Investigating the link between intellectual capital and open innovation processes: a longitudinal case study

PurposeThis paper investigates the link between Intellectual Capital (IC) and Open Innovation (OI). Scholars worldwide consider the topics as standing alone and so they give scarce attention to the possible link between them. Managerial experiences (and few theoretical contributions), instead, hypothesize a significant role that IC can play over OI processes in order make them successful.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology of a single case study is used to investigate the link between IC and OI. In particular, an OI process managed by a global company, LEGO, and named Mindstorms is rebuilt and analysed herein.FindingsIntermediate results achieved by LEGO through its OI process were unsuccessful since the company had not developed its own IC (made up of relational, human and structural capital). The subsequent development of IC, instead, has driven to successful results. This suggests that if companies do not develop their IC before launching OI processes, then these processes might be not successful.Research limitations/implicationsOne limitation is the use of a single case study. Despite this, the present article is a warning for all the companies: before launching OI processes they need to develop their IC.Originality/valueTo the best knowledge of the authors, this is one of the first works that deepens the investigation of the link between IC and OI. Very often, scholars investigating IC shyly refer to OI, without mentioning it, while the scholars investigating OI allude to IC, without citing it. In this study, IC and OI are investigated together.

[1]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[3]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[4]  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[5]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[6]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[7]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[8]  N. Bontis.  Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models , 1998 .

[9]  N. Bontis,et al.  THE KNOWLEDGE TOOLBOX: A Review of the Tools Available To Measure and Manage Intangible Resources , 1999 .

[10]  Patrick H. Sullivan,et al.  Profiting from intellectual capital , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  N. Brennan,et al.  Intellectual Capital: Current Issues and Policy Implications , 2000 .

[12]  N. Bontis,et al.  Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries , 2000 .

[13]  R. Petty,et al.  INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL LITERATURE REVIEW: MEASUREMENT, REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[14]  G. Roos,et al.  Intellectual capital analysis as a strategic tool , 2002 .

[15]  N. Bontis.  Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital , 2001 .

[16]  G. Roos,et al.  Intellectual capital analysis as a strategic tool , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[17]  Frank Klassner,et al.  A case study of LEGO Mindstorms'#8482; suitability for artificial intelligence and robotics courses at the college level , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[18]  I. Peña.  Intellectual capital and business start‐up success , 2002 .

[19]  F. Klassner.  A case study of LEGO Mindstorms' suitability for artificial intelligence and robotics courses at the college level , 2002, SIGCSE.

[20]  M. McElroy.  Social innovation capital , 2002 .

[21]  KlassnerFrank.  A case study of LEGO Mindstorms' suitability for artificial intelligence and robotics courses at the college level , 2002 .

[22]  Lutz Kaufmann,et al.  Intangibles: A synthesis of current research , 2004 .

[23]  H. Chesbrough.  Managing Open Innovation , 2004 .

[24]  Aviv Shoham.  Flow experiences and image making: An online chat‐room ethnography , 2004 .

[25]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[26]  J. Hayton.  Competing in the New Economy: The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Corporate Entrepreneurship in High-Technology New Ventures , 2005 .

[27]  Suresh Cuganesan,et al.  An integrated framework for visualising intellectual capital , 2005 .

[28]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[29]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[30]  Valeriano Álvarez Cabal,et al.  An integrated framework for intellectual capital measurement and knowledge management implementation in small and medium-sized enterprises , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[31]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[32]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[33]  J. Cullen,et al.  Reflections on the use of case studies in the accounting, management and organizational disciplines , 2007 .

[34]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[35]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation and Strategy , 2007 .

[36]  G. Tovstiga,et al.  Intellectual capital practices and performance in Russian enterprises , 2007 .

[37]  D. Zwick,et al.  Putting Consumers to Work , 2008 .

[38]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[39]  Wann‐Yih Wu,et al.  Promoting Innovation through the Accumulation of Intellectual Capital, Social Capital, and Entrepreneurial Orientation , 2008 .

[40]  Pamela Baxter,et al.  Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers , 2008 .

[41]  Ya-Hui Hsu,et al.  Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability , 2009 .

[42]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2009 .

[43]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[44]  A. Link,et al.  Public knowledge, private knowledge: the intellectual capital of entrepreneurs , 2009 .

[45]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects , 2009 .

[46]  S. Ollila,et al.  Exploring the field of open innovation , 2009 .

[47]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[48]  Jeffrey Phillips.  Open Innovation Typology , 2010 .

[49]  Robin Teigland,et al.  How Internet Technologies Impact Information Flows in R&D: Reconsidering the Technological Gatekeeper , 2010 .

[50]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Sentiment in short strength detection informal text , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[51]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sentiment in short strength detection informal text , 2010 .

