Features, as well as space and time, guide object persistence

What role do surface features (e.g., color) play in the establishment and maintenance of episodic representations of objects (object files)? Mitroff and Alvarez (2007) showed that stimuli that were linked by a continuous spatiotemporal history yielded object-specific preview benefits—a standard index of object files—whereas stimuli linked only by shared surface features did not. Here, it is shown that abruptly changing the features of an object that has been established on the basis of spatiotemporal history can disrupt object-specific preview benefits (Experiments 1 and 2). Moreover, under some conditions, feature match alone can give rise to the preview benefits (Experiment 3). These results indicate that surface features, as well as spatiotemporal factors, play an important role in establishing and maintaining episodic object representations.

[1]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Jonathan Flombaum,et al.  Spatiotemporal priority as a fundamental principle of object persistence , 2009 .

[3]  Josef Ternus,et al.  The problem of phenomenal identity. , 1938 .

[4]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues , 2009, Cognition.

[6]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Updating and the Flash-Lag Effect , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  P A Kolers,et al.  Figural change in apparent motion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Establishing object correspondence across eye movements: Flexible use of spatiotemporal and surface feature information , 2008, Cognition.

[11]  P. A. Kolers.  Aspects of motion perception , 1972 .

[12]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[13]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  M. Dawson,et al.  The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. , 1991, Psychological review.

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  A. Michotte.  The perception of causality , 1963 .

[18]  B. Scholl.  Object Persistence in Philosophy and Psychology , 2007 .

[19]  P. Burt,et al.  Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. , 1981, Psychological review.

[20]  James T. Enns,et al.  The path of least persistence: Object status mediates visual updating , 2007, Vision Research.