Family consent, communication, and advance directives for cancer disclosure: a Japanese case and discussion.

The dilemma of whether and how to disclose a diagnosis of cancer or of any other terminal illness continues to be a subject of worldwide interest. We present the case of a 62-year-old Japanese woman afflicted with advanced gall bladder cancer who had previously expressed a preference not to be told a diagnosis of cancer. The treating physician revealed the diagnosis to the family first, and then told the patient: "You don't have any cancer yet, but if we don't treat you, it will progress to a cancer". In our analysis, we examine the role of family consent, communication patterns (including ambiguous disclosure), and advance directives for cancer disclosure in Japan. Finally, we explore the implications for Edmund Pellegrino's proposal of "something close to autonomy" as a universal good.

[1]  N. Higuchi.  The patient's right to know of a cancer diagnosis: a comparison of Japanese paternalism and American self-determination. , 1992, Washburn law journal.

[2]  B. Freedman.  Offering truth. One ethical approach to the uninformed cancer patient. , 1993, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  Y. Mizushima,et al.  A survey regarding the disclosure of the diagnosis of cancer in Toyama Prefecture, Japan. , 1990, Japanese journal of medicine.

[4]  A. Surbone.  Truth telling to the patient. , 1992, JAMA.

[5]  B. Good,et al.  American oncology and the discourse on hope , 1990, Culture, medicine and psychiatry.

[6]  J. Holland,et al.  Psychosocial issues: An international survey of physician attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer , 1987 .

[7]  P. Marshall,et al.  Cross-cultural considerations in clinical ethics consultations. , 1995, Archives of family medicine.

[8]  K. Katsouyanni,et al.  Attitudes of a Mediterranean population to the truth-telling issue. , 1992, Journal of medical ethics.

[9]  M. Fetters,et al.  Cancer disclosure in Japan: historical comparisons, current practices. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[10]  A. Asai.  Should physicians tell patients the truth? , 1995, The Western journal of medicine.

[11]  G. Burn.  From Paper to Practice: Quality of Life in a Developing Country. , 1997, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  L. Forrow,et al.  Physicians' attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problems. , 1989, JAMA.

[13]  M. Fetters.  The Family in Medical Decision Making: Japanese Perspectives , 1998, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[14]  A. Surbone,et al.  Communication with the cancer patient : information and truth , 1997 .

[15]  N. Viñolas,et al.  Cancer diagnosis disclosure in a Spanish hospital. , 1992, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  S. Long,et al.  Curable cancers and fatal ulcers. Attitudes toward cancer in Japan. , 1982, Social science & medicine.

[17]  H. Wulff,et al.  What do gastroenterologists in Europe tell cancer patients? , 1993, The Lancet.

[18]  J. Chou,et al.  Communication with the Cancer Patient in China , 1997, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  N. Tanida.  Japanese Attitudes towards Truth Disclosure in Cancer , 1994, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[20]  G. Galanti.  Caring for patients from different cultures : case studies from American hospitals , 1991 .

[21]  E. Pellegrino.  Is truth telling to the patient a cultural artifact? , 1992, JAMA.

[22]  E. Pellegrino.  Intersections of Western Biomedical Ethics and World Culture: Problematic and Possibility , 1992, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[23]  M. al-Kaabi,et al.  Should doctors inform terminally ill patients? The opinions of nationals and doctors in the United Arab Emirates. , 1997, Journal of medical ethics.

[24]  N. Miyaji,et al.  The power of compassion: truth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients. , 1993, Social science & medicine.