Beyond patch spraying: site-specific weed management with several herbicides

Site-specific weed management can include both limiting herbicide application to areas of the field where weed pressure is above the economic threshold (patch spraying) and varying the choice of herbicide for most cost-effective weed control of local populations. The benefits of patch spraying with several, postemergence herbicides in irrigated corn were evaluated in simulation studies using weed counts from 16 fields. Patch spraying with one, two or the number of herbicides that maximized net return for a field was simulated. With patch spraying of one herbicide, the average area of a field left untreated is 34.5%. Net return increases by $3.09 ha−1 compared to a uniform application without decreasing crop yield. Additional herbicides increase the average benefits with just 4% more of the field treated. With two herbicides, the increase in net return is almost tripled and herbicide use is reduced nearly 10-fold compared to patch spraying with one herbicide, and weed control is better than the uniform application in 10 fields. Using more than two herbicides for patch spraying further reduces weed escapes, but herbicide use is greater than a uniform application in 10 fields. Growers might be more willing to adopt patch spraying if more than one herbicide is used in a field.

[1]  ANDREW J. PRICE,et al.  Evaluating the Potential for Site-Specific Herbicide Application in Soybean1 , 2004, Weed Technology.

[2]  Scott M. Swinton,et al.  GWM: General Weed Management Model , 1996 .

[3]  Roland Gerhards,et al.  The Economic Impact of Site-Specific Weed Control , 2003, Precision Agriculture.

[4]  François J. Tardif,et al.  Evaluation of site-specific weed management using a direct-injection sprayer , 2001, Weed Science.

[5]  Lori J. Wiles,et al.  Site-Specific Weed Management in Growers’ Fields: Predictions from Hand-Drawn Maps , 2007 .

[6]  Terry L. Kastens,et al.  An economic evaluation of site-specific herbicide application , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[7]  Alex Martin,et al.  A simulation of herbicide use based on weed spatial distribution , 1995 .

[8]  Lori J. Wiles,et al.  The cost of counting and identifying weed seeds and seedlings , 1999, Weed Science.

[9]  Dawn Y. Wyse-Pester,et al.  Infestation and spatial dependence of weed seedling and mature weed populations in corn , 2002, Weed Science.

[10]  Roland Gerhards,et al.  Site Specific Weed Control in Winter Wheat , 1997 .

[11]  F. E. Lamastus-Stanford,et al.  Evaluation of Site-Specific Weed Management Implementing the Herbicide Application Decision Support System (HADSS) , 2004, Precision Agriculture.

[12]  Robert P. King,et al.  Weed Management Decisions in Corn Based on Bioeconomic Modeling , 1991, Weed Science.

[13]  T. C. Mueller,et al.  Site-Specific Weed Management in Corn (Zea mays)1 , 2003, Weed Technology.

[14]  R. Gerhards,et al.  Practical experiences with a system for site‐specific weed control in arable crops using real‐time image analysis and GPS‐controlled patch spraying , 2006 .

[15]  D. Mortensen,et al.  Two-Year Weed Seedling Population Responses to a Post-Emergent Method of Site-Specific Weed Management , 2000, Precision Agriculture.

[16]  Henning Nordmeyer,et al.  Patchy weed distribution and site-specific weed control in winter cereals , 2006, Precision Agriculture.