Overview of the three multicriteria approaches applied to a global assessment of analytical methods

Abstract Critical and global evaluation of analytical methods should be one of the primary goals in analytical chemistry. A holistic approach, however, requires a look at the varied features: commonly discussed validation criteria, often underrated practical and economic aspects, and typically overlooked compliance with the principles of green analytical chemistry. Carrying out such an assessment in a critical and transparent way is extremely difficult without special tools. The purpose of this work is to discuss and compare the three different approaches that seem to be potential candidates: multi-criteria decision analysis methods (MCDA), HEXAGON, and RGB model. The basic principles of each methodology, individual possibilities offered, and the results of the assessment of selected model methods will be presented. Ultimately, the potential compatibility of assessing the same group of methods using different tools will be examined. This contribution can help to select optimal tool and conduct more thorough and insightful assessments.

[1]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Ana Ballester-Caudet,et al.  A new tool for evaluating and/or selecting analytical methods: Summarizing the information in a hexagon , 2019, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[3]  Jacek Namieśnik,et al.  The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practices , 2013 .

[4]  Stefan Tsakovski,et al.  Simultaneous grouping and ranking with combination of SOM and TOPSIS for selection of preferable analytical procedure for furan determination in food. , 2018, Talanta.

[5]  P. Campíns-Falcó,et al.  A sustainable on-line CapLC method for quantifying antifouling agents like irgarol-1051 and diuron in water samples: Estimation of the carbon footprint. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  S. Shaarani,et al.  Methods for the analysis of Sunset Yellow FCF (E110) in food and beverage products- a review , 2016 .

[7]  J. Płotka-Wasylka,et al.  A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: Green Analytical Procedure Index. , 2018, Talanta.

[8]  Kaveh Madani,et al.  Multi-level multi-criteria analysis of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles in the United States. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Marek Tobiszewski,et al.  Green analytical chemistry introduction to chloropropanols determination at no economic and analytical performance costs? , 2016, Talanta.

[10]  J. Andréu,et al.  Contribution of the multi-attribute value theory to conflict resolution in groundwater management – application to the Mancha Oriental groundwater system, Spain , 2014 .

[11]  Russell A. Ogle,et al.  Evaluating inherently safer design with multiattribute utility theory , 2019 .

[12]  Marta Bystrzanowska,et al.  How can analysts use multicriteria decision analysis? , 2018, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.

[13]  M. Tobiszewski,et al.  Scoring of solvents used in analytical laboratories by their toxicological and exposure hazards. , 2015, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[14]  P. Kościelniak,et al.  What Color Is Your Method? Adaptation of the RGB Additive Color Model to Analytical Method Evaluation. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  M. Tobiszewski.  Metrics for green analytical chemistry , 2016 .

[16]  Rimo Xi,et al.  Development of a polyclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of Sunset Yellow FCF in food samples. , 2012, Talanta.

[17]  Dmitri Muravev,et al.  A Novel Integrated Provider Selection Multicriteria Model: The BWM-MABAC Model , 2020, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[18]  Reza Baradaran Kazemzadeh,et al.  PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Milosz Kadzinski,et al.  Co-constructive development of a green chemistry-based model for the assessment of nanoparticles synthesis , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Jacek Namieśnik,et al.  Analytical eco-scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures , 2012 .

[21]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Mohammad Noureddine,et al.  Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multi-criteria decision-making approach , 2019, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[23]  I. K. Hui,et al.  An analytical hierarchy process assessment of the ISO 14001 environmental management system , 2001 .

[24]  An-Na Tang,et al.  Dispersive solid-phase microextraction and capillary electrophoresis separation of food colorants in beverages using diamino moiety functionalized silica nanoparticles as both extractant and pseudostationary phase. , 2015, Talanta.

[25]  M. C. Prieto-Blanco,et al.  Rapid evaluation of ammonium in different rain events minimizing needed volume by a cost-effective and sustainable PDMS supported solid sensor. , 2020, Environmental pollution.

[26]  Pingli He,et al.  Determination of seven synthetic dyes in animal feeds and meat by high performance liquid chromatography with diode array and tandem mass detectors. , 2013, Food chemistry.

[27]  M. Baesso,et al.  Photoacoustic spectroscopy as a tool for determination of food dyes: comparison with first derivative spectrophotometry. , 2010, Talanta.

[28]  Marek Tobiszewski,et al.  Green Chemistry Metrics with Special Reference to Green Analytical Chemistry , 2015, Molecules.

[29]  Jean Mane,et al.  GREEN MOTION: a new and easy to use green chemistry metric from laboratories to industry , 2015 .