The effectiveness of burglary security devices

This study measures the effectiveness of anti-burglary security devices, both individually and in combination. Data for 2008–2012 from the Crime Survey of England and Wales are analysed via the Security Impact Assessment Tool to estimate Security Protection Factors (SPFs). SPFs indicate the level of security conferred relative to the absence of security devices. It finds that, for individual devices, external lights and door double locks or deadlocks, are most effective but, counter-intuitively, burglar alarms and dummy alarms confer less protection than no security. Combinations of devices generate positive interaction effects that increase protection more than additively. In particular, combinations with door and window locks plus external lights or security chains confer at least 20 times greater protection against burglary with entry than no security. Although further research is needed, the findings are consistent with improved security playing an important role in long-term declines in burglary rates.

[1]  C. Nee,et al.  Expert Decision Making in Burglars , 2006 .

[2]  T. Budd,et al.  Burglary of Domestic Dwellings Findings from the British Crime Survey , 1999 .

[3]  S. Winchester,et al.  Residential Burglary: the limits of prevention , 2005 .

[4]  D. Cornish OPPORTUNITIES, PRECIPITATORS AND CRIMINAL DECISIONS: A REPLY TO WORTLEY'S CRITIQUE OF SITUATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION , 2003 .

[5]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[6]  Ken Pease,et al.  Repeat Victimisation: Taking Stock , 1998 .

[7]  Ruth Fleming,et al.  Crime in England and Wales 2009/10 , 2010 .

[8]  J. Dijk The World of Crime: Breaking the Silence on Problems of Security, Justice and Development Across the World , 2007 .

[9]  R. Posner,et al.  The Economic Epidemiology of Crime , 1996, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[10]  Jan C. van Ours,et al.  Does Regulation of Built-In Security Reduce Crime? Evidence from a Natural Experiment , 2010 .

[11]  R. Armitage,et al.  Sustaining the crime reduction impact of designing out crime: Re-evaluating the Secured by Design scheme 10 years on , 2011 .

[12]  Shane D. Johnson,et al.  Preventing repeat victimization: a systematic review , 2012 .

[13]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Income Disparities of Burglary Risk Security Availability during the Crime Drop , 2011 .

[14]  Pat Mayhew,et al.  The 1992 British crime survey , 1993 .

[15]  M. Hough,et al.  Surveying Crime in the 21st Century: Commemorating the 25th Anniversary of the British Crime Survey , 2007 .

[16]  A. Tseloni,et al.  The effectiveness of vehicle security devices and their role in the crime drop , 2011 .

[17]  Timothy Coupe,et al.  DAYLIGHT AND DARKNESS TARGETING STRATEGIES AND THE RISKS OF BEING SEEN AT RESIDENTIAL BURGLARIES , 2006 .

[18]  P. Mayhew,et al.  Criminal Victimisation in Seventeen Industrialised Countries. Key findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey , 2000 .

[19]  D. Cornish,et al.  Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention , 2003 .

[20]  A. Tseloni,et al.  The international crime drop : new directions in research , 2012 .

[21]  Neil Alan Weiner,et al.  Crime Prevention through Environmental Design , 1971 .

[22]  A. Tseloni,et al.  The International Crime Drop , 2012 .