The effect of cost surface parameterization on landscape resistance estimates

A cost or resistance surface is a representation of a landscape’s permeability to animal movement or gene flow and is a tool for measuring functional connectivity in landscape ecology and genetics studies. Parameterizing cost surfaces by assigning weights to different landscape elements has been challenging however, because true costs are rarely known; thus, expert opinion is often used to derive relative weights. Assigning weights would be made easier if the sensitivity of different landscape resistance estimates to relative costs was known. We carried out a sensitivity analysis of three methods to parameterize a cost surface and two models of landscape permeability: least cost path and effective resistance. We found two qualitatively different responses to varying cost weights: linear and asymptotic changes. The most sensitive models (i.e. those leading to linear change) were accumulated least cost and effective resistance estimates on a surface coded as resistance (i.e. where high‐quality elements were held constant at a low‐value, and low‐quality elements were varied at higher values). All other cost surface scenarios led to asymptotic change. Developing a cost surface that produces a linear response of landscape resistance estimates to cost weight variation will improve the accuracy of functional connectivity estimates, especially when cost weights are selected through statistical model fitting procedures. On the other hand, for studies where cost weights are unknown and model selection is not being used, methods where resistance estimates vary asymptotically with cost weights may be more appropriate, because of their relative insensitivity to parameterization.

[1]  D. H. Reed,et al.  Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations , 2006 .

[2]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics , 2003 .

[3]  W. D. Cairns,et al.  THE MATHEMATICAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA. , 1918, Science.

[4]  J. Row,et al.  Habitat distribution influences dispersal and fine‐scale genetic population structure of eastern foxsnakes (Mintonius gloydi) across a fragmented landscape , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[5]  Helene H. Wagner,et al.  Landscape Genetics , 2008 .

[6]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) , 2007 .

[7]  Peter G. Doyle,et al.  Random Walks and Electric Networks: REFERENCES , 1987 .

[8]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[9]  Pierre Joly,et al.  Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[10]  Jeff Bowman,et al.  Using a genetic network to parameterize a landscape resistance surface for fishers, Martes pennanti , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[11]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[12]  K. Selkoe,et al.  Ocean currents help explain population genetic structure , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  J. Hemmer-Hansen,et al.  Landscape genetics goes to sea , 2007, Journal of biology.

[14]  Sarah E. Gergel,et al.  Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis—a tool for invasive species management , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  Andrew Fall,et al.  The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[16]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. A reply , 2001 .

[17]  Erin L. Koen,et al.  The Effect of Map Boundary on Estimates of Landscape Resistance to Animal Movement , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  Paul Beier,et al.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[20]  Paul Beier,et al.  Forks in the Road: Choices in Procedures for Designing Wildland Linkages , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[21]  Signe Normand,et al.  Landscape genetics, historical isolation and cross‐Andean gene flow in the wax palm, Ceroxylon echinulatum (Arecaceae) , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[22]  P. Beier,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of least-cost modeling for designing wildlife linkages. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: An application of graph theory , 2006 .

[24]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[25]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single‐species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations , 1991 .

[26]  Landscape resistance and American marten gene flow , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  Nicolas Ray,et al.  pathmatrix: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples , 2005 .

[28]  A. Davidson,et al.  Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[29]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus) , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[30]  Prabhakar Raghavan,et al.  The electrical resistance of a graph captures its commute and cover times , 2005, computational complexity.

[31]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics , 2007 .

[32]  Nicolas Ray,et al.  Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana) , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  B. Mcrae,et al.  ISOLATION BY RESISTANCE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[35]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology , 2001 .

[36]  D. Olson,et al.  Seascape Genetics: A Coupled Oceanographic-Genetic Model Predicts Population Structure of Caribbean Corals , 2006, Current Biology.

[37]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Brett J. Goodwin,et al.  Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[39]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[40]  M. Fortin,et al.  Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[41]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors , 2009 .