.......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 5 I. Database Development ..................................................................................... 5 Aquatic (Fish and Invertebrates)................................................................ 5 Wildlife (Birds and Mammals) .................................................................... 6 II. Model Development.......................................................................................... 6 III. Model Validation .............................................................................................. 7 Using the Web-ICE Program........................................................................................... 8 I. Working with Web-ICE Aquatic or Web-ICE Wildlife Modules ........................... 9 Selecting Model Taxa ................................................................................ 9 Estimating Toxicity................................................................................... 10 II. The Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) Module ........................................ 11 Generating an SSD:................................................................................. 14 III. The Endangered Species Module.................................................................. 14 Producing an Endangered Species Toxicity Report................................. 14 IV. Accessing Model Data................................................................................... 16 Guidance for Model Selection and Use ......................................................................... 17 I. Statistical Definitions ....................................................................................... 17 II. Selecting a Model with Low Uncertainty ......................................................... 18 Rules of Thumb........................................................................................ 18 Surrogate Species Selection: An Example .............................................. 19 III. Evaluating Model Predictions ........................................................................ 19 IV. Selecting Predicted Toxicity Values for SSDs ............................................... 20 V. Applying Web-ICE in Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA).............................. 20 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 22 References.................................................................................................................... 22 Appendices ................................................................................................................... 25
[1]
S. Raimondo,et al.
Estimation of Wildlife Hazard Levels Using Interspecies Correlation Models and Standard Laboratory Rodent Toxicity Data
,
2009,
Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.
[2]
M. Ellersieck,et al.
Manual of acute toxicity: interpretation and data base for 410 chemicals and 66 species of freshwater animals
,
1986
.
[3]
S. Raimondo,et al.
Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models.
,
2008,
Environmental science & technology.
[4]
A. Fairbrother.
Risk Management Safety Factor
,
2008
.
[5]
Deborah N. Vivian,et al.
Standardizing acute toxicity data for use in ecotoxicology models: influence of test type, life stage, and concentration reporting
,
2009,
Ecotoxicology.
[6]
Deborah N. Vivian,et al.
Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment
,
2008,
Environmental toxicology and chemistry.
[7]
W A Bowles,et al.
Acute oral toxicity and repellency of 933 chemicals to house and deer mice
,
1985,
Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.
[8]
S. Dyer,et al.
Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria.
,
2008,
Environmental science & technology.
[9]
S. Mather,et al.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
,
1997
.
[10]
S. Raimondo,et al.
Influence of taxonomic relatedness and chemical mode of action in acute interspecies estimation models for aquatic species.
,
2010,
Environmental science & technology.
[11]
D. Zwart.
Observed Regularities in Species Sensitivity Distributions for Aquatic Species
,
2001
.
[12]
S. Dyer,et al.
Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations.
,
2006,
Environmental science & technology.
[13]
J. Duffe,et al.
Pesticide acute toxicity reference values for birds.
,
2001,
Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.
[14]
R. Tucker,et al.
Handbook of toxicity of pesticides to wildlife
,
1984
.
[15]
P. Mineau,et al.
Estimation of chemical toxicity to wildlife species using interspecies correlation models.
,
2007,
Environmental science & technology.
[16]
G. J. Smith.
Pesticide Use and Toxicology in Relation to Wildlife: Organophosphorus and Carbamate , Compounds
,
1987
.
[17]
E. Schafer,et al.
The acute oral toxicity, repellency, and hazard potential of 998 chemicals to one or more species of wild and domestic birds
,
1983,
Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.