Comparison of Data-driven Link Estimation Methods in Low-power Wireless Networks

Link estimation is a basic element of routing in low-power wireless networks, and data-driven link estimation using unicast MAC feedback has been shown to outperform broadcast-beacon-based link estimation. Nonetheless, little is known about how different data-driven link estimation methods affect routing behaviors. To address this issue, we classify existing data-driven link estimation methods into two broad categories: L-NT that uses aggregate information about unicast and L-ETX that uses information about the individual unicast-physical-transmissions. Through mathematical analysis and experimental measurement in a testbed of 98 XSM motes (an enhanced version of MICA2 motes), we examine the accuracy and stability of L-NT and L-ETX in estimating the ETX routing metric. We also experimentally study the routing performance of L-NT and L-ETX. We discover that these two representative, seemingly similar methods of data-driven link estimation differ significantly in routing behaviors: L-ETX is much more accurate and stable than L-NT in estimating the ETX metric, and accordingly, L-ETX achieves a higher data delivery reliability and energy efficiency than L-NT (for instance, by 25.18 percent and a factor of 3.75, respectively, in our testbed). These findings provide new insight into the subtle design issues in data-driven link estimation that significantly impact the reliability, stability, and efficiency of wireless routing, thus shedding light on how to design link estimation methods for mission-critical wireless networks which pose stringent requirements on reliability and predictability.

[1]  Hongwei Zhang.  Experimental Analysis of Link Estimation Methods in Low Power Wireless Networks , 2011 .

[2]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[3]  David E. Culler,et al.  Design of a wireless sensor network platform for detecting rare, random, and ephemeral events , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[4]  Songwu Lu,et al.  GRAdient Broadcast: A Robust Data Delivery Protocol for Large Scale Sensor Networks , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[5]  David E. Culler,et al.  Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[6]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[7]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Routing algorithms for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications in underwater sensor networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[8]  J. Heidemann,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Concurrent Packet Transmissions in Low-Power Wireless Networks , 2005 .

[9]  S. Liew,et al.  Throughput Analysis of IEEE 802 . 11 Multi-hop Ad hoc Networks , 2007 .

[10]  Tzi-cker Chiueh,et al.  Design of a Channel Characteristics-Aware Routing Protocol , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[11]  Sneha Kumar Kasera,et al.  Expected data rate: an accurate high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing , 2005, 2005 Second Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2005. IEEE SECON 2005..

[12]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  On accurate measurement of link quality in multi-hop wireless mesh networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[13]  Chenyang Lu,et al.  SPEED: a stateless protocol for real-time communication in sensor networks , 2003, 23rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[14]  Soung Chang Liew,et al.  Throughput analysis of IEEE802.11 multi-hop ad hoc networks , 2007, TNET.

[15]  Elif Uysal-Biyikoglu,et al.  From Experience with Indoor Wireless Networks: A Link Quality Metric that Captures Channel Memory , 2007, IEEE Communications Letters.

[16]  David E. Culler,et al.  Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks , 2004, SenSys '04.

[17]  Hongqiang Zhai,et al.  Impact of Routing Metrics on Path Capacity in Multirate and Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.

[18]  Seungjoon Lee,et al.  Efficient geographic routing in multihop wireless networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[19]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Capacity of Ad Hoc wireless networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[20]  Philip Levis,et al.  The β-factor: measuring wireless link burstiness , 2008, SenSys '08.

[21]  Philip Levis,et al.  Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks , 2006, SenSys '06.

[22]  Philip Levis,et al.  Collection tree protocol , 2009, SenSys '09.

[23]  Robert Morris,et al.  Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network , 2004, SIGCOMM 2004.

[24]  Marco Zuniga,et al.  An analysis of unreliability and asymmetry in low-power wireless links , 2007, TOSN.

[25]  Yin Zhang,et al.  A general model of wireless interference , 2007, MobiCom '07.

[26]  Brian D. Noble,et al.  Mobile network estimation , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[27]  Sachin Katti,et al.  Trading structure for randomness in wireless opportunistic routing , 2007, SIGCOMM 2007.

[28]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  a high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[29]  Andreas Willig,et al.  A new class of packet- and bit-level models for wireless channels , 2002, The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[30]  Philip Levis,et al.  Four-Bit Wireless Link Estimation , 2007, HotNets.

[31]  Prasun Sinha,et al.  Learn on the Fly: Data-Driven Link Estimation and Routing in Sensor Network Backbones , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[32]  Christian F. Tschudin,et al.  Coping with communication gray zones in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks , 2002, WOWMOM '02.

[33]  I.D. Chakeres,et al.  The utility of hello messages for determining link connectivity , 2002, The 5th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications.

[34]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Visibility: a new metric for protocol design , 2007, SenSys '07.

[35]  Calvin Newport,et al.  The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research , 2003 .

[36]  Sang Hyuk Son,et al.  Robust and timely communication over highly dynamic sensor networks , 2007, Real-Time Systems.

[37]  Sang Hyuk Son,et al.  Efficiency Centric Communication Model for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[38]  Emre Ertin,et al.  Kansei: a testbed for sensing at scale , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[39]  Jitendra Padhye,et al.  Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks , 2004, SIGCOMM 2004.

[40]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Quality-Aware Routing Metrics for Time-Varying Wireless Mesh Networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[41]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[42]  Prasun Sinha,et al.  Link Estimation and Routing in Sensor Network Backbones: Beacon-Based or Data-Driven? , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[43]  Hongwei Zhang,et al.  Comparison of Data-driven Link Estimation Methods in Low-power Wireless Networks , 2009, SECON.

[44]  Tian He,et al.  Data forwarding in extremely low duty-cycle sensor networks with unreliable communication links , 2007, SenSys '07.

[45]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  ExOR: opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.