Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials of observation versus maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission following induction treatment.

PURPOSE To investigate the value of maintenance treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer whose disease is in complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred ninety-five women (141 eligible) whose disease was in CR or in CR except for bone metastases following six cycles (6 months) of doxorubicin-containing induction treatment were randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, prednisone, tamoxifen, and halotestin [CMF(P)TH] or observation. In a previous pilot study, patients in CR after 24 months of induction treatment were randomized to continue chemotherapy for 4 more years or stop chemotherapy. RESULTS Among patients randomized to CMF(P)TH, life-threatening toxicity included leukopenia in 3%, thrombocytopenia in 3%, cardiac in 2%, and diabetes in 1%. The median time to relapse from randomization was 18.7 months on CMF(P)TH and only 7.8 months on observation (P < .0001). The median time to death was 32.2 months on CMF(P)TH and 28.7 months on observation (P=.74). Similar results were seen in the pilot study (median time to relapse, 12.6 and 6.4 months; median survival, 37.7 and 24.2 months; study too small for statistical significance). Maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in time-to-relapse models. CONCLUSION There is definite toxicity associated with CMF(P)TH maintenance treatment. When CR was obtained on induction, maintenance treatment with CMF(P)TH was never significant in survival models. However, maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in the time-to-relapse models, which motivates its consideration for appropriately informed patients.

[1]  R. Gelman,et al.  Ten-year follow-up study of premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Gelman,et al.  Reinduction with the same cytostatic treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  R. Gelman,et al.  Metastatic breast cancer: higher versus low dose maintenance treatment when only a partial response or a no change status is obtained following doxorubicin induction treatment. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. , 1992, Annals of Oncology.

[4]  R. Gelman,et al.  Factors predicting for response, time to treatment failure, and survival in women with metastatic breast cancer treated with DAVTH: a prospective Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  C. Spurr,et al.  Interrupted versus continuous chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The Piedmont Oncology Association. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Carmichael,et al.  Comparison of short-term and continuous chemotherapy (mitozantrone) for advanced breast cancer , 1990, The Lancet.

[7]  G. Cocconi,et al.  A comparison of continuation versus late intensification followed by discontinuation of chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. A prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (G.O.I.R.C.). , 1990, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  S. Lagakos,et al.  Sample size and power determination for stratified clinical trials , 1978 .

[9]  J. Peto,et al.  Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures , 1972 .

[10]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[11]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .