Analysis of neuroretinal rim distribution and vascular pattern in eyes with presumed large physiological cupping: a comparative study

BackgroundTo investigate possible differences in neuroretinal rim distribution, vascular pattern, and peripapillary region appearance between eyes with presumed large physiological optic disc cupping (pLPC) and eyes with minimal optic disc excavation.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled consecutive subjects with pLPC and individuals with minimal excavation (optic disc excavation within normal limits; control group). All eyes had normal visual fields and untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) <21 mmHg. Eyes with pLPC required vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) ≥0.6 and ≥30 months of follow-up with no evidence of glaucomatous neuropathy. For controls, VCDR was limited to ≤0.5. We compared ocular signs and characteristics related to the neuroretinal rim distribution, vascular pattern, peripapillary region appearance and disc size between groups. Whenever both eyes were eligible, one was randomly selected for analysis.ResultsA total of 74 patients (mean age, 45.6 ± 14.9 years) with pLPC and 45 controls (mean age, 44.8 ± 11.6 years) were enrolled (p = 0.76). Median disc size and VCDR was significantly larger in eyes with pLPC compared to controls (p < 0.01). The proportion of eyes with violation of the ISNT rule, laminar dot sign, nasal shifting of the central vessels, nasal excavation and baring of circumlinear vessel was significantly greater in the eyes with pLPC compared to controls (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences regarding the proportions of eyes with peripapillary atrophy between groups (p < 0.09). Finally, disc size was significantly associated with VCDR (r2 = 0.47, p < 0.01), with an increase of 0.21 in VCDR for each 1 mm2 in disc area.ConclusionCompared to normal controls, eyes with pLPC may present a higher proportion of optic nerve head findings frequently observed in glaucomatous eyes. This seems to be explained in part by the larger discs found in these eyes. We believe care should be taken while classifying them as glaucomatous or not based solely on these characteristics.

[1]  M F Armaly,et al.  The cup-disc ratio. The findings of tonometry and tonography in the normal eye. , 1969, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Wilensky,et al.  Prognostic indicators in ocular hypertension. , 1974, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  K. Nishioka,et al.  Untreated ocular hypertension. A long-term prospective study. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Herschler,et al.  Baring of the circumlinear vessel. An early sign of optic nerve damage. , 1980, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  E. Carpel,et al.  The normal cup-disk ratio. , 1981, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  R. Susanna.  The lamina cribrosa and visual field defects in open-angle glaucoma. , 1983, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[7]  J. Jonas,et al.  Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  J. Jonas,et al.  Pseudoglaucomatous physiologic large cups. , 1989, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Jonas,et al.  Glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy in small discs with low cup-to-disc ratios. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[10]  R. Varma,et al.  The Optic Nerve in Glaucoma , 1993 .

[11]  J. Jonas,et al.  Shape of the neuroretinal rim and position of the central retinal vessels in glaucoma. , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  V. Málís.  [The cup/disc ratio]. , 1995, Ceska a slovenska oftalmologie : casopis Ceske oftalmologicke spolecnosti a Slovenske oftalmologicke spolecnosti.

[13]  M. Kass,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[15]  L. Zangwill,et al.  Achromatic and short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with glaucomatous large cups. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  Jost B. Jonas,et al.  Diagnosis and pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy: morphological aspects1 1 1 1Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 539) , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[17]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002 .

[18]  E. E. Hartmann,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  P. Foster,et al.  The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  C. Kim,et al.  Optic nerve head topographic measurements and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in physiologic large cups. , 2005, Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO.

[21]  Robert Ritch,et al.  The ISNT rule and differentiation of normal from glaucomatous eyes. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  Intercurrent factors associated with the development of open-angle glaucoma in the European glaucoma prevention study. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[23]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Reproducibility of RTVue retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc measurements and agreement with Stratus optical coherence tomography measurements. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  M. Swanson.  The 97.5th and 99.5th Percentile of Vertical Cup Disc Ratio in the United States , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  Tien Yin Wong,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of the ISNT Rule for Glaucoma Based on the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph. , 2013, Translational vision science & technology.