The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without Warnings
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Chanthika Pornpitakpan. The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .
[2] B. Nyhan,et al. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .
[3] David G. Rand,et al. The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.
[4] Stephan Lewandowsky,et al. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation , 2010, Memory & cognition.
[5] Michel J. J. Handgraaf,et al. Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior , 2011 .
[6] Gregory N. Mandel,et al. The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks , 2012 .
[7] Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al. Misinformation and Its Correction , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.
[8] D. A. Kenny,et al. Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[9] P. Ubel,et al. The Hazards of Correcting Myths About Health Care Reform , 2013, Medical care.
[10] R. Kelly Garrett,et al. The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions , 2013, CSCW.
[11] Adam Seth Levine,et al. Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity , 2014, Journal of Experimental Political Science.
[12] B. Nyhan,et al. Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial , 2014, Pediatrics.
[13] Toby Bolsen,et al. Counteracting the Politicization of Science , 2015 .
[14] Thomas J. Leeper,et al. The Generalizability of Survey Experiments* , 2015, Journal of Experimental Political Science.
[15] Adam J. Berinsky,et al. Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation , 2015, British Journal of Political Science.
[16] Francesca Gino,et al. Self-Serving Justifications , 2015 .
[17] Susan Athey,et al. Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[18] Brian F. Schaffner,et al. Misinformation and Motivated ReasoningResponses to Economic News in a Politicized Environment , 2016 .
[19] Jeffrey A. Gottfried,et al. The modern news consumer: news attitudes and practices in the digital era , 2016 .
[20] B. Nyhan,et al. Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability , 2017, Political Behavior.
[21] D. Kahan. Misconceptions, Misinformation, and the Logic of Identity-Protective Cognition , 2017 .
[22] Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al. Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence , 2017, PloS one.
[23] J. Druckman,et al. The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics , 2017 .
[24] Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.
[25] Dolores Albarracín,et al. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation , 2017, Psychological science.
[26] David G. Rand,et al. In-Group Favoritism Caused by Pokémon Go and the Use of Machine Learning for Principled Investigation of Potential Moderators , 2017 .
[27] David G. Rand,et al. Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Bullshit Receptivity, Overclaiming, Familiarity, and Analytic Thinking , 2017, Journal of personality.
[28] Miriam J. Metzger,et al. The science of fake news , 2018, Science.
[29] A. Coppock. Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach , 2018, Political Science Research and Methods.
[30] Jonathan A. Busam,et al. Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media , 2020, Political Behavior.
[31] Ethan Porter,et al. The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence , 2019 .
[32] David G. Rand,et al. Belief in Fake News Is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking , 2018, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
[33] David G. Rand,et al. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.
[34] David G. Rand,et al. Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] David G. Rand,et al. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. , 2020, Journal of personality.
[36] Self-reported willingness to share political news articles in online surveys correlates with actual sharing on Twitter , 2020, PloS one.
[37] David G. Rand,et al. Rethinking the link between cognitive sophistication and politically motivated reasoning. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. General.