Teachers' views on the nature of models

A semi‐structured interview was used in Brazil to enquire into the ‘notion of model’ held by a total sample of 39 science teachers who were: employed in ‘fundamental’ (6–14 years) and ‘medium’ (15–17 years) schools; student science teachers currently doing their practicum; and university science teachers. Seven ‘aspects’ of their notions of a model were identified: the nature of a model, the use to which it can be put, the entities of which it consists, its relative uniqueness, the time span over which it is used, its status in the making of predictions, and the basis for the accreditation of its existence and use. Categories of meaning were identified for each of these aspects. The profiles of teachers' notions of ‘model’ in terms of the aspects and categories were complex, providing no support for the notion of ‘Levels’ in understanding. Teachers with degrees in chemistry or physics had different views about the notion of ‘model’ to those with degrees in biology or with teacher training certificates.

[1]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers , 2002 .

[2]  Rosária Justi,et al.  Science teachers' knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science , 2002 .

[3]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[4]  Wobbe de Vos,et al.  Public Understanding of Science as a Separate Subject in Secondary Schools in The Netherlands. , 1999 .

[5]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Model–based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum , 1995 .

[6]  R. Hackett Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[7]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Philosophy of science: an empirical study of teachers’ views , 1989 .

[8]  Allan G. Harrison,et al.  How do Teachers and Textbook Writers Model Scientific Ideas for Students? , 2001 .

[9]  K. Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Appendix 1 , 2019, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[10]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards A More Critical Approach To Practical Work In School Science , 1993 .

[11]  J. Tomasi Towards 'chemical congruence' of the models in theoretical chemistry , 1999 .

[12]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Teachers' Knowledge of Models and Modelling in Science. , 1999 .

[13]  Rosária Justi,et al.  A cause of ahistorical science teaching: Use of hybrid models , 1999 .

[14]  Michael Twyman,et al.  Using Pictorial Language: A Discussion of the Dimensions of the Problem , 1985 .

[15]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[16]  R. Millar Towards a science curriculum for public understanding , 1996 .

[17]  S. Gilbert Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[18]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Secondary students' mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry , 1996 .

[19]  Lon Barfield Modelling a process , 2002, CHIB.

[20]  Z. Dagher Analysis of analogies used by science teachers , 1995 .

[21]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[22]  Jon Ogborn,et al.  Science teachers’ philosophical assumptions: how well do we understand them? , 1995 .

[23]  T. Richards,et al.  The NUDIST qualitative data analysis system , 1991 .

[24]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .