A Spinning Top Model of Formal Organization and Informal Behavior: Dynamics of Advice Networks Among Judges in a Commercial Court

The longitudinal study of advice networks among 240 judges at the Commercial Court of Paris permits the examination of learning as an interactive process. We argue that a spinning top model is a useful heuristic for intra-organizational learning in dynamic advice networks. This model proposes that a stabilized elite preserves accumulated knowledge in a community that overall experiences high turnover and systematic job rotation, and hence runs the danger of inadequately sharing knowledge among its members. We test the model by analyzing the structure and dynamics of advice networks among judges at the Commercial Court of Paris. This dynamic structure reflects the informal homophilous preferences among judges organized in a strong formal system, a high relational turnover in the selection of advisors, and the emergence of an elite of senior advisors that stabilizes the learning process - much like the behavior of a spinning top. This case study also identifies an endogenous process of increasing and then decreasing centralization of this network over time, raising questions about the maintenance of the stability of the pecking order and about the relationship between learning and seniority. Results illustrate the importance of dynamic over static network analysis and call for a renewed attention to formal structure in organizations.

[1]  P. Blau.  The Dynamics Of Bureaucracy , 1955 .

[2]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[3]  P. Holland,et al.  An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs , 1981 .

[4]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[5]  R. Frank.  Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status , 1986 .

[6]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[7]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[8]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[9]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[10]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[11]  Andrew M. Lebby.  The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization, by Peter M. Senge. (1990). New York: Doubleday Currency. 424 pp., $19.95 cloth , 1991 .

[12]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[14]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[15]  E. Lazega.  Micropolitics of Knowledge: Communication and Indirect Control in Workgroups , 1992 .

[16]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. , 1993 .

[17]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[18]  M.A.J. van Duijn.  Estimation of a Random Effects Model for Directed Graphs. , 1995 .

[19]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[20]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  The dynamics and evolution of social networks , 1997 .

[21]  E. Lazega,et al.  Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: A logistic regression model for dyadic network data , 1997 .

[22]  F. Stokman.  Evolution of social networks , 1997 .

[23]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[24]  van der Krogt,et al.  Learning Network Theory: The Tension between Learning Systems and Work Systems in Organizations. , 1998 .

[25]  Rob F. Poell,et al.  The learning-network theory: A new perspective on organising learning systems , 1998 .

[26]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[27]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[28]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Organizational learning: debates past, present and future , 2000 .

[29]  Diane Liang Rulke,et al.  Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance , 2000 .

[30]  Jaime Ortega,et al.  Job Rotation as a Learning Mechanism , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[32]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[33]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[34]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Getting deals done: The use of social networks in bank decision-making , 2001 .

[35]  Arthur L. Stinchcombe,et al.  When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations , 2001 .

[36]  T. Snijders.  The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[37]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[38]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[39]  L. Meignen.  Aux origines de la chambre de commerce de Paris , 2003 .

[40]  C. Lemercier.  Un si discret pouvoir , 2003 .

[41]  Mark Huisman,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal Network Data With Changing Composition , 2003 .

[42]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[43]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Getting by with the Advice of Their Friends: CEOs' Advice Networks and Firms' Strategic Responses to Poor Performance , 2003 .

[44]  M. Crossan,et al.  From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research , 2004 .

[45]  T. Snijders,et al.  p2: a random effects model with covariates for directed graphs , 2004 .

[46]  C. Lemercier,et al.  Un si discret pouvoir : aux origines de la Chambre de commerce de Paris, 1803-1853 , 2004 .

[47]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[48]  Patricia Milne,et al.  A Model for Work-Based Learning , 2005 .

[49]  T. Snijders.  Models for longitudinal network datain , 2005 .

[50]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .