smart Government or an Industrial Trick? , 2017 .

[9]  Simon Joss,et al.  Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization , 2015 .

[10]  Richard Hu,et al.  Planning for growth: urban and regional planning in China , 2016 .

[11]  Jean C. Oi The Role of the Local State in China's Transitional Economy , 1995, The China Quarterly.

[12]  Arthur P. Molella,et al.  The Eco-City as Urban Technology: Perspectives on Caofeidian International Eco-City (China) , 2013 .

[13]  Fulong Wu China’s eco-cities , 2012 .

[14]  C. Snell,et al.  ACTIVATING POLICY NETWORKS , 2007 .

[15]  Jieming Zhu,et al.  Local Growth Coalition: The Context and Implications of China's Gradualist Urban Land Reforms , 1999 .

[16]  M. de Jong,et al.  Applying policy network theory to policy-making in China: the case of urban health insurance reform. , 2010, Public administration.

[17]  Policy Networks and Policy Paradigm Shifts: urban housing policy development in China , 2013 .

[18]  Martin de Jong,et al.  Financing eco cities and low carbon cities: The case of Shenzhen International Low Carbon City , 2018 .

[19]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Governance of Sustainable Development: Taking Stock and Looking Forwards , 2008 .

[20]  Geert Teisman,et al.  Models For Research into Decision-MakingProcesses: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds , 2000 .

[21]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  A literature review of historical trends and emerging theoretical approaches for developing sustainable cities (part 1) , 2015 .

[22]  Haiyan Lu,et al.  Economic City Branding in China: the Multi-Level Governance of Municipal Self-Promotion in the Greater Pearl River Delta , 2017 .

[23]  Keith Dowding,et al.  Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach , 1995 .

[24]  C. Hood,et al.  The tools of government in the digital age , 2007 .

[25]  You-tien Hsing,et al.  Book Review: The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China , 2010 .

[26]  Signy Irene Vabo,et al.  Conceptualizing the Tools of Government in Urban Network Governance , 2012 .

[27]  Federico Caprotti Critical research on eco-cities? A walk through the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City, China , 2014 .

[28]  B. Frostell,et al.  Analysis of sustainable urban development approaches in China , 2014 .

[29]  Sumei Zhang,et al.  Land-centered urban politics in transitional China – Can they be explained by Growth Machine Theory? , 2014 .

[30]  Tingwei Zhang Urban Development and a Socialist Pro-Growth Coalition in Shanghai , 2002 .

[31]  Amy Rader Olsson,et al.  The role of local governance and environmental policy integration in Swedish and Chinese eco-city development , 2016 .

[32]  J. F. M. Koppenjan,et al.  Public Management and Policy Networks , 2000 .

[33]  David Fridley,et al.  China's pilot low-carbon city initiative: A comparative assessment of national goals and local plans , 2014 .

[34]  G. Dai The impact of policy networks on the urbanisation around High-Speed Railway stations in China: the case of Wuhan , 2015 .

[35]  Dan Yang,et al.  Dilemmas of Local Governance under the Development Zone Fever in China: A Case Study of the Suzhou Region , 2008 .

[36]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective , 2003 .

[37]  M. de Jong,et al.  Path Dependence in Financing Urban Infrastructure Development in China: 1949–2016 , 2017 .

[38]  Simon Joss,et al.  ECO-CITIES: THE MAINSTREAMING OF URBAN SUSTAINABILITY – KEY CHARACTERISTICS AND DRIVING FACTORS , 2011 .

[39]  Fulong Wu The (Post-) Socialist Entrepreneurial City as a State Project: Shanghai's Reglobalisation in Question , 2003 .

[40]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Towards governing infrasystem transitions: Reinforcing lock-in or facilitating change? , 2010 .

[41]  I. Bache Government within Governance: Network Steering in Yorkshire and the Humber , 2000 .

[42]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Trajectory of urban sustainability concepts: A 35-year bibliometric analysis , 2017 .

[43]  P. McGuirk Power and Policy Networks in Urban Governance: Local Government and Property-led Regeneration in Dublin , 2000 .

[44]  Y Sun,et al.  Facilitating generation of local knowledge using a collaborative initiator: A NIMBY case in Guangzhou, China , 2015 .

[45]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Policy Instruments for Steering Autopoietic Actors , 1991 .

[46]  Yoonseuk Woo Two Tails of Housing-led Urban Regeneration Policy Network: The UK and South Korea , 2014 .

[47]  Laurence J. C. Ma Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China , 2005 .

[48]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks , 1996 .

[49]  C. Pow,et al.  Modelling green urbanism in China , 2015 .

[50]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[51]  T. Firman New town development in Jakarta Metropolitan Region: a perspective of spatial segregation , 2004 .

[52]  Evaluating China's pilot low- carbon city initiative: national goals and local plans , 2013 .

[53]  Maria Manta Conroy,et al.  Moving the Middle Ahead , 2006 .

[54]  Arthur P.J. Mol,et al.  Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review , 2000 .

[55]  Zhaoyu Zhu,et al.  Assessing Impact of Urbanization on River Water Quality In The Pearl River Delta Economic Zone, China , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[56]  G. V. Bortel,et al.  Network governance in action: the case of Groningen complex decision-making in urban regeneration , 2009 .

[57]  Xufeng Zhu POLICY CHANGE AND EXPERT INVOLVEMENT IN CHINA , 2013 .

[58]  Reza Hasmath,et al.  The Local Corporatist State and NGO Relations in China , 2014 .

[59]  Eric Sheppard,et al.  China's Eco-Cities as Variegated1 Urban Sustainability: Dongtan Eco-City and Chongming Eco-Island , 2013 .

[60]  K. Ward,et al.  From the 'new localism' to the 'new regionalism'? The implications of regional development agencies for city-regional relations , 2000 .

[61]  Rosamond Rhodes,et al.  Policy Networks , 1990 .

[62]  R. Rhodes,et al.  Policy Network Analysis , 2008 .

[63]  Graeme Lang,et al.  A Tale of Two Eco-Cities: Experimentation under Hierarchy in Shanghai and Tianjin , 2015 .

[64]  A. Hult,et al.  Swedish Production of Sustainable Urban Imaginaries in China , 2013 .

[65]  Jean C. Oi Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China , 1992, World Politics.

[66]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Advancing Sustainable Urban Transformation , 2011 .

[67]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Planning for sustainable cities? A comparative content analysis of the master plans of eco, low-carbon and conventional new towns in China , 2017 .