Activity sampling in the assessment of patients with total joint arthroplasty.

Quantitative assessment of patient activity is important in evaluating the outcomes of joint prostheses, and such methods are gaining popularity. The single greatest impediment to quantitative activity assessment is patient compliance. How many days of sampling are necessary to provide reliable and accurate estimates of walking activity? The current study analyzes how well sampling for 4 consecutive days of activity compares to assessing activity for 7 or more days with the same pedometer in 131 patients with either a total hip or total knee prosthesis. The mean steps per day obtained throughout the full-length sampling (7-123 days) was strongly correlated to the one obtained from the random consecutive 4-day sample (r2 = 0.94, P < .001) with only 5 outliers. The 4-day activity assessment gave an underestimation of 4.7% (P = .5). The number of outliers increased with fewer days of sampling. Monitoring activity for 4 consecutive days yields a quantitative assessment that is within 5% of a sampling of 7 or more days.

[1]  H. Amstutz,et al.  Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  G.A.L. Meijer,et al.  Methods to assess physical activity with special reference to motion sensors and accelerometers , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Activity and socket wear in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  J F Nichols,et al.  A validation of a physical activity monitor for young and older adults. , 1992, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[5]  R. A. Binkhorst,et al.  The use of pedometer and actometer in studying daily physical activity in man. Part I: Reliability of pedometer and actometer , 1977, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[6]  C. Heisel,et al.  Short-term in vivo wear of marathon™ crosslinked polyethylene , 2004 .

[7]  D. Dowson,et al.  The effect of activity levels of total hip arthroplasty patients on socket penetration. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  D Dowson,et al.  The walking activity of patients with artificial hip joints. , 1982, Engineering in medicine.

[9]  Y Schutz,et al.  Physical activity assessment using a pedometer and its comparison with a questionnaire in a large population survey. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  R. A. Binkhorst,et al.  The use of pedometer and actometer in studying daily physical activity in man. Part II: Validity of pedometer and actometer measuring the daily physical activity , 1977, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[11]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  T. Inaoka,et al.  Correlations of pedometer readings with energy expenditure in workers during free-living daily activities , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[13]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  J. Moreland,et al.  Wear Is a Function of Use, Not Time , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  H. Dallosso,et al.  Validation of a simple mechanical accelerometer (pedometer) for the estimation of walking activity , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[17]  T P Schmalzried,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Walking Activity after Total Hip or Knee Replacement* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  K. Janz Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children's physical activity. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  D Dowson,et al.  Comparative study of the activity of total hip arthroplasty patients and normal subjects. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  T. Schmalzried,et al.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  B. Seedhom,et al.  Walking activities and wear of prostheses. , 1985, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  Mauricio Silva,et al.  Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year: pedometers under-record walking activity. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  M. Silva,et al.  Short-term in vivo wear of cross-linked polyethylene. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.