Faster-is-slower effect in escaping ants revisited: Ants do not behave like humans

In this work we studied the trajectories, velocities and densities of ants when egressing under controlled levels of stress produced by a chemical repellent at different concentrations. We found that, unlike other animals escaping under life-and-death conditions and pedestrian simulations, ants do not produce a higher density zone near the exit door. Instead, ants are uniformly distributed over the available space allowing for efficient evacuations. Consequently, the faster-is-slower effect observed in ants (Soria et al., 2012) is clearly of a different nature to that predicted by de social force model. In the case of ants, the minimum evacuation time is correlated with the lower probability of taking backward steps. Thus, as biological model ants have important differences that make their use inadvisable for the design of human facilities.

[1]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Patient and impatient pedestrians in a spatial game for egress congestion. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Daniel R. Parisi,et al.  “Faster Is Slower” Effect in Granular Flows , 2013 .

[3]  Martin Burd,et al.  Ecological consequences of traffic organisation in ant societies , 2006 .

[4]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  The Conference in Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2014 ( PED 2014 ) Experimental evidence of the “ Faster Is Slower ” effect , 2014 .

[5]  Daniel R. Parisi,et al.  Human-Ant Behavior in Evacuation Dynamics , 2015 .

[6]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Ant traffic rules , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  May Lim,et al.  Self-organized queuing and scale-free behavior in real escape panic , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Seyfried,et al.  The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited , 2005, physics/0506170.

[9]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective Decision-Making and Foraging Patterns in Ants and Honeybees , 2008 .

[10]  G. Keinan,et al.  Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under physical threat , 1987 .

[11]  Guylène Proulx,et al.  Panic or not in fire: Clarifying the misconception , 2012 .

[12]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Amplification of individual preferences in a social context: the case of wall-following in ants , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions , 2004, Nature.

[14]  Alexander John,et al.  Trafficlike collective movement of ants on trails: absence of a jammed phase. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[15]  Daniel R. Parisi,et al.  Efficient Egress of Escaping Ants Stressed with Temperature , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Using non-human biological entities to understand pedestrian crowd behaviour under emergency conditions , 2014 .

[17]  Daniel R. Parisi,et al.  Experimental evidence of the "Faster is Slower" effect in the evacuation of ants , 2012 .

[18]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[19]  C. Dorso,et al.  Morphological and dynamical aspects of the room evacuation process , 2007 .

[20]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..