Nonparametric Monte Carlo Simulation for Flood Frequency Curve Derivation: An Application to a Korean Watershed

A mix of causative mechanisms may be responsible for flood at a site. Floods may be caused because of extreme rainfall or rain on other rainfall events. The statistical attributes of these events differ according to the watershed characteristics and the causes. Traditional methods of flood frequency analysis are only adequate for specific situations. Also, to address the uncertainty of flood frequency estimates for hydraulic structures, a series of probabilistic analyses of rainfall-runoff and flow routing models, and their associated inputs, are used. This is a complex problem in that the probability distributions of multiple independent and derived random variables need to be estimated to evaluate the probability of floods. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to develop a flood frequency curve derivation method driven by multiple random variables and to develop a tool that can consider the uncertainties of design floods. This study focuses on developing a flood frequency curve based on nonparametric statistical methods for the estimation of probabilities of rare floods that are more appropriate in Korea. To derive the frequency curve, rainfall generation using the nonparametric kernel density estimation approach is proposed. Many flood events are simulated by nonparametric Monte Carlo simulations coupled with the center Latin hypercube sampling method to estimate the associated uncertainty. This study applies the methods described to a Korean watershed. The results provide higher physical appropriateness and reasonable estimates of design flood.

[1]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[2]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis , 1993 .

[3]  Rolf Weingartner,et al.  Distribution of peak flow derived from a distribution of rainfall volume and runoff coefficient, and a unit hydrograph , 1998 .

[4]  C. Cunnane Unbiased plotting positions — A review , 1978 .

[5]  Juan B. Valdés,et al.  A Physically Based Flood Frequency Distribution , 1984 .

[6]  Mauro Fiorentino,et al.  Derived distribution of floods based on the concept of partial area coverage with a climatic appeal , 2000 .

[7]  J. Hosking L‐Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics , 1990 .

[8]  Upmanu Lall,et al.  Kernel quantite function estimator for flood frequency analysis , 1994 .

[9]  M. Stein Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .

[10]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on Some Nonparametric Estimates of a Density Function , 1956 .

[11]  Upmanu Lall,et al.  A comparison of tail probability estimators for flood frequency analysis , 1993 .

[12]  Ataur Rahman,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation of Flood Frequency Curves from Rainfall , 2002 .

[13]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  A derived flood frequency distribution using Horton Order Ratios , 1982 .

[14]  Dennis McLaughlin,et al.  Estimation of flood frequency: An evaluation of two derived distribution procedures , 1987 .

[15]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Joint Probability Estimates of Return Period Flows , 1988 .

[16]  B. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear, discrete flood event models, 3. Analysis of prediction uncertainty , 1988 .

[17]  A. Loukas Flood frequency estimation by a derived distribution procedure , 2002 .

[18]  Pao Shan Yu,et al.  Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall–runoff model , 2001 .

[19]  A. Owen A Central Limit Theorem for Latin Hypercube Sampling , 1992 .

[20]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[21]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  A derived flood frequency distribution for correlated rainfall intensity and duration. , 2000 .

[22]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response , 1979 .

[23]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[24]  C. S. Melching An improved first-order reliability approach for assessing uncertainties in hydrologic modeling , 1992 .

[25]  Upmanu Lall,et al.  Kernel flood frequency estimators: Bandwidth selection and kernel choice , 1993 .

[26]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[27]  P. S. Eagleson Dynamics of flood frequency , 1972 .

[28]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[29]  Keith Beven,et al.  CHANGING RESPONSES IN HYDROLOGY : ASSESSING THE UNCERTAINTY IN PHYSICALLY BASED MODEL PREDICTIONS , 1991 .

[30]  C. De Michele,et al.  On the derived flood frequency distribution: analytical formulation and the influence of antecedent soil moisture condition , 2002 .