Generation X: Anthropology in a Media-Saturated World

My problem for the present article concerns the relationship between "public culture" on the one hand, and ethnographic inquiry on the other, in the contemporary United States. By "public culture" I mean all the bodies of images, claims, and representations created to speak to and about the actual people who live in the United States: all of the products of art and entertainment (film, television, books, and so on), as well as all of the texts of information and analysis (all forms of journalism and academic production). "Public culture" includes all the products of what is commonly called the "media," but much more as well. Public culture in this sense stands in a very complex relationship to "ethnography." First, public culture is both subject and object vis-a-vis the ethnographer. It claims, and the ethnographer must grant, that it stands as a competing subject, a competing author(ity): many journalists, as well as academics in many other fields, are jostling with ethnographers to tell "the truth" about U.S. culture. As we shall see when we turn to the public representations concerning Generation X, journalists and academics are constantly trying to subsume one another, to claim the position of subject and to turn one another into objects, data. Journalists quote both native informants and academic experts to weave a story about the here and now; academics do the same with journalists, as I will do in this article. Ethnographers' "data" are part of the journalists' stories; journalists' reporting is part of the public culture and thus part of the ethnographic data. In trying to think through this relationship, several temptations need to be avoided. The first is the unmodified "cultural studies" or "media studies" temptation-the fantasy that one can understand the workings of public cultural

[1]  R. G. Fox.  Culture—A Second Chance? , 1999, Current Anthropology.

[2]  A. Escobar.  After Nature , 1999, Current Anthropology.

[3]  Sherry B. Ortner.  Identities: The Hidden Life of Class , 1998, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[4]  C. Strauss.  Partly Fragmented, Partly Integrated: An Anthropological Examination of “Postmodern Fragmented Subjects” , 1997 .

[5]  N. Z. Davis.  Religion and Capitalism Once Again? Jewish Merchant Culture in the Seventeenth Century , 1997 .

[6]  Sherry B. Ortner.  Fieldwork in the Postcommunity , 1997 .

[7]  J. Comaroff,et al.  Of Revelation and Revolution, Volume 2: The Dialectics of Modernity on a South African Frontier , 1997 .

[8]  T. McDonald.  The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences , 1996 .

[9]  G. Holtz.  Welcome to the Jungle: The Why Behind "Generation X" , 1995 .

[10]  R. Rouse,et al.  Thinking through Transnationalism: Notes on the Cultural Politics of Class Relations in the Contemporary United States , 1995 .

[11]  R. Nelson,et al.  Revolution X: A Survival Guide for Our Generation , 1994 .

[12]  P. Lyons.  Class of '66: Living in Suburban Middle America , 1994 .

[13]  J. Kelly,et al.  rethinking resistance: dialogics of “disaffection” in colonial Fiji , 1994 .

[14]  F. Coronil.  Listening to the Subaltern: The Poetics of Neocolonial States , 1994 .

[15]  N. Howe,et al.  13th Gen: Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail? , 1993 .

[16]  K. Newman.  Declining Fortunes: The Withering Of The American Dream , 1993 .

[17]  P. D. Hall,et al.  Lives In Trust: The Fortunes Of Dynastic Families In Late Twentieth-century America , 1993 .

[18]  W. Dunn.  Hanging out with American youth. , 1992 .

[19]  Akhil Gupta,et al.  Beyond “Culture”: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference , 1992 .

[20]  W. Sewell.  A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Donna Gaines.  Teenage Wasteland: Suburbia's Dead End Kids , 1991 .

[22]  Douglas Coupland,et al.  Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture , 1991 .

[23]  B. Orlove.  Mapping reeds and reading maps: the politics of representation in Lake Titicaca , 1991 .

[24]  Stuart Hall,et al.  Resistance Through Rituals : Youth Subcultures in Post-War Britain , 1991 .

[25]  L. White,et al.  Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America , 1990 .

