Inheritance of Occlusal Topography: A Twin Study

SummaryAim: This was to determine the relative contribution of genetic factors on the morphology of occlusal surfaces of mandibular primary first molars by employing the twin study model. Methods: The occlusal morphology of mandibular primary first molar teeth from dental casts of 9 monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs and 12 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs 4 to 7 years old, were digitized by contact-type three-dimensional (3D) scanner. To compare the similarity of occlusal morphology between twin sets, each twin pair of occlusal surfaces was superimposed to establish the best fit by using computerized least squared techniques. Heritability was computed using a variance component model, adjusted for age and gender. Results: DZ pairs demonstrated a greater degree of occlusal morphology variance. The total amount of difference in surface overlap was 0.0508 mm (0.0018 (inches) for the MZ (n=18) sample and 0.095 mm (0.0034 inches) for the DZ (n=24) sample and were not statistically significant (p=0.2203). The transformed mean differences were not statistically significantly different (p=0.2203). Heritability estimates of occlusal surface areas for right and left mandibular primary first molars were 97.5% and 98.2% (p<0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: Occlusal morphology of DZ twin pairs was more variable than that of MZ twin pairs. Heritability estimates revealed that genetic factors strongly influence occlusal morphology of mandibular primary first molars.

[1]  I. Thesleff,et al.  Evidence for the role of the enamel knot as a control center in mammalian tooth cusp formation: non-dividing cells express growth stimulating Fgf-4 gene. , 1994, The International journal of developmental biology.

[2]  R. H. Biggerstaff Heritability of the Carabelli Cusp in Twins , 1973, Journal of dental research.

[3]  H. Jung,et al.  Genotype, phenotype, and developmental biology of molar tooth characters. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  P. Sharpe,et al.  Normal and abnormal dental development. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[5]  P. Dempsey,et al.  Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in human tooth size , 2001, Heredity.

[6]  Han-Sung Jung,et al.  Patterning the size and number of tooth and its cusps. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[7]  M. Gorry,et al.  Evidence of a founder effect for four cathepsin C gene mutations in Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome patients , 2001, Journal of medical genetics.

[8]  L. Almasy,et al.  Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  S. Keränen,et al.  The life history of an embryonic signaling center: BMP-4 induces p21 and is associated with apoptosis in the mouse tooth enamel knot. , 1998, Development.

[10]  V. Jovanovski,et al.  Tooth size and morphology in twins. , 2001, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[11]  L. Messer,et al.  A Genetic Contribution to Dental Caries, Occlusion, and Morphology as Demonstrated by Twins Reared Apart , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[12]  N. M. Huber Ponderal index and height. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  T. Hart,et al.  The genome projects: implications for dental practice and education. , 2002, Journal of dental education.

[14]  Jimmy R.Pinkham,et al.  Pediatric dentistry: Infancy through adolescence , 1988 .

[15]  G. Townsend,et al.  Molar Intercuspal Dimensions: Genetic Input to Phenotypic Variation , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[16]  S. Keränen,et al.  The enamel knot as a signaling center in the developing mouse tooth , 1996, Mechanisms of Development.