Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT and low radiation dose: comparison between 55 and 165 mAs.

PURPOSE To prospectively compare the results of coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements obtained with 55- and 165-mAs electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional clinical study review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Fifty-one consecutive subjects (mean age, 59 years +/- 10) were scanned consecutively by using 165 and 55 mAs. For each examination, the number of lesions, total calcium score (TCS) calculated with Agatston algorithm (130-HU threshold), and calcium mass (in milligrams) were measured. Noise was measured by averaging 1 standard deviation of the CT attenuation values in five consecutive transverse sections of the ascending aorta. Paired t test and Pearson correlation were used to compare measurements between the examinations. RESULTS By using 55 mAs, CAC was detected (TCS > 0) in all 33 subjects in whom CAC was initially detected with 165 mAs. The mean values of CAC measures with 165 and 55 mAs, respectively, were as follows: number of lesions, 6.2 +/- 9.6 and 6.1 +/- 9.4; TCS, 123 +/- 223 and 126 +/- 225; and calcium mass, 23.25 mg +/- 43 and 24.25 mg +/- 44 (P value was not significant for all parameters). Significant high correlation was found between the two methods for all measures (r > 0.90, P < .01). Similar results were obtained with analysis by coronary vessel. Image noise was 9.3 HU +/- 2.1 with 165 mAs and 14.7 HU +/- 3.9 with 55 mAs (P < .001), with a parallel decrease in the volume CT dose index from 12 to 4 mGy. CONCLUSION Radiation dose can be reduced (eg, 55 mAs) for CAC detection and measurement at multi-detector row CT and provides results comparable to those obtained with 165 mAs.

[1]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation , 2002, European Radiology.

[2]  M. Motro,et al.  Calcium Channel Blocker Nifedipine Slows Down Progression of Coronary Calcification in Hypertensive Patients Compared With Diuretics , 2001, Hypertension.

[3]  V. Fuster,et al.  Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. , 1996, Circulation.

[4]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  Accelerated progression of coronary calcification: four-year follow-up in patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  J Simon,et al.  Detection of coronary calcifications: feasibility of dose reduction with a body weight-adapted examination protocol. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  W. Kalender,et al.  Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography , 2003, European Radiology.

[7]  A. Schmermund,et al.  Age and gender distribution of coronary artery calcium measured by four-slice computed tomography in 2,030 persons with no symptoms of coronary artery disease. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  K. Bae,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium with multi-detector row CT: assessing interscan variability with different tube currents pilot study. , 2003, Radiology.

[9]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  Annual progression of coronary artery calcium by spiral computed tomography in hypertensive patients without myocardial ischemia but with prominent atherosclerotic risk factors, in patients with previous angina pectoris or healed acute myocardial infarction, and in patients with coronary events duri , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT: in vitro assessment of effect of radiation dose. , 2002, Radiology.

[11]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  Tracking coronary calcification by using dual-section spiral CT: a 3-year follow-up. , 2000, Radiology.

[12]  Y. Itzchak,et al.  Double-helical CT as a new tool for tracking of allograft atherosclerosis in heart transplant recipients. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[13]  C. Higgins,et al.  Coronary sinus flow measurement by means of velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: validation by using flow probes in dogs. , 2000, Radiology.

[14]  V F Froelicher,et al.  American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.