Increased gait variability during robot-assisted walking is accompanied by increased sensorimotor brain activity in healthy people

BackgroundGait disorders are major symptoms of neurological diseases affecting the quality of life. Interventions that restore walking and allow patients to maintain safe and independent mobility are essential. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) proved to be a promising treatment for restoring and improving the ability to walk. Due to heterogenuous study designs and fragmentary knowlegde about the neural correlates associated with RAGT and the relation to motor recovery, guidelines for an individually optimized therapy can hardly be derived. To optimize robotic rehabilitation, it is crucial to understand how robotic assistance affect locomotor control and its underlying brain activity. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of robotic assistance (RA) during treadmill walking (TW) on cortical activity and the relationship between RA-related changes of cortical activity and biomechanical gait characteristics.MethodsTwelve healthy, right-handed volunteers (9 females; M = 25 ± 4 years) performed unassisted walking (UAW) and robot-assisted walking (RAW) trials on a treadmill, at 2.8 km/h, in a randomized, within-subject design. Ground reaction forces (GRFs) provided information regarding the individual gait patterns, while brain activity was examined by measuring cerebral hemodynamic changes in brain regions associated with the cortical locomotor network, including the sensorimotor cortex (SMC), premotor cortex (PMC) and supplementary motor area (SMA), using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).ResultsA statistically significant increase in brain activity was observed in the SMC compared with the PMC and SMA (p < 0.05), and a classical double bump in the vertical GRF was observed during both UAW and RAW throughout the stance phase. However, intraindividual gait variability increased significantly with RA and was correlated with increased brain activity in the SMC (p = 0.05; r = 0.57).ConclusionsOn the one hand, robotic guidance could generate sensory feedback that promotes active participation, leading to increased gait variability and somatosensory brain activity. On the other hand, changes in brain activity and biomechanical gait characteristics may also be due to the sensory feedback of the robot, which disrupts the cortical network of automated walking in healthy individuals. More comprehensive neurophysiological studies both in laboratory and in clinical settings are necessary to investigate the entire brain network associated with RAW.

[1]  I. Schwartz,et al.  Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized trial , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[2]  I. Tarkka,et al.  Asymmetry in walking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[4]  Valer Jurcak,et al.  10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: Their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems , 2007, NeuroImage.

[5]  Ho Jun Lee,et al.  Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Lucas H V van der Woude,et al.  Differences in muscle activity and temporal step parameters between Lokomat guided walking and treadmill walking in post-stroke hemiparetic patients and healthy walkers , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  Joseph H Friedman,et al.  Reduction of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease by repetitive robot-assisted treadmill training: a pilot study , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  Jacques Duysens,et al.  Cortical control of normal gait and precision stepping: An fNIRS study , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  William Z Rymer,et al.  Reducing robotic guidance during robot-assisted gait training improves gait function: a case report on a stroke survivor. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  B. Conway,et al.  The motor cortex drives the muscles during walking in human subjects , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Caterina Pesce,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Perception in Older Adults: The Joint Role of Cognitive Efficiency and Functional Mobility , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[12]  G M Earhart,et al.  Which measures of physical function and motor impairment best predict quality of life in Parkinson's disease? , 2011, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[13]  M. Lewek,et al.  Allowing Intralimb Kinematic Variability During Locomotor Training Poststroke Improves Kinematic Consistency: A Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[14]  M. Doppelmayr,et al.  Current State and Future Prospects of EEG and fNIRS in Robot-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation: A Brief Review , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  Cecilia Fagerström,et al.  Mobility, functional ability and health-related quality of life among people of 60 years or older , 2010, Aging clinical and experimental research.

[16]  D. Edwards,et al.  Gait training in human spinal cord injury using electromechanical systems: effect of device type and patient characteristics. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  EEG beta suppression and low gamma modulation are different elements of human upright walking , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  N. Paker,et al.  Lokomat: a therapeutic chance for patients with chronic hemiplegia. , 2014, NeuroRehabilitation.

