Difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size, and its effect on postoperative incontinence.

PURPOSE We assessed whether a difference between intraoperative urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size affects postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated the medical records of 87 males who underwent implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter between January 2006 and May 2010. A validated questionnaire was completed by 59 patients for long-term followup. The difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size was calculated. Incontinence was recorded as daily pad use. The primary outcome variable was the postoperative decrease in incontinence. Multivariable linear regression was used to model the effect on postoperative incontinence of the difference between urethral circumference and cuff size. RESULTS Mean long-term followup was 4.2 years. Median preoperative incontinence was 8 pads per day and median abdominal leak point pressure was 50 cm H2O. Median urethral circumference was 38 mm and the median difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size was 2.5 mm. Median postoperative incontinence was 1 pad per day. A 1 mm increase in the difference between urethral circumference and cuff size resulted in a 1.6% increase in incontinence by 4.5 months postoperatively (95% CI -3.1-6.2, p = 0.487). Paradoxically, each 1 mm increase improved postoperative continence at long-term followup by 29% (95% CI -15-56, p = 0.162). CONCLUSIONS At 4.5-month followup there was no statistical difference in pad use or patient satisfaction when the difference between urethral circumference and artificial urinary sphincter cuff size was less than 4 mm vs 4 mm or greater. However, at long-term followup the 4 mm or greater group reported statistically significantly better continence and satisfaction than the less than 4 mm group. This study does not support efforts to improve continence by minimizing cuff size but rather suggests that modestly up-sizing the cuff may produce improved long-term outcomes.

[1]  G. Webster,et al.  Artificial urinary sphincter: lessons learned. , 2011, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[2]  K. B. Kim,et al.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[3]  S. Hudak,et al.  Impact of 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff on primary and revision surgery for male stress urinary incontinence. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Simon P. Kim,et al.  Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[5]  C. Sutton,et al.  The fate of the 'modern' artificial urinary sphincter with a follow-up of more than 10 years. , 1997, British journal of urology.

[6]  G. Webster,et al.  Outcomes following revisions and secondary implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[7]  S. Hunskaar,et al.  Relevance and variability of the severity of incontinence, and increased daytime and night‐time voiding frequency, associated with quality of life in men with lower urinary tract symptoms , 2005, BJU international.

[8]  P. Abrams,et al.  Surgical treatment of stress incontinence in men , 2010, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[9]  A. Markland,et al.  Prevalence of urinary incontinence in men: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[10]  D. Paolone,et al.  Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[11]  E. B. Butler,et al.  13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[12]  H. Sandvik,et al.  A severity index for epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence: Comparison with 48‐hour pad‐weighing tests , 2000, Neurourology and urodynamics.