Effect of phonetic complexity on word reading and repetition in deep dyslexia

Abstract This investigation moves beyond the traditional studies of word reading to identify how the production complexity of words affects reading accuracy in an individual with deep dyslexia (JO). We examined JO’s ability to read words aloud while manipulating both the production complexity of the words and the semantic context. The classification of words as either phonetically simple or complex was based on the Index of Phonetic Complexity. The semantic context was varied using a semantic blocking paradigm (i.e., semantically blocked and unblocked conditions). In the semantically blocked condition words were grouped by semantic categories (e.g., table, sit, seat, couch), whereas in the unblocked condition the same words were presented in a random order. JO’s performance on reading aloud was also compared to her performance on a repetition task using the same items. Results revealed a strong interaction between word complexity and semantic blocking for reading aloud but not for repetition. JO produced the greatest number of errors for phonetically complex words in semantically blocked condition. This interaction suggests that semantic processes are constrained by output production processes which are exaggerated when derived from visual rather than auditory targets. This complex relationship between orthographic, semantic, and phonetic processes highlights the need for word recognition models to explicitly account for production processes.

[1]  M. Gazzaniga The new cognitive neurosciences, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[2]  Deep dyslexia and semantic errors: A test of the failure of inhibition hypothesis using a semantic blocking paradigm , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  Peter Howell,et al.  Predicting stuttering from phonetic complexity in German. , 2004, Journal of fluency disorders.

[4]  Christopher Dromey,et al.  Effects of concurrent motor, linguistic, or cognitive tasks on speech motor performance. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  Neeraja Sadagopan,et al.  Developmental changes in the effects of utterance length and complexity on speech movement variability. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  P. Howell,et al.  Phonetic difficulty and stuttering in English , 2006, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[7]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[8]  C. Westbury,et al.  Semantics and semantic errors: Implicit access to semantic information from words and nonwords in deep dyslexia , 2003, Brain and Language.

[9]  Implicit and explicit processing in deep dyslexia: Semantic blocking as a test for failure of inhibition in the phonological output lexicon , 2006, Brain and Language.

[10]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  The neural correlates of language production , 2000 .

[11]  P. Howell,et al.  Phonetic complexity and stuttering in Spanish , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[12]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Judith A. Gierut,et al.  Complexity in Phonological Treatment: Clinical Factors. , 2001, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[14]  Judith A. Gierut,et al.  Phonological Treatment Efficacy and Developmental Norms , 1996 .

[15]  B. Horwitz,et al.  Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Garrett,et al.  When reading a sentence is easier than reading a ‘little’ word: The role of production processes in deep dyslexics' reading aloud , 1998 .

[17]  Lori Buchanan,et al.  Localizing damage in the functional architecture: The distinction between implicit and explicit processing in deep dyslexia , 2007, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[18]  A phonetic analysis of vowel errors during the course of treatment , 1999 .

[19]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  Acquisition of Speech Production: Frames, Then Content , 2018, Attention and Performance XIII.

[20]  W. Huber,et al.  Deep dysphasia as a phonetic input deficit: Evidence from a single case , 2008 .

[21]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Deep Dyslexia Is Right-Hemisphere Reading , 2000, Brain and Language.

[22]  S. Lanzoni,et al.  Automatic Activation of Word Phonology from Print in Deep Dyslexia , 1992 .

[23]  Anne Smith Speech motor development: Integrating muscles, movements, and linguistic units. , 2006, Journal of communication disorders.

[24]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters , 2006 .

[25]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deep Dyslexia: A Case Study of , 1993 .

[26]  A. Bose,et al.  Effects of utterance length on lip kinematics in aphasia , 2008, Brain and Language.

[27]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  K. Jakielski,et al.  Motor organization in the acquisition of consonant clusters , 1998 .

[32]  A Smith,et al.  Influences of utterance length and complexity on speech motor performance in children and adults. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Functional Neuroimaging Description of Two Deep Dyslexic Patients , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.