Altered Balance of Receptive Field Excitation and Suppression in Visual Cortex of Amblyopic Macaque Monkeys

In amblyopia, a visual disorder caused by abnormal visual experience during development, the amblyopic eye (AE) loses visual sensitivity whereas the fellow eye (FE) is largely unaffected. Binocular vision in amblyopes is often disrupted by interocular suppression. We used 96-electrode arrays to record neurons and neuronal groups in areas V1 and V2 of six female macaque monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) made amblyopic by artificial strabismus or anisometropia in early life, as well as two visually normal female controls. To measure suppressive binocular interactions directly, we recorded neuronal responses to dichoptic stimulation. We stimulated both eyes simultaneously with large sinusoidal gratings, controlling their contrast independently with raised-cosine modulators of different orientations and spatial frequencies. We modeled each eye's receptive field at each cortical site using a difference of Gaussian envelopes and derived estimates of the strength of central excitation and surround suppression. We used these estimates to calculate ocular dominance separately for excitation and suppression. Excitatory drive from the FE dominated amblyopic visual cortex, especially in more severe amblyopes, but suppression from both the FE and AEs was prevalent in all animals. This imbalance created strong interocular suppression in deep amblyopes: increasing contrast in the AE decreased responses at binocular cortical sites. These response patterns reveal mechanisms that likely contribute to the interocular suppression that disrupts vision in amblyopes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Amblyopia is a developmental visual disorder that alters both monocular vision and binocular interaction. Using microelectrode arrays, we examined binocular interaction in primary visual cortex and V2 of six amblyopic macaque monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) and two visually normal controls. By stimulating the eyes dichoptically, we showed that, in amblyopic cortex, the binocular combination of signals is altered. The excitatory influence of the two eyes is imbalanced to a degree that can be predicted from the severity of amblyopia, whereas suppression from both eyes is prevalent in all animals. This altered balance of excitation and suppression reflects mechanisms that may contribute to the interocular perceptual suppression that disrupts vision in amblyopes.

[1]  J. Movshon,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and vernier acuity in amblyopic monkeys , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  Alessandra Angelucci,et al.  Different Orientation Tuning of Near- and Far-Surround Suppression in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex Mirrors Their Tuning in Human Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Robert F Hess,et al.  The role of suppression in amblyopia. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Movshon,et al.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Shapley,et al.  Visual spatial characterization of macaque V1 neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  H. Burian,et al.  Binocular vision and ocular motility , 1975 .

[8]  Michael J Hawken,et al.  Functional Characterization of the Extraclassical Receptive Field in Macaque V1: Contrast, Orientation, and Temporal Dynamics , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Hocking,et al.  An adult-like pattern of ocular dominance columns in striate cortex of newborn monkeys prior to visual experience , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  A push-pull treatment for strengthening the ‘lazy eye’ in amblyopia , 2013, Current Biology.

[11]  R. Sireteanu,et al.  Naso-temporal asymmetries in human amblyopia: Consequence of long-term interocular suppression , 1981, Vision Research.

[12]  G N Dutton,et al.  Assessment of a computer-based treatment for older amblyopes: the Glasgow Pilot Study , 2009, Eye.

[13]  D. Levi Linking assumptions in amblyopia , 2013, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Amblyopia in the Visual Cortex of Macaque Monkeys with Experimental Strabismus and Anisometropia , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Binocular interaction in the peripheral visual field of humans with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia , 1981, Vision Research.

[16]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Relationship between intrinsic connections and functional architecture revealed by optical imaging and in vivo targeted biocytin injections in primate striate cortex. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  The spatial extent over which neurons in macaque striate cortex pool visual signals , 2002, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  R F Hess,et al.  A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. , 2010, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[19]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast Gain Control in the Visual Cortex: Monocular Versus Binocular Mechanisms , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  P. J. Knox,et al.  An exploratory study: prolonged periods of binocular stimulation can provide an effective treatment for childhood amblyopia. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  David G. Jones,et al.  Experience-dependent changes in NMDAR1 expression in the visual cortex of an animal model for amblyopia , 2004, Visual Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Bear,et al.  Glutamic acid decarboxylase in the striate cortex of normal and monocularly deprived kittens , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  D. L. Adams,et al.  Perception via the Deviated Eye in Strabismus , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Relation between patterns of intrinsic lateral connectivity, ocular dominance, and cytochrome oxidase-reactive regions in macaque monkey striate cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  C. Schor,et al.  Visual Stimuli for Strabismic Suppression , 1977, Perception.

