Preferential flow mechanisms identified from staining experiments in forested hillslopes

Field staining experiments in five different plots at two sites in Japan (Okaya in Nagano Prefecture and Konohara in Mie Prefecture) were undertaken to improve understanding of subsurface stormflow runoff within organic layers of natural forested hillslopes. This type of shallow lateral subsurface flow, specifically referred to as biomat flow, was observed only at the Okaya site based on staining experiments conducted under controlled water application rates. When the same irrigation rate (50-100 mm h-1) was applied to the Konohara site, overland flow without a significant shallow subsurface component was the dominant flow mechanism. Even in gently sloping (15-20°) forest soils at the Okaya site, biomat flow was responsible for lateral dye transport over much longer distances than sub-surface flow in the matrix of mineral soil layers. Based on analysis of staining pattern images observed in the Okaya site we conclude that: (i) the organic biomat layer could be divided into two sub-layers of different structure; (ii) biomat flow transported the dye tracer longer distances than subsurface flow in the matrix; and (iii) the biomat layer topography affected biomat flow by generating preferential flowpaths and subsequent percolation into the deeper soil. Based on field experimental results and pore-scale consideration of water infiltration into pores of soils with varying wettability properties, we hypothesized and developed a conceptual model for two key biomat flow mechanisms. The first mechanism considers lateral subsurface flow due to a permeability contrast between the much more porous and hence permeable biomat layer and the underlying mineral soil. The second mechanism involves a hydrophobic soil layer between the biomat and the underlying mineral soil. Flow across the hydrophobic layer is believed to occur when a threshold pore pressure is exceeded, i.e., as a result of a perched water table within the biomat layer. Lower pore pressures are needed to initiate flow when preferential flow paths exist that are less hydrophobic than the surrounding organic layers. Numerical models of catchment hydrology should include lateral biomat flow when such layers are present in hillslope soils, in addition to typical subsurface flow within the soil matrix. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.; ;

[1]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[2]  S. Yates,et al.  Measurement of Initial Soil-Water Contact Angle of Water Repellent Soils , 1999 .

[3]  D. DiCarlo Stability of gravity‐driven multiphase flow in porous media: 40 Years of advancements , 2013 .

[4]  R. Sidle,et al.  Hortonian overland flow from Japanese forest plantations—an aberration, the real thing, or something in between? , 2007 .

[5]  Stig Bakke,et al.  Extending Predictive Capabilities to Network Models , 1998 .

[6]  R. Sidle,et al.  Shallow lateral flow from a forested hillslope: Influence of antecedent wetness , 2005 .

[7]  C. Ritsema,et al.  Wetting patterns and moisture variability in water repellent Dutch soils. , 2000 .

[8]  R. Sidle,et al.  Landslides: Processes, Prediction, and Land Use , 2006 .

[9]  F. Dullien Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure , 1979 .

[10]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Morphological Characteristics of Macropores and the Distribution of Preferential Flow Pathways in a Forested Slope Segment , 1999 .

[11]  T. Gomi,et al.  Effects of forest floor coverage on overland flow and soil erosion on hillslopes in Japanese cypress plantation forests , 2009 .

[12]  Henry Lin,et al.  Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes , 2010 .

[13]  Cesar Zarcone,et al.  Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Louise J. Bracken,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning soil surfaces: a field methodology to examine soil surface roughness and overland flow hydraulics , 2011 .

[15]  John L. Nieber,et al.  Internal Erosion during Soil Pipeflow: State of the Science for Experimental and Numerical Analysis , 2013 .

[16]  Ruben Juanes,et al.  Nonlocal interface dynamics and pattern formation in gravity-driven unsaturated flow through porous media. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[17]  J. Parlange Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure , 1981 .

[18]  R. Sidle,et al.  Sorption of Uranine on Forest Soils , 2008 .

[19]  Jan Feyen,et al.  Air entrapment effects on infiltration rate and flow instability , 1998 .

[20]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOILS TO PREFERENTIAL FLOW OF WATER : A FIELD STUDY , 1994 .

[21]  J. S. Ellis,et al.  Investigation of contact angle heterogeneity on CO2 saturation in brine-filled porous media using 3D pore network models , 2013 .

[22]  Norman R. Morrow,et al.  The Effects of Surface Roughness On Contact: Angle With Special Reference to Petroleum Recovery , 1975 .

