Assessing the quality of surgical care in vascular surgery; moving from outcome towards structural and process measures.

OBJECTIVES This study presents a review of studies reporting on quality of care in vascular surgery. The aim of this study was to provide insight in quality improvement initiatives in vascular surgery. DESIGN Original data were collected from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were: description of one of the three factors of quality of care, e.g. process, outcome or structure and prospectively described. All articles identified were ascribed to a domain of quality of care. RESULTS 57 prospective articles were included, drawn from 859 eligible reports. Structure as an indicator of quality of care was described in 19 reports, process in 7 reports and outcome in 31 reports. Most studies based on structural measures considered the introduction of a clinical pathway or a registration system. Reports based on process measures showed promising results. Outcome as clinical indicator mainly focussed on identifying risk factors for morbidity, mortality or failure of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Structure and process indicators are evaluated scarcely in vascular surgery. Many studies in vascular surgery have been focussed on outcomes as indicator of quality of care, but a shift towards process measures should be considered as focus of attention in the future.

[1]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Impact of renal insufficiency on short-term morbidity and mortality after lower extremity revascularization: data from the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[2]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Hemodialysis vascular access preferences and outcomes in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). , 2002, Kidney international.

[3]  Richard J. Burns,et al.  South Australian carotid endarterectomy study , 1991, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  J. H. van Bockel,et al.  Vascular morbidity and mortality during long-term follow-up in claudicants selected for peripheral bypass surgery. , 1998, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[5]  A. Donabedian Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. , 1966, The Milbank quarterly.

[6]  S. Barker,et al.  Integrated care pathways for vascular surgery: an analysis of the first 18 months , 2002, Postgraduate medical journal.

[7]  H. Welch,et al.  The zero mortality paradox in surgery. , 2008 .

[8]  P. J. M. Bayly,et al.  In‐hospital mortality from abdominal aortic surgery in Great Britain and Ireland: Vascular Anaesthesia Society audit , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  E. Mascha,et al.  Early outcome assessment for 2228 consecutive carotid endarterectomy procedures: the Cleveland Clinic experience from 1989 to 1995. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  M. Suarez‐Almazor,et al.  Improving the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy: results of a prospective city-wide study. , 1999, Stroke.

[11]  L. Norgren,et al.  Vascular surgical audit during a 5-year period. Steering committee on behalf of the Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc). , 1994, European journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  W. Henderson,et al.  Early outcomes of endovascular versus open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Private Sector (NSQIP-PS). , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  P. Dimakakos,et al.  Impact of Carotid Endarterectomy Critical Pathway on Surgical Outcome and Hospital Stay , 1998 .

[14]  S. Georgopoulos,et al.  Current practice--routine use of shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Cost reduction and surgical training. , 2001, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[15]  I. Woodforth,et al.  Risk factors for peri-operative stroke complicating carotid endarterectomy: selective analysis of a prospective audit of 1000 consecutive operations. , 2000, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[16]  A. Kappetein,et al.  The value of a mortality-scoring system in the quality control of patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[17]  W. Henderson,et al.  Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: vascular surgical operations in men. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[18]  P. Breslau,et al.  Recording and classification of complications in a surgical practice. , 1999, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[19]  The role of a defined protocol for cardiac risk assessment in decreasing perioperative myocardial infarction in vascular surgery. , 1992, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  P. Blankestijn,et al.  Implementation of a vascular access quality programme improves vascular access care. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[21]  R. Lusby,et al.  Microcomputer database and system of audit for the vascular surgeon. , 1990, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[22]  J. Pomposelli,et al.  Surgical complication outcome (SCOUT) score: a new method to evaluate quality of care in vascular surgery. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  Peter K Henke,et al.  Risk for stroke after elective noncarotid vascular surgery. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  R. Holdsworth,et al.  Results and resource implications of treating end-stage limb ischaemia. , 1997, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[25]  R. Sayers,et al.  Prosthetic patch infection after carotid endarterectomy. , 2002, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[26]  G. Maddern,et al.  Predictors of success following endovascular aneurysm repair: mid-term results. , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[27]  P. Hayes,et al.  A prospective audit of complex wound and graft infections in Great Britain and Ireland: the emergence of MRSA. , 2001, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[28]  I. Thomson,et al.  Vascular trauma in New Zealand: an 11-year review of NZVASC, the New Zealand Society of Vascular Surgeons' audit database. , 2004, The New Zealand medical journal.

[29]  Rourke Aj Evaluating the quality of medical care. , 1957, Hospital progress.

