Biologically Inspired Hexagonal Deep Learning For Hexagonal Image Generation

Whereas conventional state-of-the-art image processing systems of recording and output devices almost exclusively utilize square arranged methods, biological models, however, suggest an alternative, evolutionarily-based structure. Inspired by the human visual perception system, hexagonal image processing in the context of machine learning offers a number of key advantages that can benefit both researchers and users alike. The hexagonal deep learning framework Hexnet leveraged in this contribution serves therefore the generation of hexagonal images by utilizing hexagonal deep neural networks (H-DNN). As the results of our created test environment show, the proposed models can surpass current approaches of conventional image generation. While resulting in a reduction of the models’ complexity in the form of trainable parameters, they furthermore allow an increase of test rates in comparison to their square counterparts.

[1]  K. Sahr,et al.  Discrete Global Grid Systems , 1998 .

[2]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[3]  Michael Friedrich,et al.  Hexagonal Image Processing in the Context of Machine Learning: Conception of a Biologically Inspired Hexagonal Deep Learning Framework , 2019, 2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA).

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Colin P.D. Birch,et al.  Rectangular and hexagonal grids used for observation, experiment and simulation in ecology , 2007 .

[6]  Marcel J. E. Golay,et al.  Hexagonal Parallel Pattern Transformations , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[7]  P. Burt Tree and pyramid structures for coding hexagonally sampled binary images , 1980 .

[8]  Jayanthi Sivaswamy,et al.  Hexagonal Image Processing: A Practical Approach , 2014, Advances in Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data , 2016, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[10]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Optimal regular volume sampling , 2001, Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS '01..

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Hai Yang,et al.  Hexagon-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Supply-Demand Forecasting of Ride-Sourcing Services , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  David Middleton,et al.  Sampling and Reconstruction of Wave-Number-Limited Functions in N-Dimensional Euclidean Spaces , 1962, Inf. Control..

[14]  M. Trimpl,et al.  The DEPFET pixel BIOSCOPE , 1999 .

[15]  Innchyn Her,et al.  Resampling on a Pseudohexagonal Grid , 1994, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[16]  R. J. Green,et al.  Fingerprint classification using a hexagonal fast fourier transform , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Stacked What-Where Auto-encoders , 2015, ArXiv.

[18]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. , 1987, Science.

[19]  Neil Storey,et al.  A Comparison Between Square and Hexagonal Sampling Methods for Pipeline Image Processing , 1990, Other Conferences.

[20]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  Conditional Image Synthesis with Auxiliary Classifier GANs , 2016, ICML.

[21]  T. Lohse,et al.  Application of deep learning methods to analysis of imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescopes data , 2018, Astroparticle Physics.

[22]  Tim Lukas Holch,et al.  HexagDLy - Processing hexagonally sampled data with CNNs in PyTorch , 2019, SoftwareX.