On August 5, 2013, a prototype sample of cultured, or in vitro, meat was tasted at a well-publicized event in London [1]. This hamburger was not grown in an animal, but rather from bovine stem cells in Dr. Mark Post?s laboratory at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. The event may foreshadow a day when traditional livestock production has given way to large-scale growth of meat in factories, or carneries. Dr. Post has suggested that commercialization of cultured meat could be ten to twenty years away [1]. The implications are profound. By some accounts the technology could reduce the environmental impacts of meat production [2], promote human health by eliminating harmful contents such as saturated fats and pathogens [2], address global hunger issues [3], and alleviate the ethical concerns associated with industrial livestock operations [4]. However, technologies powerful enough to address such significant challenges often come with unforseen consequences and a host of costs and benefits that seldom accrue to the same actors. In extreme cases, they can even be destabilizing to social, institutional, economic, and cultural systems [5].
[1]
L. Winner.
DO ARTIFACTS HAVE (cid:1) POLITICS?
,
2022
.
[2]
Braden Allenby,et al.
The Industrial Ecology of Emerging Technologies
,
2009,
Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.
[3]
Braden Allenby,et al.
The Industrial Ecology of Emerging Technologies
,
2008
.
[4]
N. Jones.
Food: A taste of things to come?
,
2010,
Nature.
[5]
J. Bartholet.
Inside the meat lab.
,
2011,
Scientific American.
[6]
C. Driessen,et al.
Emerging Profiles for Cultured Meat; Ethics through and as Design
,
2013,
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.
[7]
Z. Bhat,et al.
Animal-free Meat Biofabrication
,
2011
.
[8]
M. Post.
Cultured meat from stem cells: challenges and prospects.
,
2012,
Meat science.