The Implications of Culture and Identity: A Professor's Engagement with a Reform Collaborative

In this study, part of a larger United States project investigating K16 teachers and science reform, we seek to understand how a science professor's participation in a large-scale reform effort affects her conceptions of teaching, teachers, and reform. The topic in this study concerned how the professor's teaching identity was modified and created by the reform effort as she mediated her participation. A multiple-method approach utilizing (a) semi-structured interviews/correspondences with four students and the professor, (b) classroom observations, and (c) field notes, comprised the data collection. Results indicated that, although the professor was inclined to “try out” new teaching strategies in her classroom, the project failed to create pedagogical dissonance thus leading to her lack of desire to accommodate a more inquiry-based pedagogy.

[1]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Decision Making in the Practical Domain: A Model of Practical Conceptual Change , 2000 .

[2]  C. Mcrobbie,et al.  Cultural Myths as Constraints to the Enacted Science Curriculum , 1996 .

[3]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[4]  M Quinn Patton,et al.  Book Review: Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[5]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[6]  Jenifer V. Helms.  Science—and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers , 1998 .

[7]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Wearing the Letter Jacket: Legitimate Participation in a Collaborative Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Reform Project , 2003 .

[8]  J. Searle.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[9]  A. Feldman.  The Role of Conversation in Collaborative Action Research , 1999 .

[10]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[11]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[12]  A. Feldman.  Varieties of wisdom in the practice of teachers , 1997 .

[13]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[14]  R. Yuretich,et al.  Active-Learning Methods to Improve Student Performance and Scientific Interest in a Large Introductory Oceanography Course , 2001 .

[15]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[16]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[17]  Linda L. Cronin-Jones.  Science Teacher Beliefs and Their Influence on Curriculum Implementation: Two Case Studies. , 1991 .

[18]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[19]  Gretchen Rossman,et al.  Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[20]  L. Shulman.  Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[21]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[22]  Allan Feldman,et al.  Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for the generation and sharing of knowledge and understanding in collaborative action research , 1996 .

[23]  T. Weiss.  Scientists researching teaching: Reforming science education and transforming practice , 2003 .

[24]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Ethnography: Step-by-Step , 1989 .

[25]  A. Reber.  The Penguin dictionary of psychology , 2002 .

[26]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .