The Entanglement of Enterprise Architecture and IT-Governance: The Cases of Norway and the Netherlands

Governments are developing infrastructures to spur e-government development. These e-government infrastructures are based on the notion of ICT as a utility that can be (re-)used by organizations at all levels of government to create their own service provisioning and to facilitate interaction with each other. This paper investigates the development of such infrastructures by looking at regional and national aspects. A cross-country comparative framework is developed and 2 countries are analyzed. We found that infrastructure development in both countries is similar at a global level, yet the governance is different. While Norway aims to enable integration by developing a Business Process Management building block on the national level, in the Netherlands local governments compose and integrate the building blocks with implementation support from the national level. These differences between e- government infrastructure developments of the two countries can be attributed to the degree of centralization of government and the degree of active support given to e-government developments.

[1]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[2]  J ArmourFrank,et al.  A Big-Picture Look at Enterprise Architectures , 1999 .

[3]  Michael A. Rappa,et al.  The utility business model and the future of computing services , 2004, IBM Syst. J..

[4]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government adoption: architecture and barriers , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[5]  John Krogstie,et al.  Active knowledge modeling of enterprises , 2008 .

[6]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Issues and strategies for conducting cross-national e-government comparative research , 2009, ICEGOV '09.

[7]  Robert Winter,et al.  Enterprise architecture governance: the need for a business-to-IT approach , 2008, SAC '08.

[8]  Peter Weill,et al.  A matrixed approach to designind it governance , 2005 .

[9]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[10]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[11]  F. J. Armour,et al.  A big-picture look at enterprise architectures , 1999 .

[12]  Beryl Bellman,et al.  Enterprise Architecture for e-Government , 2004, EGOV.

[13]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Influencing the effectiveness of IT governance practices through steering committees and communication policies , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  A Principles-Based Enterprise Architecture: Lessons from Texaco and Star Enterprise , 1990, MIS Q..

[16]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The Cases of Denmark and the Netherlands , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[17]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages , 2003, MIS Q. Executive.

[18]  Marc Braun Centralization/Decentralization Cycles in Computing: Market Evidence , 1997, Wirtsch..

[19]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  Towards an enterprise architecture for public administration using a top-down approach , 2000, ECIS.