Accuracy in the estimation of food servings against the portions in food photographs

Objective:In diet surveys, quantitative underestimation of food consumption may be due to intentional misreporting or false portion-size reporting. Perception of food photographs used as aids for assessing the actual amounts may have an effect. This study was carried out to assess the validity of food photographs.Design:A real-time test protocol where 52 presented food servings were compared against photographed portions with similar food items.Subjects:Volunteers from the Rehabilitation Company Petrea (in Turku) were recruited, 161 adults participated, and for 146 subjects, complete data were collected.Methods:The proportions of correct estimations and reporting errors, in weights and percentages, are presented by gender and food group. Food descriptors, portion-size options and subject characteristics were studied as potential determinants of accuracy in portion-size estimation.Results:The total proportion of exactly correct estimations was 51% in men and 49% in women. The overall reporting error was −10 g in men and +1 g in women for the 52 food servings. Underreporting was typical for bread, spread and cold cuts and dishes in both genders. Over-reporting was typical for cereals in both genders and for snacks, vegetables and fruit in women. The estimation error was associated with the portion-size options but not associated with the energy density of food items, education or body mass index.Conclusions:Food portions in photographs seem to be a useful aid for the quantification of most food items. However, validation studies are needed to test the applicability of photographs for estimating current portions and for searching better tools in dietary surveys.

[1]  B. Popkin,et al.  Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977-1998. , 2003, JAMA.

[2]  M Nelson,et al.  Food photographs: practical guidelines I. Design and analysis of studies to validate portion size estimates. , 1998, Public health nutrition.

[3]  M. Pekkarinen.  Methodology in the collection of food consumption data. , 1970, World review of nutrition and dietetics.

[4]  Karvetti Rl,et al.  Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall. , 1985 .

[5]  E Chambers,et al.  Cognitive strategies for reporting portion sizes using dietary recall procedures. , 2000, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[6]  S. Männistö,et al.  Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys , 1997, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[7]  J. Scott,et al.  Intentional mis-reporting of food consumption and its relationship with body mass index and psychological scores in women. , 2004, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[8]  A. Subar,et al.  Low energy reporters vs others: a comparison of reported food intakes , 2000, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[9]  L. Ovesen,et al.  Size makes a difference , 2003, Public Health Nutrition.

[10]  N Slimani,et al.  Structure of the standardized computerized 24-h diet recall interview used as reference method in the 22 centers participating in the EPIC project. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. , 1999, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[11]  Albert F. Smith.  Cognitive processes in long-term dietary recall , 1991 .

[12]  G. Ayala,et al.  An experimental evaluation of a group- versus computer-based intervention to improve food portion size estimation skills. , 2006, Health education research.

[13]  H. Boeing,et al.  Portion size adds limited information on variance in food intake of participants in the EPIC-Potsdam study. , 2003, The Journal of nutrition.

[14]  L. Valsta.  The 1997 Dietary Survey of Finnish adults , 1998 .

[15]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Unit Bias , 2006, Psychological science.

[16]  Salomaa,et al.  Suomalaisten sydän- ja verisuonitautien riskitekijät FINRISKI-tutkimuksessa 1982-2002 , 2003 .

[17]  M. Nelson,et al.  Food photographs: practical guidelines II. Development and use of photographic atlases for assessing food portion size. , 1998, Public health nutrition.

[18]  F. G. Berzolari,et al.  An evaluation of a colour food photography atlas as a tool for quantifying food portion size in epidemiological dietary surveys , 2005, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[19]  J. Palmgren,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. II. A qualitative food frequency questionnaire. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  C. Frobisher,et al.  The estimation of food portion sizes: a comparison between using descriptions of portion sizes and a photographic food atlas by children and adults. , 2003, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[21]  Sandria L. Godwin,et al.  Portion size estimation and expectation of accuracy , 2006 .

[22]  R L Karvetti,et al.  Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall. , 1985, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[23]  F. Clavel-Chapelon,et al.  Estimation of food portion size using photographs: validity, strengths, weaknesses and recommendations , 1995 .

[24]  J. Palmgren,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.