Investigation of the effective parameters in tube hydroforming process by using experimental and finite element method for manufacturing of tee joint products

Hydroforming is a prominent manufacturing process in automotive, aerospace, and aircraft industries. This process has several advantages compared with other conventional production method, such as weight reduction, part consolidation, improved structural strength, better stiffness, welded assembly obviation, dimensional accuracy, low spring back, and increasing in design flexibility. In tube hydroforming (THF) process, product quality mainly depends on some parameters which determine the boundary conditions of forming process. In the present work, the effect of loading path, friction coefficient, strain-hardening exponent, and fillet radius of the die on height of protrusion in expansion zone and thickness distribution in three different cross-sections is perused. In order to investigate the effects of abovementioned parameters on product quality, finite element method (FEM) was used via ABAQUS/Explicit, as well as to perform the THF process experimentally, a tubular blank was placed between two dies, sealed and filled by injecting pressurized water into it and at last, the tubular blank was shaped into die cavity. The FEM results were then compared with experimental results and were found a good compatibility between them. Finally, according to the results, a useful pattern obtained to show the relevance between effective parameters and product quality. Carefully selected combined parameters can be considered as a key factor for successful THF as well as enhance the formability.

[1]  F. Dohmann,et al.  Hydroforming-applications of coherent FE-simulations to the development of products and processes , 2004 .

[2]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Prediction of forming limits and parameters in the tube hydroforming process , 2002 .

[3]  Yeong-Maw Hwang,et al.  Analysis of tube hydroforming in a square cross-sectional die , 2005 .

[4]  Woo-Jin Song,et al.  Investigation on preformed shape design to improve formability in tube hydroforming process using FEM , 2006 .

[5]  Farhang Pourboghrat,et al.  Fourier series based finite element analysis of tube hydroforming—Generalized plane strain model , 2008 .

[6]  B. J. Mac Donald,et al.  Determination of the optimal load path for tube hydroforming processes using a fuzzy load control algorithm and finite element analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Sang-Moon Hwang,et al.  Analysis and design of hydroforming processes by the rigid–plastic finite element method , 2001 .

[8]  Nader Asnafi,et al.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of stroke-controlled tube hydroforming , 2000 .

[9]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Application of two dimensional (2D) FEA for the tube hydroforming process , 2002 .

[10]  Shijian Yuan,et al.  Progress in shell hydroforming , 2005 .

[11]  P. Wanjara,et al.  Evaluating the flow stress of aerospace alloys for tube hydroforming process by free expansion testing , 2014 .

[12]  Gilmar Ferreira Batalha,et al.  Experimental and numerical simulation of tube hydroforming (THF) , 2005 .

[13]  Lorenzo M. Smith,et al.  A non-finite element approach for tubular hydroforming simulation featuring a new sticking friction model , 2006 .

[14]  Suwat Jirathearanat,et al.  Hydroforming of Y-shapes—product and process design using FEA simulation and experiments , 2004 .

[15]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Blank holder force (BHF) control in viscous pressure forming (VPF) of sheet metal , 2000 .

[16]  Mahmoud Mosavi Mashhadi,et al.  Finite element simulation and experiment in tube hydroforming of unequal T shapes , 2006 .

[17]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends , 2000 .

[18]  Mgd Marc Geers,et al.  An adaptive simulation approach designed for tube hydroforming processes , 2005 .

[19]  Bing Li,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of forming parameters for tube hydroforming process based on the Taguchi method , 2006 .

[20]  Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.  Tube hydroforming compression test for friction estimation—numerical inverse method, application, and analysis , 2013 .

[21]  Shi-Hong Zhang,et al.  Hydroforming Highlights: Sheet Hydroforming and Tube Hydroforming , 2004 .

[22]  Abdul-Ghani Olabi,et al.  Feasibility of multi-layered tubular components forming by hydroforming and finite element simulation , 2006 .

[23]  Zhuang Fu,et al.  A study on numerical simulation of hydroforming of aluminum alloy tube , 2004 .

[24]  Daniel E. Green,et al.  A hybrid-constrained MOGA and local search method to optimize the load path for tube hydroforming , 2012 .

[25]  Taylan Altan,et al.  An inverse energy approach to determine the flow stress of tubular materials for hydroforming applications , 2004 .

[26]  Ba Nghiep Nguyen,et al.  A Numerical Process Control Method for Circular-Tube Hydroforming Prediction , 2004 .

[27]  Miroslav Plančak,et al.  Analysis, finite element simulation and experimental investigation of friction in tube hydroforming , 2005 .

[28]  Kai Li,et al.  Optimization of loading path in hydroforming T-shape using fuzzy control algorithm , 2013 .

[29]  Mehdi Imaninejad,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of free-bulge formation during hydroforming of aluminum extrusions , 2004 .

[30]  Matteo Strano,et al.  FEM analysis of tube pre-bending and hydroforming , 2004 .

[31]  C. T. Kwan,et al.  Application of abductive network and FEM to predict an acceptable product on T-shape tube hydroforming process , 2004 .

[32]  Ghassan T. Kridli,et al.  Investigation of thickness variation and corner filling in tube hydroforming , 2003 .

[33]  Nader Asnafi Analytical modelling of tube hydroforming , 1999 .

[34]  Dong-Yol Yang,et al.  Numerical modeling of the multi-stage sheet pair hydroforming process , 2004 .

[35]  Zhongqin Lin,et al.  Theoretical and experimental study on formability of laser seamed tube hydroforming , 2014 .

[36]  Dorel Banabic,et al.  Simulation of the hydroforming process using a new orthotropic yield criterion , 2004 .

[37]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Finite element analysis of tube hydroforming processes in a rectangular die , 2003 .

[38]  Germaine Nefussi,et al.  Unified failure analysis for tubular hydroforming , 2004 .