[30]  J. Daley Criteria by which to evaluate risk-adjusted outcomes programs in cardiac surgery. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[31]  P. Hayes,et al.  Reducing the risk of carotid surgery: a 7-year audit of the role of monitoring and quality control assessment. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[32]  A L Shroyer,et al.  A Decade’s Experience With Quality Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Databases , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[33]  A. Bradbury,et al.  The influence of gender on outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[34]  P. Taylor,et al.  Cost‐effective carotid endarterectomy , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[35]  W. Henderson,et al.  Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: vascular surgical operations in women. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[36]  R. Thomson,et al.  A regional collaborative audit of the practice and outcome of carotid endarterectomy in the United Kingdom. Northern Regional Carotid Endarterectomy Audit Group. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[37]  P. Kreienberg,et al.  Can the Cost of Distal Vascular Reconstruction be Reduced Without Sacrificing Quality? Analysis of 500 Cases , 2000 .

[38]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[39]  M. Lepäntalo,et al.  Diabetes as an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications in critical limb ischemia. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[40]  E. Debing,et al.  Does the type, number or combinations of traditional cardiovascular risk factors affect early outcome after carotid endarterectomy? , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[41]  J. R. Schneider,et al.  Impact of Carotid Endarterectomy Critical Pathway on Surgical Outcome and Hospital Stay , 1997 .

[42]  K. Itani,et al.  Does resident hours reduction have an impact on surgical outcomes? , 2005, The Journal of surgical research.

[43]  A. Naylor,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy without angiography does not compromise operative outcome. , 1998, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[44]  R. Hayward,et al.  Perioperative cardiovascular risk stratification of patients with diabetes who undergo elective major vascular surgery. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[45]  S. Middleton,et al.  Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy: how does the Australian state of New South Wales compare with international benchmarks? , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[46]  P. McCollum,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy in the U.K. and Ireland: audit of 30-day outcome. The Audit Committee for the Vascular Surgical Society. , 1997, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[47]  David R Flum,et al.  Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[48]  A. Yip,et al.  Diabetes and the outcome of infrainguinal bypass for critical limb ischaemia , 2004, ANZ journal of surgery.

[49]  D. Likosky,et al.  A regional registry for quality assurance and improvement: the Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE). , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[50]  V. Pettilä,et al.  Decrease of mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after centralization and in-hospital quality improvement of vascular service. , 2007, Annals of vascular surgery.

[51]  K. Itani,et al.  Assessing the quality of surgical care. , 2007, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[52]  O. Jonasson,et al.  The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[53]  P. Breslau,et al.  Can the Incidence of Unplanned Reoperations Be Used as an Indicator of Quality of Care in Surgery? , 2007, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[54]  Michael L. Johnson,et al.  Propensity score analysis in observational studies: outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[55]  J. Mainz Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. , 2003, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[56]  John A. Cowan,et al.  Effect of increasing patient age on complication rates following intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States. , 2004, The Journal of surgical research.

[57]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[58]  M. Crane,et al.  The Pitfalls of Establishing a Statewide Vascular Registry: The South Carolina Experience , 1999, The American surgeon.

[59]  G. Maddern,et al.  The Outcome of Endovascular Repair of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[60]  Brandie D Wagner,et al.  Improving Quality of Care in Cardiac Surgery: Evaluating Risk Factors, Processes of Care, Structures of Care, and Outcomes , 2008, Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[61]  Florence E. Turrentine,et al.  Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[62]  J. Dimick,et al.  Measuring and improving the quality of care for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. , 2008, Circulation.

[63]  T. J. van der Steenhoven,et al.  Mortality after Peripheral Bypass Surgery: Value of a Mortality Scoring System in Evaluating the Quality of Care , 2004, Vascular.

[64]  G. Maddern,et al.  Australian audit for the endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: The first 12 months , 2002, ANZ journal of surgery.

[65]  A. Bradbury,et al.  Training in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair: 1987-1997. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[66]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Clinical and radiographic risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European carotid surgery trial. , 2002, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[67]  Daniel R Wong,et al.  Defining the high-risk patient for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[68]  Peter H Lin,et al.  Performance of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in high-risk patients: results from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[69]  L. Neumayer,et al.  Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: general surgical operations in men. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[70]  L. Neumayer,et al.  Multivariable predictors of postoperative surgical site infection after general and vascular surgery: results from the patient safety in surgery study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[71]  Endoluminal repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm-contemporary Australian experience. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.