An Anticipatory Social Assessment of Factory-Grown Meat

On August 5, 2013, a prototype sample of cultured, or in vitro, meat was tasted at a well-publicized event in London [1]. This hamburger was not grown in an animal, but rather from bovine stem cells in Dr. Mark Post?s laboratory at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. The event may foreshadow a day when traditional livestock production has given way to large-scale growth of meat in factories, or carneries. Dr. Post has suggested that commercialization of cultured meat could be ten to twenty years away [1]. The implications are profound. By some accounts the technology could reduce the environmental impacts of meat production [2], promote human health by eliminating harmful contents such as saturated fats and pathogens [2], address global hunger issues [3], and alleviate the ethical concerns associated with industrial livestock operations [4]. However, technologies powerful enough to address such significant challenges often come with unforseen consequences and a host of costs and benefits that seldom accrue to the same actors. In extreme cases, they can even be destabilizing to social, institutional, economic, and cultural systems [5].

[1]  L. Winner DO ARTIFACTS HAVE (cid:1) POLITICS? , 2022 .

[2]  Braden Allenby,et al.  The Industrial Ecology of Emerging Technologies , 2009, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[3]  Braden Allenby,et al.  The Industrial Ecology of Emerging Technologies , 2008 .

[4]  N. Jones Food: A taste of things to come? , 2010, Nature.

[5]  J. Bartholet Inside the meat lab. , 2011, Scientific American.

[6]  C. Driessen,et al.  Emerging Profiles for Cultured Meat; Ethics through and as Design , 2013, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[7]  Z. Bhat,et al.  Animal-free Meat Biofabrication , 2011 .

[8]  M. Post Cultured meat from stem cells: challenges and prospects. , 2012, Meat science.