Judging the Best Interests of the Child: Judges' Accounts of the Tender Years Doctrine

With dramatic changes in family life over the last several decades, child custody law has shifted from a maternal preference to a more egalitarian standard, the best interests of the child. Despite this change in the law, scholars have debated whether gender continues to play a role in the resolution of custody disputes. Drawing on feminist legal scholarship and sociolegal research on judges, I assess the current debates over gender and custody by examining the accounts of judges who frequently adjudicate custody cases. I conduct in-depth, face-to-face interviews with twenty-five trial court judges in Indiana and investigate judges' accounts about whether they continue to use the tender years doctrine in custody disputes, even though the custody statute is explicitly gender-neutral. Then, I assess several competing explanations of the variation across judges' accounts, including the judges' gender role attitudes, gender, age, and political party affiliation. In exploratory analyses, I also examine the contested custody rulings of a subset of nine judges to assess whether judges' accounts are congruent with their actual custody decisions. I discuss the implications of these findings in light of feminist legal scholarship as well as empirical research on child custody adjudication.

[1]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[2]  S. Wallace,et al.  Influence of Child and Family Factors on Judicial Decisions in Contested Custody Cases , 2003 .

[3]  L. Stamps.  Maternal Preference in Child Custody Decisions , 2002 .

[4]  Lynn M. Mather,et al.  Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice , 2001 .

[5]  Barbara Palmer.  Women in the American Judiciary , 2001 .

[6]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[7]  D. Steffensmeier,et al.  Women and Men Policymakers: Does the Judge's Gender Affect the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants? , 1999 .

[8]  S. Kunen,et al.  Judges' Beliefs Dealing with Child Custody Decisions , 1998 .

[9]  Irene Padavic,et al.  PERCEPTIONS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE FLORIDA LEGAL SYSTEM , 1997 .

[10]  L. Sheeber,et al.  Judges' Reliance on Psychological, Sociological, and Legal Variables in Contested Custody Decisions , 1997 .

[11]  T. Orbuch,et al.  People's Accounts Count: The Sociology of Accounts , 1997 .

[12]  Jeffery T. Ulmer.  Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities Under Sentencing Guidelines , 1997 .

[13]  G. Bazemore,et al.  Rehabilitation in the new juvenile court: Do judges support the treatment ethic? , 1997 .

[14]  R. A. Carp,et al.  Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts , 1996 .

[15]  Jeffery T. Ulmer,et al.  COURT COMMUNITIES UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: DILEMMAS OF FORMAL RATIONALITY AND SENTENCING DISPARITY , 1996 .

[16]  M. Mason.  From father's property to children's rights : the history of child custody in the United States , 1996 .

[17]  S. Kunen,et al.  Attitudes of Quebec Superior Court Judges Regarding Child Custody and Visitation Issues , 1996 .

[18]  S. Kunen,et al.  Judicial Attitudes Regarding Custody and Visitation Issues , 1996 .

[19]  S. Riger,et al.  Gender bias in courtroom dynamics , 1995 .

[20]  Jane Dixon,et al.  The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Jeffery T. Ulmer.  TRIAL JUDGES IN A RURAL COURT COMMUNITY , 1994 .

[22]  A. Ambert,et al.  Dividing the Child: Social and Legal Dilemmas of Custody , 1993 .

[23]  Roy B. Flemming,et al.  The Craft of Justice: Politics and Work in Criminal Court Communities , 1993 .

[24]  Christine L. Williams.  The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the “Female” Professions , 1992 .

[25]  Elizabeth S. Scott.  Pluralism, Parental Preference, and Child Custody , 1992 .

[26]  Paul Brace,et al.  Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior , 1992 .

[27]  Roy B. Flemming,et al.  The contours of justice: Communities and their courts , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[28]  C. Schneider.  Discretion, Rules, and Law: Child Custody and the UMDA's Best-Interest Standard , 1991 .

[29]  Roger Handberg,et al.  Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88 , 1991 .

[30]  W. O'barr,et al.  Rules versus relationships : the ethnography of legal discourse , 1991 .

[31]  Donald R. Songer,et al.  The Impact of Party and Region On Voting Decisions in the United States Courts of Appeals, 1955-1986 , 1990 .

[32]  M. Roberts,et al.  Custody decisions in Alabama before and after the abolition of the tender years doctrine , 1990 .

