“Why Did You Blend My Learning?” A Comparison of Student Success in Lecture and Blended Learning Introduction to Sociology Courses

Introduction to Sociology at a large public university was taught in two separate formats, blended learning and lecture, during the same semester by the first author. While some similarities existed, the distinction was in delivery of course content. Additionally, the blended class had one-third less in-class time that was primarily devoted to active learning. In this quasi-experimental study, the researchers tested differences in learning using grades and pre-posttests. Although there were no statistically significant differences across sections in exams and final grades, the blended class had significantly greater improvement on the overall pre- to posttest. Additionally, students of color and non–first year students in that class had significantly greater improvement on the pre-posttest compared to those subpopulations in the lecture course. The authors conclude that blended learning, employing flipped pedagogy and centered on active learning, may be more effective than lecture, particularly in narrowing the achievement gap between white and non-white students.

[1]  Alison E. M. Adams,et al.  A Tale of Two Sections: An Experiment to Compare the Effectiveness of a Hybrid versus a Traditional Lecture Format in Introductory Microbiology , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[2]  Bert Hoogewijs,et al.  Our Underachieving Colleges , 2005 .

[3]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Cultural Ways of Learning: Individual Traits or Repertoires of Practice , 2003 .

[4]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Feeling close and doing well: the prevalence and motivational effects of interpersonally engaging emotions in Mexican and European American cultural contexts. , 2013, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[5]  Robert A. Wisher,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF WEB-BASED AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: , 2006 .

[6]  Zachary Schrank,et al.  An Assessment of Student Perceptions and Responses to Frequent Low-stakes Testing in Introductory Sociology Classes , 2016 .

[7]  Ryan Ceresola,et al.  The Effect of Peer Review on Student Learning Outcomes in a Research Methods Course , 2015 .

[8]  Andrea N. Hunt,et al.  Can Online Courses Deliver In-class Results? , 2012 .

[9]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Engineering Cultures: Online versus In-class , 2008 .

[10]  Namsook Jahng,et al.  Student Achievement in Online Distance Education Compared to Face-to-Face Education , 2007 .

[11]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Increasing the diversity of engineering education – a gender analysis in a PBL context , 2009 .

[12]  Davison M. Mupinga,et al.  Students' Positive and Negative Experiences in Hybrid and Online Classes , 2007 .

[13]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Priciples and Guidlines , 2007 .

[14]  Barbara Waha,et al.  University students’ perspective on blended learning , 2014 .

[15]  Beth Chance,et al.  Assessment in Statistics Education: Issues and Challenges , 2000 .

[16]  Katherine B. Novak,et al.  Another Nibble at the Core , 2014 .

[17]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Is It Live or Is It Internet? Experimental Estimates of the Effects of Online Instruction on Student Learning , 2010, Journal of Labor Economics.

[18]  Sarah L. Eddy,et al.  Getting Under the Hood: How and for Whom Does Increasing Course Structure Work? , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[19]  Jeffrey Chin,et al.  Faculty Assessment and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Knowledge Available/Knowledge Needed. , 2003 .

[20]  G. L. Weiss The Current Status of Assessment in Sociology Departments. , 2002 .

[21]  Mona Hicks,et al.  Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More , 2006 .

[22]  P. Baker Does the Sociology of Teaching Inform "Teaching Sociology?". , 1985 .

[23]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  A Model of How Different Biology Experts Explain Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Funda Dag,et al.  A Blended Learning Experience , 2012 .

[25]  Theodore J. Joyce,et al.  Does classroom time matter , 2015 .

[26]  Jeffrey Chin Is there a scholarship of teaching and learning in Teaching Sociology a look at papers from 1984 to 1999 , 2002 .

[27]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Michael Delucchi,et al.  Measuring Student Learning in Social Statistics , 2014 .

[29]  C. Auster Blended Learning as a Potentially Winning Combination of Face-to-face and Online Learning , 2016 .

[30]  Theodore C. Wagenaar Outcomes Assessment in Sociology: Prevalence and Impact. , 2002 .

[31]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Active Learning Techniques Versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science , 1999 .

[32]  C. Thompson How the College works , 1996 .

[33]  Heejung S. Kim,et al.  We talk, therefore we think? A cultural analysis of the effect of talking on thinking. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap , 2006 .

[35]  Beth A. Morton,et al.  Effects of Web-Based Instruction on Math Anxiety, the Sense of Mastery, and Global Self-Esteem: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Undergraduate Statistics Students , 2006 .

[36]  J. Yoder,et al.  Journal Abstracts , 2002 .

[37]  Matthew M. Chingos,et al.  Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six-Campus Randomized Trial. , 2014 .

[38]  J. D. Walker,et al.  It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms , 2014, Comput. Educ..