Barriers to successful implementation of care in home haemodialysis (BASIC-HHD):1. Study design, methods and rationale

BackgroundTen years on from the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence’ technology appraisal guideline on haemodialysis in 2002; the clinical community is yet to rise to the challenge of providing home haemodialysis (HHD) to 10-15% of the dialysis cohort. The renal registry report, suggests underutilization of a treatment type that has had a lot of research interest and several publications worldwide on its apparent benefit for both physical and mental health of patients. An understanding of the drivers to introducing and sustaining the modality, from organizational, economic, clinical and patient perspectives is fundamental to realizing the full benefits of the therapy with the potential to provide evidence base for effective care models. Through the BASIC-HHD study, we seek to understand the clinical, patient and carer related psychosocial, economic and organisational determinants of successful uptake and maintenance of home haemodialysis and thereby, engage all major stakeholders in the process.Design and methodsWe have adopted an integrated mixed methodology (convergent, parallel design) for this study. The study arms include a. patient; b. organization; c. carer and d. economic evaluation. The three patient study cohorts (n = 500) include pre-dialysis patients (200), hospital haemodialysis (200) and home haemodialysis patients (100) from geographically distinct NHS sites, across the country and with variable prevalence of home haemodialysis. The pre-dialysis patients will also be prospectively followed up for a period of 12 months from study entry to understand their journey to renal replacement therapy and subsequently, before and after studies will be carried out for a select few who do commence dialysis in the study period. The process will entail quantitative methods and ethnographic interviews of all groups in the study. Data collection will involve clinical and biomarkers, psychosocial quantitative assessments and neuropsychometric tests in patients. Organizational attitudes and dialysis unit practices will be studied together with perceptions of healthcare providers on provision of home HD. Economic evaluation of home and hospital haemodialysis practices will also be undertaken and we will apply scenario ("what … if") analysis using system dynamics modeling to investigate the impact of different policy choices and financial models on dialysis technology adoption, care pathways and costs. Less attention is often given to the patient’s carers who provide informal support, often of a complex nature to patients afflicted by chronic ailments such as end stage kidney disease. Engaging the carers is fundamental to realizing the full benefits of a complex, home-based intervention and a qualitative study of the carers will be undertaken to elicit their fears, concerns and perception of home HD before and after patient’s commencement of the treatment. The data sets will be analysed independently and the findings will be mixed at the stage of interpretation to form a coherent message that will be informing practice in the future.DiscussionThe BASIC-HHD study is designed to assemble pivotal information on dialysis modality choice and uptake, investigating users, care-givers and care delivery processes and study their variation in a multi-layered analytical approach within a single health care system. The study results would define modality specific service and patient pathway redesign.Study RegistrationThis study has been reviewed and approved by the Greater Manchester West Health Research Authority National Research Ethics Service (NRES) The study is on the NIHR (CLRN) portfolio.

[1]  B. Hong,et al.  Diagnosis of Depression in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease , 1985 .

[2]  A. Ash,et al.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. , 1989, Journal of general internal medicine.

[3]  B. Manns,et al.  Why patients with ESRD do not select self-care dialysis as a treatment option. , 2003, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[4]  Kirsten Howard,et al.  A Synergistic Approach , 2008 .

[5]  A. Bryman Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[6]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[7]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2008 .

[8]  อุษา ศรีจินดารัตน์ Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2012 .

[9]  Neil R. Powe,et al.  Chronic kidney disease as a global public health problem: approaches and initiatives - a position statement from Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes. , 2007, Kidney international.

[10]  R. Maunder,et al.  Assessing patterns of adult attachment in medical patients. , 2009, General hospital psychiatry.

[11]  B. Levy Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  C. Spielberger,et al.  STAI manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory ("self-evaluation questionnaire") , 1970 .

[13]  B. Piraino,et al.  Systematic barriers to the effective delivery of home dialysis in the United States: a report from the Public Policy/Advocacy Committee of the North American Chapter of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. , 2011, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[14]  Rajnish Mehrotra,et al.  Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-center hemodialysis. , 2005, Kidney international.

[15]  Alan Cass,et al.  The cost‐effectiveness of increasing kidney transplantation and home‐based dialysis , 2009, Nephrology.

[16]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  A brief questionnaire on metacognition: Psychometric properties , 2011, Aging & mental health.

