Comparison of Hamstring Tendon and Patellar Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: The choice of graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial, and despite numerous studies, there is still an ongoing debate on this topic. The 2 most widely used grafts are the hamstring tendon and patellar tendon. Hypothesis: In this study, we hypothesized that the revision rate after primary ACLR is greater when using hamstring tendon grafts compared with patellar tendon grafts. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: From the nationwide population-based Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry, we identified all primary ACLR procedures (n = 13,647) performed in Denmark between July 2005 and December 2011. The end point was revision ACLR. As other end points, we used objective measurements and patient-reported outcome scores. Revision rates and relative risk estimates for revision ACLR were calculated using Cox multiple regression. Results: The use of hamstring tendon grafts increased from 68% in 2005 to 85% in 2011. The cumulative revision rates for hamstring tendon grafts at 1 and 5 years were 0.65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51%-0.82%) and 4.45% (95% CI, 3.94%-5.01%), respectively. For patellar tendon grafts, the revision rate was 0.16% (95% CI, 0.05%-0.50%) at 1 year and 3.03% (95% CI, 2.27%-4.05%) at 5 years. The adjusted overall relative risk of revision surgery in the hamstring tendon group compared with the patellar tendon group was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.03-1.92), and the adjusted relative risk of undergoing revision surgery performed after 1 and 5 years was 3.82 (95% CI, 1.20-12.2) and 1.90 (95% CI, 0.43-8.40), respectively. Conclusion: In this population-based study, the use of hamstring tendon grafts in ACLR was associated with an increased risk of revision compared with patellar tendon grafts, in particular during the first year after surgery. These results demonstrate that both hamstring and patellar tendon grafts reveal good results after ACLR and suggest that graft selection should be based on an individual evaluation of patient demands and graft morbidity.

[1]  T. Thillemann,et al.  Validation of 14,500 operated knees registered in the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register: registration completeness and validity of key variables , 2013, Clinical epidemiology.

[2]  T. Strand,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[3]  M. Lind,et al.  Incidence and Outcome After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  Jingmin Zhao,et al.  A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing hamstring autografts versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  Dean C Taylor,et al.  Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  S. Kopf,et al.  A new quantitative method for pivot shift grading , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  Olufemi R. Ayeni,et al.  Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  K. Dainty,et al.  Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  G. Barrett,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[10]  C. Pedersen,et al.  The Danish Civil Registration System , 2011, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[11]  K. Spindler,et al.  Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction? , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  K. Eriksson,et al.  Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Graft or Quadrupled Semitendinosus Graft , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  E. Alentorn-Geli,et al.  The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2010, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  Jonas Ranstam,et al.  A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  E. Roos,et al.  Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  L. Engebretsen,et al.  The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004–2007: baseline epidemiology , 2009, Acta orthopaedica.

[17]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  Cross-cultural comparison of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in the United States and Norway , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  D. Biau,et al.  Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Reconstructing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Rodney X. Sturdivant,et al.  Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  M. Lind,et al.  The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  J. Bencke,et al.  The Effects of Neuromuscular Training on Knee Joint Motor Control During Sidecutting in Female Elite Soccer and Handball Players , 2008, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[22]  J. Kartus,et al.  Patellar Tendon or Semitendinosus Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  R. Burchette,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  Leo A. Pinczewski,et al.  A 7-Year Follow-up of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Grafts for Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  R. Buzzi,et al.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  R. Buzzi,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Compared with Double Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Grafts , 2004 .

[27]  H. Jonsson,et al.  Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[28]  K. Webster,et al.  A Randomized Comparison of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction * , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[30]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-Year follow-up. , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[31]  B. Bach,et al.  Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Metaanalysis Comparing Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Autografts , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[32]  S. Woo,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Study of the Healing of an Intraarticular Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft in a Goat Model * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[33]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[34]  W. Grana,et al.  Analysis of a Semitendinosus Autograft in a Rabbit Model , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[35]  H T Sorensen,et al.  A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[36]  W. Grana,et al.  An Analysis of Autograft Fixation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Rabbit Model , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[37]  D. Kohn,et al.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament , 1990, The American journal of sports medicine.

[38]  N. Caplan,et al.  Rating Systems in the Evaluation of Knee Ligament Injuries , 2014 .

[39]  T. Thillemann,et al.  Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. , 2013, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[40]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Causal Diagrams , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[41]  M. Heidvall,et al.  A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.