In Vivo Deformation, Surface Damage, and Biostability of Retrieved Dynesys Systems

Study Design. Retrospective retrieval analysis. Objective. To evaluate wear, deformation and biodegradation within retrieved polycarbonate urethane (PCU) components of Dynesys systems. Summary of Background Data. The Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization System (Zimmer Spine) consists of pedicle screws (Ti alloy), polycarbonate urethane (PCU) spacers, and a polyethylene-terephthalate cord. Methods. Seventeen retrieved (mean implantation: 2.5 years, range: 0.7–7.0 years) and 2 exemplar implant systems were available. Reasons for revision were persistent pain (16/17), infection (1/17), and/or screw loosening (11/17), with 1/17 case of implant migration. Optical microscopy, microCT, and scanning electron microscopy were conducted to evaluate PCU spacer wear and deformation. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to assess spacer surface chemical composition. Results. Retrieved spacer components exhibited permanent bending deformation (mean: 4.3°, range: 0.0°–15.8°). We observed evidence of PCU spacer contact with pedicle screws, cords, and surrounding bony structures (74/75, 69/75, and 51/75 spacers, respectively). Relatively infrequent damage modes included PCU fracture (1/75 spacers) or cracking (2/75 spacers), as well as pedicle screw fracture (3/103 screws). PCU degradation products were identified in 10/75 spacers, which represented retrievals having significantly longer implantation times (mean: 4.3 years, range: 1.0–7.0 years). Of these spacers, 8/10 had degradation peaks identified along the side of the spacer where the material would have been in contact with bodily fluid. Conclusion. PCU spacers from retrieved Dynesys systems exhibited permanent deformation, focal regions of in vivo wear and surface damage. Chemical changes associated with PCU biodegradation were associated with longer-term retrievals. The most frequently observed complication was pedicle screw loosening, with 3 incidences of screw breakage in 2 patients. These retrieval data provide a crucial basis for developing in vitro tests to simulate in vivo damage and degradation of posterior dynamic motion preservation implants. Longer-term retrievals, as well as retrievals that include more recent design features (e.g., HA coating), will be useful to provide a greater context for the clinical implications of our short-term observations.

[1]  T. Wright,et al.  Use of instrumented pedicle screws to evaluate load sharing in posterior dynamic stabilization systems. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  E. Kast,et al.  Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration , 2008, Neurosurgical Review.

[3]  Thomas R Oxland,et al.  The Effect of Dynamic Posterior Stabilization on Facet Joint Contact Forces: An In Vitro Investigation , 2008, Spine.

[4]  M. Asher,et al.  Re: Villarraga ML, Cripton PA, Teti SD, et al. Wear and corrosion in retrieved thoracolumbar posterior internal fixation. Spine 2006;31:2454-62. , 2007, Spine.

[5]  Justin Hughes,et al.  The Dynesys Lumbar Spinal Stabilization System: A Preliminary Report on Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings , 2007, Spine.

[6]  P. Cripton,et al.  Wear and Corrosion in Retrieved Thoracolumbar Posterior Internal Fixation , 2006, Spine.

[7]  Thomas R. Oxland,et al.  Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[8]  L. Claes,et al.  Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[9]  M. Dadsetan,et al.  Biostability and macrophage-mediated foreign body reaction of silicone-modified polyurethanes. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[10]  Carsten Perka,et al.  The Surgical Treatment of the Lumbar Disc Prolapse: Nucleotomy With Additional Transpedicular Dynamic Stabilization Versus Nucleotomy Alone , 2005, Spine.

[11]  Astrid Junge,et al.  Clinical Experience With the Dynesys Semirigid Fixation System for the Lumbar Spine: Surgical and Patient-Oriented Outcome in 50 Cases After an Average of 2 Years , 2005, Spine.

[12]  Anne Hiltner,et al.  Oxidative mechanisms of poly(carbonate urethane) and poly(ether urethane) biodegradation: in vivo and in vitro correlations. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  O. Schwarzenbach,et al.  The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[14]  R. McLain,et al.  Mechanoreceptor Endings in Human Thoracic and Lumbar Facet Joints , 1998, Spine.