[23]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  Inferring flow types from dye patterns in macroporous soils , 2004 .

[24]  A. Imanishi,et al.  Ecological functions of persistent Japanese cedar litter in structuring stream macroinvertebrate assemblages , 2013, Journal of Forest Research.

[25]  J. Deckers,et al.  World Reference Base for Soil Resources , 1998 .

[26]  Masahiro Chigira,et al.  Landslides and Debris Flows Strike Kyushu, Japan , 2004 .

[27]  R. Sidle,et al.  Variation in soil characteristics and hydrologic properties associated with historic land use near a recent landslide, Nagano Prefecture, Japan , 2009 .

[28]  N. Menzies,et al.  Long-term flow rates and biomat zone hydrology in soil columns receiving septic tank effluent. , 2006, Water research.

[29]  K. Hartge,et al.  Development and application of a new sessile drop contact angle method to assess soil water repellency , 2000 .

[30]  Dirk Mallants,et al.  Criteria for selecting fluorescent dye tracers for soil hydrological applications using Uranine as an example , 2013 .

[31]  Norman R. Morrow,et al.  Capillary behavior of a perfectly wetting liquid in irregular triangular tubes , 1991 .

[32]  Karin Laursen,et al.  A conceptual model of preferential flow systems in forested hillslopes: evidence of self‐organization , 2001 .

[33]  R. Shakesby,et al.  Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance , 2000 .

[34]  J. Seibert,et al.  True colors – experimental identification of hydrological processes at a hillslope prone to slide , 2014 .

[35]  H. Gerke,et al.  Composition of Organic Matter Fractions for Explaining Wettability of Three Forest Soils , 2005 .

[36]  R. Valentino,et al.  Comparison between different approaches to modeling shallow landslide susceptibility: a case history in Oltrepo Pavese, Northern Italy , 2013 .

[37]  T. Gomi,et al.  Surface runoff as affected by soil water repellency in a Japanese cypress forest , 2007 .

[38]  S. Yates,et al.  Unstable water flow in a layered soil : I. Effects of a stable water-repellent layer , 2000 .

[39]  R. Sidle,et al.  Evaluation of storm runoff pathways in steep nested catchments draining a Japanese cypress forest in central Japan: a geochemical approach , 2010 .

[40]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm , 2000 .

[41]  J. Letey WATER-REPELLENT SOILS , 2005 .

[42]  M. Vithanage,et al.  Characterizing Time‐Dependent Contact Angles for Sands Hydrophobized with Oleic and Stearic Acids , 2012 .

[43]  Wolfgang-Albert Flügel,et al.  Delineating hydrological response units by geographical information system analyses for regional hydrological modelling using PRMS/MMS in the drainage basin of the River Bröl, Germany , 1995 .

[44]  Markus Deurer,et al.  Modeling Water Movement in Heterogeneous Water‐Repellent Soil: 2. A Conceptual Numerical Simulation , 2007 .

[45]  Shouxiang Ma,et al.  Effect of contact angle on drainage and imbibition in regular polygonal tubes , 1996 .

[46]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Preferential flow in water-repellent sands , 1998 .

[47]  J. Parlange,et al.  Capillary pressure overshoot for unstable wetting fronts is explained by Hoffman's velocity‐dependent contact‐angle relationship , 2014 .

[48]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Predictive pore‐scale modeling of two‐phase flow in mixed wet media , 2004 .

[49]  Matthew D. Jackson,et al.  Detailed physics, predictive capabilities and macroscopic consequences for pore-network models of multiphase flow. , 2002 .

[50]  X. Pang,et al.  Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency , 2000 .

[51]  Liliana Di Pietro,et al.  Scales and dimensions of momentum dissipation during preferential flow in soils , 1999 .

[52]  W Brent Lindquist,et al.  The geometry of primary drainage. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[53]  Younes Alila,et al.  Dye staining and excavation of a lateral preferential flow network. , 2008 .

[54]  John L. Nieber,et al.  Physics of water repellent soils , 2000 .

[55]  Paczuski,et al.  Avalanche dynamics in evolution, growth, and depinning models. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[56]  R. Sidle,et al.  Characteristics of overland flow generation on steep forested hillslopes of central Japan , 2008 .