A Mathematical Theory of Interpersonal Interactions and Group Behavior.

Emergent collective group processes and capabilities have been studied through analysis of transactive memory, measures of group task performance, and group intelligence, among others. In their approach to collective behaviors, these approaches transcend traditional studies of group decision making that focus on how individual preferences combine through power relationships, social choice by voting, negotiation and game theory. Understanding more generally how individuals contribute to group effectiveness is important to a broad set of social challenges. Here we formalize a dynamic theory of interpersonal communications that classifies individual acts, sequences of actions, group behavioral patterns, and individuals engaged in group decision making. Group decision making occurs through a sequence of communications that convey personal attitudes and preferences among members of the group. The resulting formalism is relevant to psychosocial behavior analysis, rules of order, organizational structures and personality types, as well as formalized systems such as social choice theory. More centrally, it provides a framework for quantifying and even anticipating the structure of informal dialog, allowing specific conversations to be coded and analyzed in relation to a quantitative model of the participating individuals and the parameters that govern their interactions.

[1]  Daniel Levi,et al.  Group Dynamics for Teams , 2020 .

[2]  Y. Bar-Yam Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[3]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Power and Leadership: A Complex Systems Science Approach Part I - Representation and Dynamics , 2018, ArXiv.

[4]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Negative representation and instability in democratic elections , 2018, ArXiv.

[5]  Dan Braha,et al.  Anticipating Economic Market Crises Using Measures of Collective Panic , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  J. M. de la Torre-Ruiz,et al.  Team Decision Making and Individual Satisfaction With the Team , 2014 .

[7]  K. Jehn,et al.  The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Timothy M. Waring Cooperation Dynamics in a Multiethnic Society , 2012, Current Anthropology.

[9]  Karl Aquino,et al.  A Social Context Model of Envy and Social Undermining , 2012 .

[10]  이재복 의사 간호사 communication , 2011 .

[11]  Ad Kleingeld,et al.  The effect of goal setting on group performance: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  J. Shaw,et al.  A contingency model of conflict and team effectiveness. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct , 2010 .

[14]  Yves R. F. Guillaume,et al.  Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs , 2008 .

[15]  H. M. Robert Pocket Manual of Rules of Order for Deliberative Assemblies , 2008 .

[16]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[17]  David A Harrison,et al.  Do Peers Make the Place? Conceptual Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Coworker Effects on Perceptions, Attitudes, OCBs, and Performance , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  J. Levine,et al.  Small Groups: An Overview , 2008 .

[19]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time , 2007, MIS Q..

[20]  S. K. Horwitz,et al.  The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography , 2007 .

[21]  M. Mann El poder autónomo del estado: sus orígenes, mecanismos y resultados , 2007, Relaciones Internacionales.

[22]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Work group diversity. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  C. Brotheridge,et al.  Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility , 2005 .

[24]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Kyle Lewis,et al.  Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[28]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  John R. Austin Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Kyle Lewis Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  Making the Team: A Guide for Managers , 2003 .

[34]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[36]  Daniel C. Ganster,et al.  Social Undermining in the Workplace , 2002 .

[37]  T. Risse “Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics , 2000, International Organization.

[38]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[39]  Jason D. Shaw,et al.  Performance and Satisfaction in Conflicted Interdependent Groups: When and How Does Self-Esteem Make a Difference? , 2000 .

[40]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[41]  R. Moreland Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. , 1999 .

[42]  K. Dirks The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  An Organizational Memory Approach to Information Management , 1998 .

[44]  A. Hollingshead Communication, Learning, and Retrieval in Transactive Memory Systems☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[45]  A. Hollingshead Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[46]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance , 1994 .

[47]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[48]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[49]  D. Eden,et al.  Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? , 1985 .

[50]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[51]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[52]  H. L. Davis,et al.  Decision Making within the Household , 1976 .

[53]  M. Satterthwaite Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions , 1975 .

[54]  A. Gibbard Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .

[55]  H. Berg,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by Three-dimensional Tracking , 1972, Nature.

[56]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[57]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. , 1958 .

[58]  MAURICE BRUCE,et al.  Leviathan or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiasticall and Civil The Second Treatise of Civil Government, and a Letter concerning Toleration On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government Prophets and Peoples Politics and Morals , 1947, Nature.

[59]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Smart groups of smart people: Evidence for IQ as the origin of collective intelligence in the performance of human groups , 2017 .

[60]  M. Baretich Reading Room. , 2016, Biomedical instrumentation & technology / Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.

[61]  Timothy M. Waring Reports Cooperation Dynamics in a Multiethnic Society A Case Study from Tamil Nadu , 2012 .

[62]  David Hirshleifer,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[63]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[64]  M. Brauer,et al.  Social power , 2006 .

[65]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models , 2005 .

[66]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[67]  H. Klein,et al.  Two Investigations of the Relationships among Group Goals, Goal Commitment, Cohesion, and Performance , 1995 .

[68]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[69]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[70]  M. Mann The sources of social power: Index , 1986 .

[71]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in , 1981 .

[72]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[73]  W. Edwards Behavioral decision theory. , 1961, Annual review of psychology.

[74]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[75]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[76]  A. Woolley Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .