Journal of Pre-college Engineering Education Research (j-peer) Student Learning in Challenge-based Engineering Curricula Recommended Citation Student Learning in Challenge-based Engineering Curricula Student Learning in Challenge-based Engineering Curricula

In recent years, there has been a demand to teach engineering in high schools, particularly using a challenge-based curriculum. Many of these programs have the dual goals of teaching students the engineering design process (EDP), and teaching to deepen their understanding and ability to apply science and math concepts. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, this study examines whether a high school design engineering program accomplishes each of the two goals. During the 2010–2011 school year, over 100 students enrolled in the same design engineering course in seven high schools. Evidence of learning and application of the EDP is accomplished by triangulating student interviews with pre-/post-tests of EDP-related questions and a survey of design engineering beliefs. To determine whether students could apply science and math concepts, we examined content test questions to see if students used science and math ideas to justify their engineering work, and triangulated these results with student interviews. The results are mixed, implying that although there is some learning, application is inconsistent.

[1]  M. David Burghardt,et al.  Informed Design: A Contemporary Approach to Design Pedagogy as the Core Process in Technology: In Classroom Settings Most Problems Are Usually Well Defined, So Students Have Little Experience with Open-Ended Problems , 2004 .

[2]  Derrick Tate,et al.  Matching pedagogical intent with engineering design process models for precollege education , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[3]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Teaching Children Science: A Project-Based Approach , 1998 .

[4]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[5]  R. Marx,et al.  Design‐based science and student learning , 2004 .

[6]  Robert A. Linsenmeier,et al.  The VaNTH Bioengineering Curriculum Project , 2002, Proceedings of the Second Joint 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society] [Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[7]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[8]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Conceptions of the Engineering Design Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals , 2005 .

[9]  Garrett M. Clayton,et al.  The promise of impromptu design exercises as a pedagogical tool in engineering design education , 2011 .

[10]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges , 2000 .

[11]  Victor R. Lee,et al.  Framing in cognitive clinical interviews about intuitive science knowledge: Dynamic student understandings of the discourse interaction , 2012 .

[12]  David S. Cordray,et al.  A Research Synthesis of the Effectiveness, Replicability, and Generality of the VaNTH Challenge‐based Instructional Modules in Bioengineering , 2009 .

[13]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Engineering Design and Communication: The Case for Interdisciplinary Collaboration* , 2001 .

[14]  Taylor Martin,et al.  Comparison of Student Learning in Challenge-based and Traditional Instruction in Biomedical Engineering , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Learning by Design from Theory to Practice , 1998 .

[16]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[17]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  Engineering is Elementary: Children's Changing Understandings of Science and Engineering , 2007 .