Course material delivery in engineering using brain-based learning techniques

Although student engagement issues inside engineering classrooms have several components, we focus our attention in this paper mainly on two issues: the dis-engagement arising due to the lack of understanding of pre-requisites and insufficient mathematical skills of students reaching junior and senior engineering classes. As a first step, a pilot study was conducted at two engineering schools, including an Historically Black College/University (HBCU). The primary aim was to identify the issues that lead to attention problems and underperformance of students. The preliminary results indicate that at both institutions, many students reaching junior classes need repeated review of the pre-requisite concepts before introducing a higher-level concept within the course. We also notice that several students still need assistance in reviewing the basic and essential mathematical skills to be fully engaged in junior and senior classes. This paper summarizes the efforts currently undertaken to develop a course delivery framework that is developed based on brain-based learning theories to address some of these issues. We introduce brain-based learning tools as mandatory teaching protocols in the proposed framework. With the implementation of this framework, we envision an engaged classroom, with effective learning in junior and senior engineering classes thus leading to persistence to engineering.

[1]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[3]  Ruth A. Streveler,et al.  Learning about engineering education research: What conceptual difficulties still exist for a new generation of scholars? , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[4]  Eric Hamilton,et al.  Conceptualizing Engagement: Contributions of Faculty to Student Engagement in Engineering , 2008 .

[5]  Denise H. Daniels,et al.  Explaining Within-Semester Changes in Student Effort in Junior High School and Senior High School Courses. , 1991 .

[6]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Introduction to the special section on motivation and efficacy. , 1990 .

[7]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Discipline-centered post-secondary science education research: Understanding university level science learning , 2013 .

[8]  Joseph B. Berger,et al.  THE ROLE OF STUDENT INVOLVEMENT AND PERCEPTIONS OF INTEGRATION IN A CAUSAL MODEL OF STUDENT PERSISTENCE , 1999 .

[9]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[10]  A. Astin Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. , 1999 .

[11]  A. Hurford,et al.  Combining collaborative workspaces with tablet computing: Research in learner engagement and conditions of flow , 2007, 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports.

[12]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[13]  Paul Kauffmann,et al.  Aptitude and Personality Traits in Retention of Engineering Students , 2015 .

[14]  J. Nicholls Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. , 1984 .

[15]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages* , 2006 .