[26]  S. Barzilai.  Reading "Snow White": The Mother's Story , 1990, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[27]  George Lipsitz,et al.  Time Passages: Collective Memory and American Popular Culture , 1990 .

[28]  Martha Kaplan.  meaning, agency and colonial history: Navosavakadua and the Tuka movement in Fiji , 1990 .

[29]  Lila Abu-Lughod,et al.  the romance of resistance: tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women , 1990 .

[30]  K. Sacks.  Toward a unified theory of class, race, and gender , 1989 .

[31]  Margaret R. Somers,et al.  Workers of the World, Compare!@@@Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Western Europe and the United States. , 1989 .

[32]  Nancy Sullivan.  Questions About Mixed Media , 1989 .

[33]  A. Stoler.  Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule , 1989, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[34]  Michael Moffatt,et al.  Coming of Age in New Jersey: College and American Culture , 1989 .

[35]  M. Mcguire,et al.  Ritual healing in suburban America , 1989 .

[36]  James Clifford,et al.  The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. , 1989 .

[37]  Andrew J. Pierre,et al.  A High technology gap? : Europe, America and Japan , 1988 .

[38]  S. Hall.  The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the Theorists''in , 1988 .

[39]  John Urry,et al.  The End of Organized Capitalism , 1989 .

[40]  F. Errington.  reflexivity deflected: the festival of nations as an American cultural performance , 1987 .

[41]  W. Hanks.  authenticity and ambivalence in the text: a colonial Maya case , 1986 .

[42]  M. Milivojević.  The Dream is Alive , 1986 .

[43]  C. Smith-Rosenberg.  Writing History: Language, Class, and Gender , 1986 .

[44]  C. White.  Everyday resistance, socialist revolution and rural development: The Vietnamese case , 1986 .

[45]  A. Stoler.  Plantation politics and protest on Sumatra's east coast , 1986 .

[46]  B. Fegan.  Tenants’ non‐violent resistance to landowner claims in a central Luzon , 1986 .

[47]  Teresa de Lauretis,et al.  Feminist studies, critical studies , 1986 .

[48]  James C. Scott.  Everyday forms of peasant resistance , 1986 .

[49]  J. Rieder,et al.  Where have all the Liberals Gone?@@@Canarsie: The Jews and Italians of Brooklyn against Liberalism. , 1986 .

[50]  Homi K. Bhabha.  Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence and Authority under a Tree outside Delhi, May 1817 , 1985, Critical Inquiry.

[51]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  Are American rates of social mobility exceptionally high? New evidence on an old issue , 1985 .

[52]  Charles Taylor.  Human Agency and Language: The concept of a person , 1985 .

[53]  Charles Taylor,et al.  Human Agency and Language: What is human agency? , 1985 .

[54]  Sherry B. Ortner.  Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties , 1984, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[55]  R. T. Smith.  Anthropology and the Concept of Social Class , 1984 .

[56]  David Halle.  America's working man : work, home, and politics among blue-collar property owners , 1984 .

[57]  Marshall Sahlins,et al.  Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities , 2020, The New Social Theory Reader.

[58]  B. Cohn.  History and Anthropology: The State of Play , 1980, Comparative Studies in Society and History.

[59]  David M. Schneider,et al.  American Kinship: A Cultural Account , 1980 .

[60]  P. Walker.  Between Labour And Capital , 1979 .

[61]  P. Willis.  Learning to Labor: How Working-Class Kids Get Working-Class Jobs , 1976 .

[62]  Sherry B. Ortner.  On Key Symbols1 , 1973 .

[63]  S. Lipset,et al.  Social Mobility in Industrial Society. , 1959 .

[64]  W. Goldschmidt.  Social Class and the Dynamics of Status in America , 1955 .

[65]  D. Riesman,et al.  Automobile Workers and the American Dream , 1955 .

[66]  W. Goldschmidt.  Social Class in America—A Critical Review , 1950 .