[33]  Kathleen Daly.  RETHINKING JUDICIAL PATERNALISM: , 1989 .

[34]  Katherine T Bartlett.  Re-expressing parenthood. , 1988, The Yale law journal.

[35]  Martha A. Myers,et al.  SOCIAL BACKGROUND AND THE SENTENCING BEHAVIOR OF JUDGES , 1988 .

[36]  D. J. Harris,et al.  The Tenor of Justice : Criminal Courts and the Guilty Plea Process , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[37]  L. Bloom,et al.  Child custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals. , 1986 .

[38]  T. A. Bishop,et al.  Child Custody: Practices and Perspectives of Legal Professionals , 1985 .

[39]  D. L. Chambers.  Rethinking the Substantive Rules for Custody Disputes in Divorce , 1984 .

[40]  John Hagan,et al.  Changing Conceptions of Race: Toward an Account of Anomalous Findings of Sentencing Research , 1984 .

[41]  P. Munson,et al.  Legal Change and Child Custody Awards , 1982 .

[42]  C. Lowery.  Child custody decisions in divorce proceedings: A survey of judges. , 1981 .

[43]  S. Welch,et al.  Women as Policymakers: The Case of Trial Judges , 1981 .

[44]  J. Gibson.  Personality and Elite Political Behavior: The Influence of Self Esteem on Judicial Decision Making , 1981, The Journal of Politics.

[45]  Stewart Macaulay.  Lawyers and Consumer Protection Laws , 1979 .

[46]  J. Gibson.  Judges' Role Orientations, Attitudes, and Decisions: An Interactive Model , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[47]  J. Gibson.  RACE AS A DETERMINANT OF CRIMINAL SENTENCES: A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIQUE AND A CASE STUDY , 1978 .

[48]  H. Jacob,et al.  Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts , 1977 .

[49]  Susette M. Talarico,et al.  Urban Politics and the Criminal Courts , 1977 .

[50]  W. Gaylin.  Partial justice;: A study of bias in sentencing , 1975 .

[51]  S. Ulmer.  Social Background as an Indicator to the Votes of Supreme Court Justices in Criminal Cases: 1947-1956 Terms , 1973 .

[52]  S. Nagel.  Political Party Affiliation and Judges' Decisions , 1961, American Political Science Review.

[53]  C. Mills.  Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive , 1940 .

[54]  O. Holmes.  Law in Science and Science in Law , 1899 .

[55]  M. Hall,et al.  "Haves" versus "have nots" in state supreme courts: Allocating docket space and wins in power asymmetric cases , 2001 .

[56]  James J. Brudney,et al.  Designated diffidence: District Court Judges on the Courts of Appeals , 2001 .

[57]  Scott Phillips,et al.  Judicial rhetoric, meaning-making, and the institutionalization of hate crime law , 2000 .

[58]  Austin D. Sarat,et al.  Folk Knowledge as Legal Action: Death Penalty Judgments and the Tenet of Early Release in a Culture of Mistrust and Punitiveness , 1999 .

[59]  R. Hartley,et al.  Attorney Expertise, Litigant Success, and Judicial Decisionmaking in the U.S. Courts of Appeals , 1999 .

[60]  Paul J. Wahlbeck.  The development of a legal rule : The federal common law of public nuisance , 1998 .

[61]  S. Silbey,et al.  Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: toward a sociology of narrative , 1995 .

[62]  Austin D. Sarat.  Speaking of death: Narratives of violence in capital trials , 1993 .

[63]  Sheri L. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Intent: Do We Know How Legal Standards Work? , 1991 .

[64]  M. Fineman.  The Illusion of Equality , 1991 .

[65]  P. Chesler.  Mothers on trial : the battle for children and custody , 1987 .

[66]  Kathleen Daly.  Structure and Practice of Familial-Based Justice in a Criminal Court , 1987 .

[67]  S. Silbey,et al.  Critical Traditions in Law and Society Research , 1987 .

[68]  J. Elster.  Solomonic Judgments: Against the Best Interest of the Child , 1987 .

[69]  M. L. Palley,et al.  Women and public policies , 1982 .

[70]  R. Mnookin.  Bargaining in the shadow of the law : the case of devorce , 1979 .

[71]  R. Mnookin.  Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy. , 1975 .

[72]  J. Goldstein,et al.  Before the Best Interests of the Child , 1973 .