Application of the active camber morphing concept based on compliant structures to a regional aircraft

The present work addresses the optimal design of a morphing mechanism based on compliant structures used to implement the active camber morphing concept. The subject of the work is part of the FP7-NOVEMOR project (Novel Air Vehicle Configurations: From Fluttering Wings to Morphing Flight) which is one of the many projects from the seventh European Framework Programme. The implementation of active camber concept is based on the use of conformable morphing control surfaces. Aiming at the optimal design of such as morphing devices, two dedicated tools called PHORMA and SPHERA, respectively, are introduced. The definition of the optimal shape taking into account both aerodynamic and structural constraints is done by PHORMA. Then SPHERA, based on the load path approach codified by coupling a non linear beam solver to a genetic multi– objective optimizer, is adopted to generate the optimal internal structure able to produce, when loaded, the target optimal shape. The paper is mainly focused on the optimal design of the compliant structures starting from the optimal shape already available for a Reference Aircraft (RA) developed inside NOVEMOR project and representative of a typical regional jet capable to carry 113 PAX in a single economic class.

[1]  B. Kulfan.  Universal Parametric Geometry Representation Method , 2008 .

[2]  William A. Crossley,et al.  AIRCRAFT SIZING WITH MORPHING AS AN INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: MOTIVATION, STRATEGIES AND INVESTIGATIONS , 2002 .

[3]  P. Mantegazza,et al.  Multibody Implementation of Finite Volume C-0 Beams , 2000 .

[4]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  A Two-Level Approach for the Optimal Design of Morphing Wings Based On Compliant Structures , 2011 .

[5]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[6]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  PARAMETERIZATION STRATEGY FOR OPTIMIZATION OF SHAPE MORPHING COMPLIANT MECHANISMS USING LOAD PATH REPRESENTATION , 2003, DAC 2003.

[7]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms , 1999 .

[8]  Brenda M. Kulfan,et al.  New Supersonic Wing Far-Field Composite-Element Wave-Drag Optimization Method , 2009 .

[9]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[10]  Osvaldo M. Querin,et al.  Growth method for size, topology, and geometry optimization of truss structures , 2006 .

[11]  Jayanth N. Kudva,et al.  Development of Next Generation Morphing Aircraft Structures , 2007 .

[12]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  Realization of an optimized wing camber by using formvariable flap structures , 2001 .

[13]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Topology optimization of compliant mechanisms with multiple outputs , 1999 .

[14]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[15]  H. Sobieczky.  Parametric Airfoils and Wings , 1999 .

[16]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization , 1997 .

[17]  Pierangelo Masarati,et al.  Comprehensive Multibody AeroServoElastic Analysis of Integrated Rotorcraft Active Controls , 1999 .

[18]  R. K. Ursem.  Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[19]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Application of Active Camber Morphing Concept to a Regional Aircraft , 2014 .

[20]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .