Do “hyper-travellers” exist? – Initial results of an international survey on public transport user behaviour.

Transport modelling – both in traffic and transit fields – has been traditionally based on the assumption of the utility maximization principle. In public transport networks with high frequency services this has led to “hyperpath” route choice models in which passengers reduce their travel time by identifying for each node a set of attractive lines, each of which might be the fastest from the node, depending on its and other lines arrival time. Several assignment models have been developed using hyperpaths but the question of “whether” and “to what extent” transit users are able to reason and act in terms of hyperpaths has not yet been addressed. Doubts generated by the research on route choice call for experimental studies of the issue. The paper reports the initial results of a web-based survey of public transport frequent users in six countries (China, Germany, Japan, Italy, UK, and USA). Analyses of the replies concerning travellers’ actual behaviour are presented, which provide insights on the flexibility of route choice in relation to trip characteristics and information on services. Further behavioural research is identified which can lead to improved transit route choice and assignment models.

[1]  J. Wolpert THE DECISION PROCESS IN SPATIAL CONTEXT1 , 1964 .

[2]  M. F. Fuller,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics; Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 1973 .

[3]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  The Fastest Path through a Network with Random Time-Dependent Travel Times , 1986, Transp. Sci..

[4]  Stefano Pallottino,et al.  Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks , 1988 .

[5]  Michael Florian,et al.  Optimal strategies: A new assignment model for transit networks , 1989 .

[6]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[7]  Enrique Fernández,et al.  Transit Assignment for Congested Public Transport Systems: An Equilibrium Model , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[8]  Reginald G. Golledge DEFINING THE CRITERIA USED IN PATH SELECTION. , 1995 .

[9]  R. Golledge,et al.  Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective , 1996 .

[10]  D. R. Thomas,et al.  On Variable Importance in Linear Regression , 1998 .

[11]  T. Gärling,et al.  Spatial Behavior in Transportation Modeling and Planning , 2001 .

[12]  R. Gonzalez Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[13]  Sang Nguyen,et al.  Route Choice on Transit Networks with Online Information at Stops , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[14]  G. Lyons The role of information in decision-making with regard to travel , 2006 .

[15]  Siriphong Lawphongpanich,et al.  Schedule-based transit assignment model with travel strategies and capacity constraints , 2008 .

[16]  Dominik Papinski,et al.  Exploring the route choice decision-making process: A comparison of planned and observed routes obtained using person-based GPS , 2009 .

[17]  Klaus Nökel,et al.  Boarding and Alighting in Frequency-Based Transit Assignment , 2009 .

[18]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Analyzing Multimodal Public Transport Journeys in London with Smart Card Fare Payment Data , 2009 .

[19]  Fumitaka Kurauchi,et al.  Transit Assignment Model Considering the Correlation of Vehicles' Arrival , 2010 .

[20]  Michael G.H. Bell,et al.  Bounded rationality in hyperpath assignment: the locally rational traveller model. , 2010 .