[19]  Dario Farina,et al.  Effects of robotic guidance on the coordination of locomotion , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[20]  F. Müller,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Training With Assistance of a Robot-Driven Gait Orthosis in Hemiparetic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2007, Stroke.

[21]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Optimal Movement Variability: A New Theoretical Perspective for Neurologic Physical Therapy , 2006, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[22]  Dennis Hamacher,et al.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in movement science: a systematic review on cortical activity in postural and walking tasks , 2017, Neurophotonics.

[23]  F. Zajac,et al.  Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[24]  Marco Ferrari,et al.  Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) for Assessing Cerebral Cortex Function During Human Behavior in Natural/Social Situations: A Concise Review , 2019 .

[25]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  R. Lipton,et al.  Epidemiology of Gait Disorders in Community‐Residing Older Adults , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[27]  A. Villringer,et al.  Beyond the Visible—Imaging the Human Brain with Light , 2003, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  Meg E Morris,et al.  Determinants of health-related quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. , 2011, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[29]  Rob den Otter,et al.  The combined effects of guidance force, bodyweight support and gait speed on muscle activity during able-bodied walking in the Lokomat. , 2016, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  Ichiro Miyai,et al.  Prefrontal and premotor cortices are involved in adapting walking and running speed on the treadmill: an optical imaging study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[31]  Sabrina Brigadoi,et al.  Unleashing the future potential of functional near-infrared spectroscopy in brain sciences , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Peter Desain,et al.  Feasibility of measuring event Related Desynchronization with electroencephalography during walking , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  Daniel Hamacher,et al.  Brain activity during walking: A systematic review , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[34]  Bernhard Elsner,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  Hellmuth Obrig,et al.  Individual alpha-frequency correlates with amplitude of visual evoked potential and hemodynamic response , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[37]  B. Nigg,et al.  Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. , 1989, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Abnormal joint torque patterns exhibited by chronic stroke subjects while walking with a prescribed physiological gait pattern , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[39]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Limb Alignment and Kinematics Inside a Lokomat Robotic Orthosis , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[40]  Cordula Werner,et al.  Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[41]  I. Schwartz,et al.  Locomotor training using a robotic device in patients with subacute spinal cord injury , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[42]  Thomas Brandt,et al.  Real versus imagined locomotion: A [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison , 2010, NeuroImage.

[43]  R. Riener,et al.  Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[44]  S. Stuart,et al.  fNIRS response during walking — Artefact or cortical activity? A systematic review , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[45]  Chia-Feng Lu,et al.  Novel gait training alters functional brain connectivity during walking in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[46]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete spinal cord injury. , 1995, Journal of neurologic rehabilitation.

[47]  T. Hornby,et al.  Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[48]  Deog-Young Kim,et al.  Plantar Pressure Distribution During Robotic-Assisted Gait in Post-stroke Hemiplegic Patients , 2014, Annals of rehabilitation medicine.

[49]  Alessia Bramanti,et al.  Robotic gait rehabilitation and substitution devices in neurological disorders: where are we now? , 2016, Neurological Sciences.

[50]  C. Neuper,et al.  Robot Assisted Walking Affects the Synchrony Between Premotor and Somatosensory Areas , 2013, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[51]  C. Neuper,et al.  It's how you get there: walking down a virtual alley activates premotor and parietal areas , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[52]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Neurophysiology of Robot-Mediated Training and Therapy: A Perspective for Future Use in Clinical Populations , 2013, Front. Neurol..

[53]  F. Fregni,et al.  T107. Using Functional near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) to assess brain activity of spinal cord injury patient, during robot-assisted gait , 2018, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  J. Millán,et al.  Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[55]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  Prefrontal, posterior parietal and sensorimotor network activity underlying speed control during walking , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[56]  Eun Joo Kim,et al.  Best facilitated cortical activation during different stepping, treadmill, and robot-assisted walking training paradigms and speeds: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging study. , 2016, NeuroRehabilitation.