[17]  P. Roderick,et al.  Social deprivation and survival on renal replacement therapy in England and Wales. , 2006, Kidney international.

[18]  C. Hertzog,et al.  Metacognition in adulthood and old age. , 2000 .

[19]  M. Jadoul,et al.  Influence of a pre-dialysis education programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy. , 2005, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[20]  J. Chilcot The Importance of Illness Perception in End‐Stage Renal Disease: Associations with Psychosocial and Clinical Outcomes , 2012, Seminars in dialysis.

[21]  M. Lachman,et al.  Memory Control Beliefs: How are They Related to Age, Strategy Use and Memory Improvement? , 2006 .

[22]  G. Nesrallah,et al.  Modality options for renal replacement therapy: The integrated care concept revisited , 2006, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[23]  Christopher T. Chan,et al.  Patient and technique survival among a Canadian multicenter nocturnal home hemodialysis cohort. , 2010, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[24]  Chris Ham,et al.  Learning from the NHS Internal Market: A Review of the Evidence , 1999, BMJ.

[25]  A. Rush,et al.  Validation of depression screening scales in patients with CKD. , 2009, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[26]  Martin Marshall,et al.  The quantitative measurement of organizational culture in health care: a review of the available instruments. , 2003, Health services research.

[27]  S. Stearns,et al.  Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of home versus hospital or satellite unit haemodialysis for people with end-stage renal failure. , 2003, Health technology assessment.

[28]  D. Harris,et al.  A Review of Quality of Life in Chronic Renal Failure , 1997, PharmacoEconomics.

[29]  Scott D. Cohen,et al.  Depression in end-stage renal disease patients: a critical review. , 2007, Advances in chronic kidney disease.

[30]  C. Douglas,et al.  An introduction to mixed methods research for nephrology nurses , 2013 .

[31]  P. Kimmel,et al.  Death or hospitalization of patients on chronic hemodialysis is associated with a physician-based diagnosis of depression. , 2008, Kidney international.

[32]  I. Ledebo What limits the expansion of self‐care dialysis at home? , 2008, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[33]  Keith Petrie,et al.  The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) , 2002 .

[34]  P. Kerr,et al.  How Australian nephrologists view home dialysis: Results of a national survey , 2011, Nephrology.

[35]  福田 博一 State-Trait Anxiety Inventoryによるペインクリニック外来患者の不安の評価 , 1994 .

[36]  B. Hong,et al.  Diagnosis of depression in patients with end-stage renal disease. Comparative analysis. , 1985, The American journal of medicine.

[37]  E. Lowrie,et al.  Medical outcomes study short form-36: a consistent and powerful predictor of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. , 2003, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[38]  J M Morse,et al.  Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. , 1991, Nursing research.

[39]  J. Ware SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .

[40]  Alessandra Conversi,et al.  Comparative Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[41]  C. Blagg,et al.  Home haemodialysis-international trends and variation. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[42]  I. Durand-zaleski,et al.  International Study of Health Care Organization and Financing for end-stage renal disease in France , 2007, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics.

[43]  W. van Biesen,et al.  An update on the referral pattern of patients with end-stage renal disease. , 2002, Kidney international. Supplement.

[44]  M. Mahdavi-Mazdeh,et al.  Establishing the Global Kidney Disease Prevention Network (KDPN): a position statement from the National Kidney Foundation. , 2011, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[45]  G. Rodin,et al.  The Beck Depression Inventory as a Screening Device for Major Depression in Renal Dialysis Patients , 1989, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[46]  N. Powe,et al.  US nephrologists' recommendation of dialysis modality: results of a national survey. , 2000, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[47]  N. Mays,et al.  Learning from the NHS internal market : a review of the evidence , 1998 .

[48]  K. Farrington,et al.  Screening for depression while patients dialyse: an evaluation. , 2008, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[49]  P S Kurtin,et al.  Monitoring dialysis patients' health status. , 1994, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[50]  Stephen W. Smith,et al.  Predicting a patient's choice of dialysis modality: experience in a United Kingdom renal department. , 2001, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[51]  G. Barril,et al.  Analysis of Patient Flow into Dialysis: Role of Education in Choice of Dialysis Modality , 2005, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[52]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Thinking and Behavioral Styles: Consistency between Self-Descriptions and Descriptions by Others , 1987 .