Cytocompatibility of periodontal dressing materials in fibroblast and primary human osteoblast-like cultures

Abstract Purpose of this investigation was to determine the cytocompatibility of various periodontal dressing materials by means of human primary gingival fibroblasts (HGF), human osteoblast-like cells (HObl) derived from the alveolar bone, and permanent 3T3 mouse fibroblasts (3T3). Cell culture medium extracts (time periods of extraction: day 1 and between day 2 and day 8 after setting) as well as solid specimens of the following materials were investigated: Coe-pak, Voco pac, Peripac, and Barricaid. Responses of cultures exposed for 24 h and 48 h to these materials were monitored by the fluorescent dyes H33342 and sulforhodamin 101 as well as by light microscopy. It was found that most extracts of Voco pac, Peripac, and Barricaid did not inhibit growth of HGF. Coe-Pak, however, clearly reduced the proliferation of HGF compared to untreated controls. Peripac decreased growth of HObl whereas Coe-Pak, Voco pac, and Barricaid caused no cytotoxic alterations in any of the test assays. Contrary to HGF and HObl, 3T3 cells were much more irritated by the test materials. But the light-curing resinous material Barricaid reduced proliferation of 3T3-fibroblasts only slightly. Our data indicate that Barricaid is exceedingly cytocompatible, whereas all other materials revealed moderate or severe cytotoxic effects according to the cell type.

[1]  F. Rivera‐Hidalgo,et al.  Effect of soluble extracts from periodontal dressings on human granulocytic leukocytes in vitro. , 1977, Journal of periodontology.

[2]  C. Lloyd,et al.  The effect of a light-cured periodontal dressing material on HeLa cells and fibroblasts in vitro. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  A. Hensten-Pettersen,et al.  The Sensitizing Potential of Periodontal Dressings , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[4]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Effects of extraction media upon fluoride release from a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement , 1998, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[5]  M. Bruze Systemically induced contact dermatitis from dental rosin. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[6]  D. Smith A materialistic look at periodontal packs. , 1970, The Dental practitioner and dental record.

[7]  M. Bruze,et al.  Contact allergy to Duraphat. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[8]  G. Leyhausen,et al.  Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers/additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblast cultures. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  P. Robey,et al.  Human bone cells in vitro. , 1985, Calcified tissue international.

[10]  J. Maltha,et al.  Histological evaluation of surgically treated oral tissues after application of a photocuring periodontal dressing material. An animal study. , 1992, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[11]  G. Schmalz,et al.  Concepts in biocompatibility testing of dental restorative materials , 1998, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[12]  M. Addy,et al.  The use of chlorhexidine mouthwash compared with a periodontal dressing following the gingivectomy procedure. , 1976, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  R. Caffesse,et al.  Connective Tissue Response to Periodontal Dressings. , 1980, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  N. Jacobsen,et al.  Possible side effects related to dental hygienists' treatment. , 1994, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[15]  G. Schmalz The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[16]  L. A. Skoglund,et al.  Effect of non-eugenol- and eugenol-containing periodontal dressings on the incidence and severity of pain after periodontal soft tissue surgery. , 1990, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  E. Haugen,et al.  In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Periodontal Dressings , 1978, Journal of dental research.

[18]  C. Shuler,et al.  Effect of periodontal dressings on human gingiva fibroblasts in vitro. , 1989, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  G. Nyquist,et al.  Contact allergy to medicaments and materials used in dentistry. II. Sensitivity to eugenol and colophony. , 1971, Odontologisk revy.

[20]  G. Hallmans,et al.  The protective effect of zinc on rosin and resin acid toxicity in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes and human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  E. Greener,et al.  Physical properties of periodontal dressing materials. , 1986, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.

[22]  H. Cheung,et al.  Growth of osteoblasts on porous calcium phosphate ceramic: an in vitro model for biocompatibility study. , 1989, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. G. Craig,et al.  Setting Reactions and Compressive Strengths of Calcium Phosphate Cements , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[24]  D. Rs Residual monomer/additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers. , 1999 .

[25]  E. Greener,et al.  Physical properties of an experimental periodontal dressing material. , 1985, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[26]  F. Derenzis,et al.  Effect of periodontal dressings on fibroblasts in vitro. , 1974, Journal of periodontal research.

[27]  M. Barkin,et al.  Acute allergic reaction to eugenol. , 1984, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[28]  H. Loe,et al.  Tissue reactions to a new gingivectomy pack. , 1961, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[29]  T. O'Neil Antibacterial properties of periodontal dressings. , 1975, Journal of periodontology.

[30]  H Budzikiewicz,et al.  Determination of leachable components from four commercial dental composites by gas and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[31]  H. Budzikiewicz,et al.  Qualitative analysis of dental resin composites by gas and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry , 1994 .