[57]  K. Kubota,et al.  Cortical Mapping of Gait in Humans: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Topography Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[58]  Tabea Aurich-Schuler,et al.  The FreeD module for the Lokomat facilitates a physiological movement pattern in healthy people – a proof of concept study , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[59]  D. Lefeber,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: Does Robotic Guidance Force Affect Gait-Related Brain Dynamics during Robot-Assisted Treadmill Walking? , 2015, PloS one.

[60]  J. Nielsen.  How we Walk: Central Control of Muscle Activity during Human Walking , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[61]  J. Hidler,et al.  Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[62]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Kinematic trajectories while walking within the Lokomat robotic gait-orthosis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[63]  G. J. Thomas.  The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements , 1967 .

[64]  A. Lo,et al.  Improving Gait in Multiple Sclerosis Using Robot-Assisted, Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[65]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[66]  Alessia Bramanti,et al.  What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[67]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[68]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff.  Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking. , 2007, Human movement science.

[69]  B. Conway,et al.  A portable gait assessment tool to record temporal gait parameters in SCI. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[70]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[71]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  Robert Riener,et al.  Locomotor training in subjects with sensori-motor deficits: An overview of the robotic gait orthosis lokomat , 2010 .

[73]  R. Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[74]  Harry L. Graber,et al.  nirsLAB: A Computing Environment for fNIRS Neuroimaging Data Analysis , 2014 .

[75]  C. Chisari,et al.  The effects of robot-assisted gait training in progressive multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[76]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[77]  Nicola Smania,et al.  Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Patients With Parkinson Disease , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[78]  Robert Riener,et al.  Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[79]  S. Beer,et al.  Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized trial , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[80]  R. Müller,et al.  Leg surface electromyography patterns in children with neuro-orthopedic disorders walking on a treadmill unassisted and assisted by a robot with and without encouragement , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[81]  V. L. Nickel,et al.  Gait parameters following stroke: a practical assessment. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[82]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Adaptability of stride-to-stride control of stepping movements in human walking. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[83]  Vahab Youssofzadeh,et al.  Directed neural connectivity changes in robot-assisted gait training: A partial Granger causality analysis , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[84]  Alberto Esquenazi,et al.  A Randomized Comparative Study of Manually Assisted Versus Robotic‐Assisted Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training in Persons With a Traumatic Brain Injury , 2013, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[85]  S. Stuart,et al.  Reduced Gait Variability and Enhanced Brain Activity in Older Adults With Auditory Cues: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study , 2018, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[86]  Tabea Aurich-Schuler,et al.  An Increase in Kinematic Freedom in the Lokomat Is Related to the Ability to Elicit a Physiological Muscle Activity Pattern: A Secondary Data Analysis Investigating Differences Between Guidance Force, Path Control, and FreeD , 2019, Front. Robot. AI.

[87]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Level of participation in robotic-assisted treadmill walking modulates midline sensorimotor EEG rhythms in able-bodied subjects , 2012, NeuroImage.

[88]  Titianova Eb,et al.  Asymmetry in walking performance and postural sway in patients with chronic unilateral cerebral infarction. , 1995 .

[89]  Kushang V Patel,et al.  Predicting late-life disability and death by the rate of decline in physical performance measures. , 2012, Age and ageing.

[90]  D. Winter.  Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: Variability and compensating effects , 1984 .

[91]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Principles, techniques, and limitations of near infrared spectroscopy. , 2004, Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee.

[92]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  High and low gamma EEG oscillations in central sensorimotor areas are conversely modulated during the human gait cycle , 2015, NeuroImage.

[93]  T. Platz,et al.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[94]  P. London.  Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[95]  Dario Farina,et al.  Motor modules in robot-aided walking , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[96]  D. Delpy,et al.  Methods of quantitating cerebral near infrared spectroscopy data. , 1988, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[97]  H Hatze,et al.  Motion variability--its definition, quantification, and origin. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[98]  David A. Boas,et al.  A Quantitative Comparison of Simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS Recordings during Functional Brain Activation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[99]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful , 2007, Stroke.

[100]  S. Fantini,et al.  Comment on the modified Beer-Lambert law for scattering media. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[101]  R. C. Macridis.  A review , 1963 .

[102]  R. Calabró,et al.  Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial , 2018, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.