[52]  M. Hatch,et al.  Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance , 2010 .

[53]  B. Cassiman,et al.  What is open innovation, really? , 2011 .

[54]  Abu Hassan Bin Md. Isa,et al.  Intellectual Capital and Its Major Components , 2011 .

[55]  Khuong Nguyen.  A case study on the usability of NXT-G programming language , 2011, PPIG.

[56]  Agustín J. Sánchez-Medina,et al.  The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures , 2011 .

[57]  Irene Pollach,et al.  Taming Textual Data: The Contribution of Corpus Linguistics to Computer-Aided Text Analysis , 2012 .

[58]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going , 2012 .

[59]  Martina Musteen,et al.  Beyond Cost: The Role of Intellectual Capital in Offshoring and Innovation in Young Firms , 2013 .

[60]  J. Hassard,et al.  Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory , 2014 .

[61]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  Managing the intellectual capital within government-university-industry R&D partnerships : A framework for the engineering research centers , 2014 .

[62]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Antecedents of Open Business Models: An Exploratory Study of Incumbent Firms , 2014 .

[63]  Mauro Caputo,et al.  Measurement of open innovation through intellectual capital flows: framework and application , 2014 .

[64]  F. Calza,et al.  The intellectual capital of business incubators , 2014 .

[65]  Jamal Abdul Nassir Shaari,et al.  Intellectual capital in small and medium enterprises in Pakistan , 2015 .

[66]  Lina Užienė.  Open Innovation, Knowledge Flows and Intellectual Capital , 2015 .

[67]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  Open Innovation 2.0: Is Co-Creation the Ultimate Challenge? , 2015, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[68]  D. Matricano.  The impact of intellectual capital on start-up expectations , 2016 .

[69]  A. Kianto,et al.  Intellectual capital, knowledge management practices and firm performance , 2017 .

[70]  A. Nosella,et al.  Enhancing radical innovation performance through intellectual capital components , 2017 .

[71]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  A systematic approach to conducting review studies: An assessment of content analysis in 25years of IB research , 2017 .

[72]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  Knowledge-driven preferences in informal inbound open innovation modes. An explorative view on small to medium enterprises , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[73]  J. Kratzer,et al.  Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference , 2017 .

[74]  J. Raab,et al.  Powell (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[75]  Mohammed T. Abusharbeh,et al.  The Impact of Motivations on Employees Performance: Case Study from Palestinian Commercial Banks , 2018 .

[76]  H. Alves,et al.  Back to the future of intellectual capital research: a systematic literature review , 2018, Management Decision.

[77]  Peter Miskell.  Reflections on the integration of history and organization studies , 2018, Management & Organizational History.

[78]  P. Pels,et al.  Guidelines for data management and scientific integrity in ethnography , 2019, Ethnography.

[79]  D. Matricano,et al.  Top Management Involvement in Open Innovation Processes: Learning from a Global Carmaker , 2018, International Business Research.

[80]  D. Lehn,et al.  Phenomenology‐Based Ethnography for Management Studies and Organizational Analysis , 2019 .

[81]  M. Bogers,et al.  Employee-level open innovation in emerging markets: linking internal, external, and managerial resources , 2019, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

[82]  N. Jennings.  “It’s All About the Brick”: Mobilizing Adult Fans of LEGO , 2019, Cultural Studies of LEGO.

[83]  D. V. Lehn,et al.  Phenomenology‐Based Ethnography for Management Studies and Organizational Analysis , 2019 .

[84]  S. Ulubeyli,et al.  Intellectual capital based reputation for market internationalization , 2019 .

[85]  R. Agrawal,et al.  Scale development and modeling of intellectual property creation capability in higher education , 2019 .

[86]  P. Andersen,et al.  Organizational interfaces and innovation: The challenge of integrating supplier knowledge in LEGO systems , 2019, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management.

[87]  Diego Matricano,et al.  Absorbing in-bound knowledge within open innovation processes. The case of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[88]  Shujaat Mubarik,et al.  Intellectual capital and business performance: the role of dimensions of absorptive capacity , 2019, Journal of Intellectual Capital.

[89]  Bablu Kumar Dhar.  DETERMINING EFFECTIVE DIMENSIONS OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL , 2019 .

[90]  Ibticem Ben Zammel,et al.  Intellectual Capital Impact on Open Innovation: The Case of Technology-Based Sectors in Tunisia , 2020, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management.

[91]  Rachel Parker,et al.  Factors driving or impeding the diffusion and adoption of innovation in mining: A systematic review of the literature , 2020 .

[92]  M. Ingiriis.  The big elephant in the room , 2020, Regional Economic Communities and Peacebuilding in Africa.

[93]  L. Cricelli,et al.  Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm , 2020, Journal of Business Research.