Functional gait asymmetry of unilateral transfemoral amputees.

The aim of prosthetic devices is to mimic the function of biological systems. Numerous investigations have demonstrated significant asymmetries in unilateral amputee gait. The underlying interactions of prosthetic and intact leg are not widely discussed, so far. To get more insight into the functionality of asymmetries, we investigated temporal and kinetic parameters of walking transfemoral amputees wearing the computerized C-Leg and the non-computerized 3R80. Experiments were conducted on an instrumented treadmill at four different walking speeds (0.5, 0.8, 1.1, 1.4m/s) measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces. Single support, double support and contact times, vertical and horizontal impulses as well as their asymmetry factors were calculated. Gait patterns were similar for both prosthetic knee joints, manifesting in (i) reduced stance times of the prosthetic leg, (ii) prolonged load transfer during double support from intact to prosthetic leg at lower speeds, (iii) reduced vertical and horizontal impulses of the prosthetic leg, (iv) net accelerating horizontal impulses during contact of the prosthetic leg, (v) missing impacts at touch-down of the prosthetic leg. Our results suggest that deficits of the prosthetic leg like missing active knee extension and ankle push-off are compensated by the intact leg. The altered touch-down configuration for the prosthetic leg enables it to provide forward propulsion while load bearing is largely shifted to the intact leg.

[1]  Michael S Orendurff,et al.  Gait efficiency using the C-Leg. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Compensatory mechanisms in below-knee amputee gait in response to increasing steady-state walking speeds. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[3]  A. Hof,et al.  Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[4]  Denny J. Padgett,et al.  Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[5]  Reinhard Blickhan,et al.  Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  W D Spence,et al.  A methodology for studying the effects of various types of prosthetic feet on the biomechanics of trans-femoral amputee gait. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J. Michael,et al.  Modern prosthetic knee mechanisms. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Steven A. Gard,et al.  Use of Quantitative Gait Analysis for the Evaluation of Prosthetic Walking Performance , 2006 .

[9]  Chris K. Mechefske,et al.  Initial Biomechanical Analysis and Modeling of Transfemoral Amputee Gait , 2003 .

[10]  H. Cochrane,et al.  Lower limb amputation Part 3: Prosthetics - a 10 year literature review , 2001, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  A. Lees,et al.  Adjustments in gait symmetry with walking speed in trans-femoral and trans-tibial amputees. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[12]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of transfemoral amputee gait using C-Leg and Mauch SNS prosthetic knees. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  W. Polomski,et al.  The energy cost for the step-to-step transition in amputee walking. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[14]  H. Herr,et al.  A Clinical Comparison of Variable-Damping and Mechanically Passive Prosthetic Knee Devices , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[15]  Modern prosthetic knee mechanisms : Amputation and new prosthetic devices , 1999 .

[16]  A. Lees,et al.  The functional demands on the intact limb during walking for active transfemoral and transtibial amputees , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.