[28]  David G. Jones,et al.  Experience-dependent central vision deficits: Neurobiology and visual acuity , 2015, Vision Research.

[29]  A. Norcia,et al.  Changes in cortical activity during suppression in stereoblindness , 2000, Neuroreport.

[30]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Strabismus Disrupts Binocular Synaptic Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Vasily Vorobyov,et al.  Strabismic suppression is mediated by inhibitory interactions in the primary visual cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Consequences of amblyopia on education, occupation, and long term vision loss , 2004, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[33]  D. Hubel,et al.  Plasticity of ocular dominance columns in monkey striate cortex. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  M P Stryker,et al.  Rapid remodeling of axonal arbors in the visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[35]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Effects of the duration of early strabismus on the binocular responses of neurons in the monkey visual cortex (V1). , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Interocular control of neuronal responsiveness in cat visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[37]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  J. Movshon,et al.  Effects of early unilateral blur on the macaque's visual system. II. Anatomical observations , 1987 .

[39]  Alan W. Freeman,et al.  Components of visual acuity loss in strabismus , 1996, Vision Research.

[40]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Surround suppression of V1 neurons mediates orientation-based representation of high-order visual features. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Jenna G. Kelly,et al.  Asymmetric Dichoptic Masking in Visual Cortex of Amblyopic Macaque Monkeys , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Jenna G. Kelly,et al.  Population representation of visual information in areas V1 and V2 of amblyopic macaques , 2015, Vision Research.

[43]  Alex S. Ferecskó,et al.  One axon-multiple functions: Specificity of lateral inhibitory connections by large basket cells , 2002, Journal of neurocytology.

[44]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Strabismic suppression depends on the amount of dissimilarity between left- and right-eye images , 2002, Vision Research.

[45]  R. Cumming,et al.  Prevalence and causes of amblyopia in an adult population. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[46]  Y. Chino,et al.  Effect of onset age of strabismus on the binocular responses of neurons in the monkey visual cortex. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[47]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Dichoptic training enables the adult amblyopic brain to learn , 2013, Current Biology.

[49]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Anatomical origins of the classical receptive field and modulatory surround field of single neurons in macaque visual cortical area V1. , 2002, Progress in brain research.

[50]  P. Lennie,et al.  Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones , 1979, Nature.

[51]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Neuronal responses in visual area V2 (V2) of macaque monkeys with strabismic amblyopia. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  R. Hess,et al.  Quantitative measurement of interocular suppression in anisometropic amblyopia: a case-control study. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[53]  R S Harwerth,et al.  Residual binocular interactions in the striate cortex of monkeys reared with abnormal binocular vision. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Visual loss during interocular suppression in normal and strabismic subjects , 1994, Vision Research.

[55]  L. E. Hallum,et al.  Surround suppression supports second-order feature encoding by macaque V1 and V2 neurons , 2014, Vision Research.

[56]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Keeping an eye on the brain: the role of visual experience in monkeys and children. , 1993, The Journal of general psychology.

[57]  P. Lennie,et al.  Contrast adaptation in striate cortex of macaque , 1989, Vision Research.

[58]  Lynne Kiorpes,et al.  Factors limiting contrast sensitivity in experimentally amblyopic macaque monkeys , 1999, Vision Research.

[59]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  E. G. Jones,et al.  Reduction in number of immunostained GABAergic neurones in deprived-eye dominance columns of monkey area 17 , 1986, Nature.

[61]  M P Stryker,et al.  Rapid Anatomical Plasticity of Horizontal Connections in the Developing Visual Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  U. Eysel,et al.  Orientation-specific relationship between populations of excitatory and inhibitory lateral connections in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.