Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries

PurposeInformal recycling is one of the most significant activities within waste management systems in low-income countries. The main aspect of a number of recently implemented waste management systems has been to organise the informal recycling sector. The implementation of formalisation is expected to eliminate social problems related to the informal sector, but this has not been precisely measured and evaluated. A lack of methodology to assess social impacts persists, as does the comparison of different formalisation approaches. The goal of this work is to develop a methodological procedure for assessing the contribution of formalised recycling systems in low-income countries in terms of social impacts, in comparison with informal systems.MethodsSome existing social assessment approaches were evaluated by a review of literature. This investigation focuses on the development of the social life cycle assessment approach, the analysed social aspects, proposed indicators and characterisation models within this framework.Results and discussionThis study proposes an approach for the social assessment of recycling systems based on formalisation approaches in low-income countries oriented towards the social life cycle assessment methodology (sLCA). The approach developed considers 3 social impact categories, 9 social subcategories and 26 semi-quantitative indicators for the assessment of the social impacts on formalised recyclers. It includes a characterisation procedure that takes into consideration the application of a score system and the calculation of average scores at both the indicator and subcategory levels.ConclusionsThis research shows that it would be feasible to apply a sLCA-based methodology to evaluate recycling systems based on formalisation of the informal sector. The impact categories and subcategories identified represent the social problems of informal recyclers. The 26 semi-quantitative indicators and the proposed characterisation approach attempt to measure the social impacts that currently are only qualitatively assumed. The applicability and validation of the indicators and characterisation procedure will be determined by further research. The methodology developed will be tested using data from three recycling systems in Peruvian cities.

[1]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Environmental Health: a Global Access Science Source Analysis of Air Pollution Mortality in Terms of Life Expectancy Changes: Relation between Time Series, Intervention, and Cohort Studies , 2022 .

[2]  Ling Han,et al.  The collection system for residential recyclables in communities in Haidian District, Beijing: a possible approach for China recycling. , 2008, Waste management.

[3]  R. El-Sherbiny,et al.  Economic Aspects of the Informal Sector in Solid Waste , 2010 .

[4]  Paul R. Wyrwoll,et al.  Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) , 2012 .

[5]  F. Flintoff,et al.  Management of Solid Wastes in Developing Countries , 1984 .

[6]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 2: implementation in six company case studies , 2010 .

[8]  A. Flysjö,et al.  Socioeconomic indicators as a complement to life cycle assessment—an application to salmon production systems , 2008 .

[9]  R. Brouwer,et al.  Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands , 2004 .

[10]  Horacio Terraza,et al.  Dinámicas de organización de los recicladores informales: Tres casos de estudio en América Latina , 2010 .

[11]  Thomas E. McKone,et al.  A Decision Support Framework for Sustainable Waste Management , 2011 .

[12]  Anders Klang,et al.  Sustainable management of demolition waste*/ an integrated model for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social aspects , 2003 .

[13]  D. Kriebel,et al.  Minor psychiatric disorders among Brazilian ragpickers: a cross-sectional study , 2006, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[14]  M. Hauschild,et al.  A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp) , 2006 .

[15]  Sarika Rathi,et al.  Alternative approaches for better municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. , 2006, Waste management.

[16]  C. Cheeseman,et al.  Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries , 2006 .

[17]  Andreas Ciroth,et al.  Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? , 2011 .

[18]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  Social assessment of recycling systems – Peruvian case studies , 2013 .

[19]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Societal LCA Methodology and Case Study (12 pp) , 2006 .

[20]  Martin Medina,et al.  Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America , 2000 .

[21]  Gev Eduljee Book review: Solid Waste Management in the World’s Cities. Water and Sanitation in the World’s Cities 2010 , 2012 .

[22]  Heber Pimentel Gomes,et al.  Economic viability study of a separate household waste collection in a developing country , 2005 .

[23]  Jutta Gutberlet,et al.  Waste to Energy, Wasting Resources and Livelihoods , 2011 .

[24]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Characterisation of social impacts in LCA , 2010 .

[25]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[26]  Sara Ojeda-Benítez,et al.  Formal and informal recovery of recyclables in Mexicali, Mexico: handling alternatives , 2002 .

[27]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. : Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. , 2009 .

[28]  Sandra Cointreau,et al.  Occupational and environmental health issues of solid waste management : special emphasis on middle and lower-income countries , 2006 .

[29]  Andreas Jørgensen,et al.  Methodologies for social life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[30]  C. Cheeseman,et al.  Building recycling rates through the informal sector. , 2009, Waste management.

[31]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Solid Waste management in the World's Cities , 2010 .