Making virtual reconstructions part of the visit: An exploratory study

The paper reports a qualitative study with the objective of obtaining a better understanding of the use of 3D reconstructions as part of a visit to a heritage site. The same content was displayed on two different devices: a tablet that provides an augmented reality (AR) overlapping the reconstructions in the real world and a headset that immerses the visitor in the past via a virtual reality (VR) experience. These two settings were evaluated in two different heritage contexts: a house museum, and a display-case museum. Visitors and museum professionals participated and used both devices. The results show that an AR setting is preferred when it is possible to compare the present day with the past while VR is preferred to contextualise exhibits, particularly when the original environment was monumental. Guidelines to reuse 3D reconstructions as part of the visit are provided on the bases of the questionnaires, observations, and discussions collected during the study.

[1]  Martijn J. Schuemie,et al.  Research on Presence in Virtual Reality: A Survey , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  J. Falk,et al.  Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning , 2000 .

[3]  Steve Poole,et al.  Ghosts in the Garden: locative gameplay and historical interpretation from below# , 2018 .

[4]  Maria Roussou,et al.  Reviving the past: cultural heritage meets virtual reality , 2001, VAST '01.

[5]  Alonzo C. Addison,et al.  Emerging Trends in Virtual Heritage , 2000, IEEE Multim..

[6]  Timothy Jung,et al.  Effects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality on Visitor Experiences in Museum , 2016, ENTER.

[7]  David Moore,et al.  HCI Lessons From PlayStation VR , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[8]  Erik Champion,et al.  Critical Gaming: Interactive History and Virtual Heritage , 2015 .

[9]  Gunnar Liestøl,et al.  Along the Appian Way. Storytelling and Memory across Time and Space in Mobile Augmented Reality , 2014, EuroMed.

[10]  Maria Roussou,et al.  A digital look at physical museum exhibits: Designing personalized stories with handheld Augmented Reality in museums , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[11]  Dunstan Lowe,et al.  Playing with antiquity: Videogame receptions of the classical world , 2009 .

[12]  John H. Falk,et al.  Tourism and identity-related motivations: why am I here (and not there)? , 2013 .

[13]  Areti Damala,et al.  Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit , 2008, DIMEA.

[14]  George Papagiannakis,et al.  A Comparison of Gamified, Immersive VR Curation Methods for Enhanced Presence and Human-computer Interaction in Digital Humanities , 2015 .

[15]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  On the perceptual aesthetics of interactive objects , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Marco Mason,et al.  The MIT Museum Glassware Prototype , 2016, ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage.

[17]  Maria C. R. Harrington.  The Virtual Trillium Trail and the empirical effects of Freedom and Fidelity on discovery-based learning , 2011, Virtual Reality.

[18]  Fumio Kishino,et al.  Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum , 1995, Other Conferences.

[19]  Jonathan Hook,et al.  Viking VR: Designing a Virtual Reality Experience for a Museum , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[20]  Laia Pujol,et al.  Archaeology, museums and virtual reality , 2004 .

[21]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Interactions around a contextually embedded system , 2010, TEI '10.

[22]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Audio-based narratives for the trenches of World War I: Intertwining stories, places and interaction for an evocative experience , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..